OBJECTIVE: To assess safety and efficacy of an oral, single, low dose of octanoic acid (OA) in subjects with alcohol-responsive essential tremor (ET). METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover, phase I/II clinical trial evaluating the effect of 4 mg/kg OA in 19 subjects with ET. The primary outcome was accelerometric postural tremor power of the dominant hand 80 minutes after administration. Secondary outcomes included digital spiral analysis, pharmacokinetic sampling, as well as safety measures. RESULTS:OA was safe and well tolerated. Nonserious adverse events were mild (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 1) and equally present after OA and placebo. At the primary outcome, OA effects were not different from placebo. Secondary outcome analyses of digital spiral analysis, comparison across the entire time course in weighted and nonweighted accelerometry, as well as nondominant hand tremor power did not show a benefit of OA over placebo. The analysis of individual time points showed that OA improved tremor at 300 minutes (dominant hand, F = 5.49, p = 0.032 vs placebo), with a maximum benefit at 180 minutes after OA (both hands, F = 6.1, p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Although the effects of OA and placebo at the primary outcome were not different, secondary outcome measures suggest superiority of OA in reducing tremor at later time points, warranting further trials at higher dose levels. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class I evidence that a single 4-mg/kg dose of OA is not effective in reducing postural tremor in patients with ET at a primary outcome of 80 minutes, but is effective for a secondary outcome after 180 minutes.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To assess safety and efficacy of an oral, single, low dose of octanoic acid (OA) in subjects with alcohol-responsive essential tremor (ET). METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover, phase I/II clinical trial evaluating the effect of 4 mg/kg OA in 19 subjects with ET. The primary outcome was accelerometric postural tremor power of the dominant hand 80 minutes after administration. Secondary outcomes included digital spiral analysis, pharmacokinetic sampling, as well as safety measures. RESULTS: OA was safe and well tolerated. Nonserious adverse events were mild (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 1) and equally present after OA and placebo. At the primary outcome, OA effects were not different from placebo. Secondary outcome analyses of digital spiral analysis, comparison across the entire time course in weighted and nonweighted accelerometry, as well as nondominant hand tremor power did not show a benefit of OA over placebo. The analysis of individual time points showed that OA improved tremor at 300 minutes (dominant hand, F = 5.49, p = 0.032 vs placebo), with a maximum benefit at 180 minutes after OA (both hands, F = 6.1, p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Although the effects of OA and placebo at the primary outcome were not different, secondary outcome measures suggest superiority of OA in reducing tremor at later time points, warranting further trials at higher dose levels. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class I evidence that a single 4-mg/kg dose of OA is not effective in reducing postural tremor in patients with ET at a primary outcome of 80 minutes, but is effective for a secondary outcome after 180 minutes.
Authors: Dietrich Haubenberger; Daniel Kalowitz; Fatta B Nahab; Camilo Toro; Dominic Ippolito; David A Luckenbaugh; Loretta Wittevrongel; Mark Hallett Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2011-06-28 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Fatta B Nahab; Adrian Handforth; Tyler Brown; Christopher Shin; Arnulfo Quesada; Chuanhui Dong; Dietrich Haubenberger; Mark Hallett Journal: Neurotherapeutics Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 7.620
Authors: Fatta B Nahab; Loretta Wittevrongel; Dominic Ippolito; Camilo Toro; George J Grimes; Judith Starling; Gopal Potti; Dietrich Haubenberger; Daniel Bowen; Peter Buchwald; Chuanhui Dong; Daniel Kalowitz; Mark Hallett Journal: Neurotherapeutics Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 7.620
Authors: Stephen Hague; Ekaterina Rogaeva; Dena Hernandez; Cindy Gulick; Amanda Singleton; Melissa Hanson; Janel Johnson; Roberto Weiser; Marisol Gallardo; Bernard Ravina; Katrina Gwinn-Hardy; Anthony Crawley; Peter H St George-Hyslop; Anthony E Lang; Peter Heutink; Vincenzo Bonifati; John Hardy; Andrew Singleton Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Dietrich Haubenberger; Giovanni Abbruzzese; Peter G Bain; Nin Bajaj; Julián Benito-León; Kailash P Bhatia; Günther Deuschl; Maria João Forjaz; Mark Hallett; Elan D Louis; Kelly E Lyons; Tiago A Mestre; Jan Raethjen; Maria Stamelou; Eng-King Tan; Claudia M Testa; Rodger J Elble Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2016-06-06 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Soren Y Lowell; Richard T Kelley; Marika Monahan; Carly Jo Hosbach-Cannon; Raymond H Colton; Dragos Mihaila Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2018-12-25 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Franziska Hopfner; Dietrich Haubenberger; Wendy R Galpern; Katrina Gwinn; Ashlee Van't Veer; Samantha White; Kailash Bhatia; Charles H Adler; David Eidelberg; William Ondo; Glenn T Stebbins; Caroline M Tanner; Rick C Helmich; Fred A Lenz; Roy V Sillitoe; David Vaillancourt; Jerrold L Vitek; Elan D Louis; Holly A Shill; Matthew P Frosch; Tatiana Foroud; Gregor Kuhlenbäumer; Andrew Singleton; Claudia M Testa; Mark Hallett; Rodger Elble; Günther Deuschl Journal: Parkinsonism Relat Disord Date: 2016-10-04 Impact factor: 4.891