| Literature DB >> 27273470 |
Dietrich Haubenberger1, Giovanni Abbruzzese2, Peter G Bain3, Nin Bajaj4, Julián Benito-León5,6,7, Kailash P Bhatia8, Günther Deuschl9, Maria João Forjaz10, Mark Hallett11, Elan D Louis12, Kelly E Lyons13, Tiago A Mestre14, Jan Raethjen9, Maria Stamelou15, Eng-King Tan16, Claudia M Testa17, Rodger J Elble18.
Abstract
The International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society established a task force on tremor that reviewed the use of transducer-based measures in the quantification and characterization of tremor. Studies of accelerometry, electromyography, activity monitoring, gyroscopy, digitizing tablet-based measures, vocal acoustic analysis, and several other transducer-based methods were identified by searching PubMed.gov. The availability, use, acceptability, reliability, validity, and responsiveness were reviewed for each measure using the following criteria: (1) used in the assessment of tremor; (2) used in published studies by people other than the developers; and (3) adequate clinimetric testing. Accelerometry, gyroscopy, electromyography, and digitizing tablet-based measures fulfilled all three criteria. Compared to rating scales, transducers are far more sensitive to changes in tremor amplitude and frequency, but they do not appear to be more capable of detecting a change that exceeds random variability in tremor amplitude (minimum detectable change). The use of transducer-based measures requires careful attention to their limitations and validity in a particular clinical or research setting.Entities:
Keywords: accelerometry; electromyography; reproducibility of results; transducers; tremor
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27273470 PMCID: PMC5014626 DOI: 10.1002/mds.26671
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mov Disord ISSN: 0885-3185 Impact factor: 10.338