Literature DB >> 21635293

Switching between sensory and affective systems incurs processing costs.

Nicolas Vermeulen1, Paula M Niedenthal, Olivier Luminet.   

Abstract

Recent models of the conceptual system hold that concepts are grounded in simulations of actual experiences with instances of those concepts in sensory-motor systems (e.g., Barsalou, 1999, 2003; Solomon & Barsalou, 2001). Studies supportive of such a viewhave shown that verifying a property of a concept in one modality, and then switching to verify a property of a different concept in a different modality generates temporal processing costs similar to the cost of switching modalities in perception. In addition to non-emotional concepts, the present experiment investigated switching costs in verifying properties of positive and negative (emotional) concepts. Properties of emotional concepts were taken from vision, audition, and the affective system. Parallel to switching costs in neutral concepts, the study showed that for positive and negative concepts, verifying properties from different modalities produced processing costs such that reaction times were longer and error rates were higher. Importantly, this effect was observed when switching from the affective system to sensory modalities, and vice-versa. These results support the embodied cognition view of emotion in humans. 2007 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 21635293     DOI: 10.1080/03640210709336990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Sci        ISSN: 0364-0213


  17 in total

1.  Concepts are not represented by conscious imagery.

Authors:  Diane Pecher; Saskia van Dantzig; Hendrik N J Schifferstein
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-10

2.  Verifying properties of concepts spontaneously requires sharing resources with same-modality percept.

Authors:  Nicolas Vermeulen; Betty Chang; Olivier Corneille; Gordy Pleyers; Martial Mermillod
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2013-02-15

3.  The Multilevel Modality-Switch Effect: What Happens When We See the Bees Buzzing and Hear the Diamonds Glistening.

Authors:  Elisa Scerrati; Luisa Lugli; Roberto Nicoletti; Anna Maria Borghi
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-06

4.  Mental states inside out: switching costs for emotional and nonemotional sentences that differ in internal and external focus.

Authors:  Suzanne Oosterwijk; Piotr Winkielman; Diane Pecher; René Zeelenberg; Mark Rotteveel; Agneta H Fischer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-01

5.  Fast emotional embodiment can modulate sensory exposure in perceivers.

Authors:  Nicolas Vermeulen; Martial Mermillod
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2010-03

6.  Switching Modalities in A Sentence Verification Task: ERP Evidence for Embodied Language Processing.

Authors:  Lea A Hald; Julie-Ann Marshall; Dirk P Janssen; Alan Garnham
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-03-18

7.  Modality Switching in a Property Verification Task: An ERP Study of What Happens When Candles Flicker after High Heels Click.

Authors:  Jennifer Collins; Diane Pecher; René Zeelenberg; Seana Coulson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-02-08

8.  Emotional modulation of attention: fear increases but disgust reduces the attentional blink.

Authors:  Nicolas Vermeulen; Jimmy Godefroid; Martial Mermillod
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Perceptual and Interoceptive Strength Norms for 270 French Words.

Authors:  Aurélie Miceli; Erika Wauthia; Laurent Lefebvre; Laurence Ris; Isabelle Simoes Loureiro
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-11

10.  Exploring modality switching effects in negated sentences: further evidence for grounded representations.

Authors:  Lea A Hald; Ian Hocking; David Vernon; Julie-Ann Marshall; Alan Garnham
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-02-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.