Literature DB >> 11516446

Processing of irrelevant visual motion during performance of an auditory attention task.

G Rees1, C Frith, N Lavie.   

Abstract

The extent to which irrelevant perception of visual motion distractors can be modulated by manipulating auditory load in a relevant task was assessed with Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and behavioural experiments. Subjects performed an auditory task and ignored an irrelevant visual motion stimulus, under two conditions. In a low load condition, subjects were asked to detect words spoken in a loud voice among words spoken in a quiet voice, while in a high load condition they attempted to detect bisyllabic words among monosyllabic and trisyllabic words. We found that motion-related visual areas were strongly activated by the irrelevant motion stimulus, compared to a static stimulus, under both conditions of load in the auditory task. In a second behavioural experiment, the duration of the motion after-effect was similarly unaffected by adaptation under low or high auditory load. These results are in clear contrast with the strong modulation of irrelevant motion processing by visual load, as reflected in the duration of the motion after effect (Section 6) and neural responses in motion-related visual areas (Rees et al., Science, (1997) 278, 338). These findings support the claim that attentional capacity is restricted within but not between sensory modalities, and indicate that processing of visual distractors may occur whenever there is sufficient visual capacity to process them, despite being task- and modality-irrelevant.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11516446     DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(01)00016-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  39 in total

1.  Observers can voluntarily shift their psychometric functions without losing sensitivity.

Authors:  Michael Morgan; Barbara Dillenburger; Sabine Raphael; Joshua A Solomon
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Controlling for dilution while manipulating load: perceptual and sensory limitations are just two aspects of task difficulty.

Authors:  Hanna Benoni; Yehoshua Tsal
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-08

3.  Wohlgemuth was right: distracting attention from the adapting stimulus does not decrease the motion after-effect.

Authors:  Michael J Morgan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-07-31       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  Twenty years of load theory-Where are we now, and where should we go next?

Authors:  Gillian Murphy; John A Groeger; Ciara M Greene
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

5.  Cross-modal perceptual load: the impact of modality and individual differences.

Authors:  Rajwant Sandhu; Benjamin James Dyson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Visual attentional load influences plasticity in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Marc R Kamke; Michelle G Hall; Hayley F Lye; Martin V Sale; Laura R Fenlon; Timothy J Carroll; Stephan Riek; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Attentional and linguistic interactions in speech perception.

Authors:  Merav Sabri; Jeffrey R Binder; Rutvik Desai; David A Medler; Michael D Leitl; Einat Liebenthal
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Attention to touch weakens audiovisual speech integration.

Authors:  Agnès Alsius; Jordi Navarra; Salvador Soto-Faraco
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Modality-specific selective attention attenuates multisensory integration.

Authors:  Jennifer L Mozolic; Christina E Hugenschmidt; Ann M Peiffer; Paul J Laurienti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Perceptual load affects exogenous spatial orienting while working memory load does not.

Authors:  Valerio Santangelo; Paola Finoia; Antonino Raffone; Marta Olivetti Belardinelli; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.