Literature DB >> 23408192

Self-etch adhesives for the bonding of orthodontic brackets: faster, stronger, safer?

Timea Lamper1, Nicoleta Ilie, Karin C Huth, Ingrid Rudzki, Andrea Wichelhaus, Ekaterini Paschos.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of accelerating procedures for bonding of orthodontic brackets in vitro by comparing different adhesives (etch-and-rinse, self-etch) and polymerization procedures (curing devices, time). The performance was characterized by three parameters: (1) the bond strength achieved, (2) the incidence of enamel damage, and (3) the extent of residual composite on the tooth.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bracket bonding was performed on 500 extracted human teeth after application of either an etch-and-rinse adhesive or a one-step self-etch adhesive. Two different two-component self-etch adhesives (Clearfil SE and Transbond Plus) and two single-component self-etch adhesives (Ideal and iBond) were investigated after using different polymerization procedures (light-emitting diode for 10 or 20 s or plasma arc curing device for 3 or 6 s). The bond strength, incidence of enamel damage, and extent of residual composite on the tooth were measured.
RESULTS: Single-component self-etch adhesives gave the lowest bond strengths. No significant difference in bond strength could be detected between the two-component self-etch adhesives and the etch-and-rinse method. There was a 70.3% risk for enamel damage at bond strengths above 12 MPa, but only 5% risk below 12 MPa and no risk below 8.2 MPa. The risk of enamel damage increased by an odds ratio increment of 1.3 for each additional MPa above 8.2 MPa.
CONCLUSION: Single-component self-etch adhesives showed the lowest bond strengths, caused limited enamel damage, and generally left less residual composite on the tooth. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The nature of the adhesive greatly influences the resultant bond strength, the risk of enamel damage, and the extent of residual composite on the teeth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23408192     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-013-0942-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  48 in total

1.  Effect of saliva on shear bond strength of an orthodontic adhesive used with moisture-insensitive and self-etching primers.

Authors:  Irene L Zeppieri; Chun-Hsi Chung; Francis K Mante
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  Effect of using self-etching primer for bonding orthodontic brackets.

Authors:  Rieko Yamada; Tohru Hayakawa; Kazutaka Kasai
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Finite element sub-modeling analyses of damage to enamel at the incisor enamel/adhesive interface upon de-bonding for different orthodontic bracket bases.

Authors:  Chun-Li Lin; Shao-Fu Huang; Hui-Chin Tsai; Wen-Jen Chang
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Effect of self-etching primer and adhesive formulations on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.

Authors:  Zafer C Cehreli; Defne Kecik; Ilken Kocadereli
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Investigation of shear-peel bond strength of orthodontic brackets on enamel after using Pro Seal.

Authors:  Ekaterini Paschos; Senka Okuka; Nicoleta Ilie; Karin Christine Huth; Reinhard Hickel; Ingrid Rudzki-Janson
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.938

6.  Failure rate of brackets bonded with antimicrobial and fluoride-releasing, self-etching primer and the effect on prevention of enamel demineralization.

Authors:  Ekaterini Paschos; Natascha Kurochkina; Karin C Huth; Clara S Hansson; Ingrid Rudzki-Janson
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Bracket bond strengths of new adhesive systems.

Authors:  Gerald T Minick; Larry J Oesterle; Sheldon M Newman; William Craig Shellhart
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Does a reduction of polymerization time and bonding steps affect the bond strength of brackets?

Authors:  Timea Lamper; Stefanie Steinhäuser-Andresen; Karin C Huth; Nicoleta Ilie; Ekaterini Paschos
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Evidence of chemical bonding to hydroxyapatite by phosphoric acid esters.

Authors:  Baiping Fu; Xuemei Sun; Weixin Qian; Yanqing Shen; Ranran Chen; Matthias Hannig
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Enamel cracks in debonded, debanded, and orthodontically untreated teeth.

Authors:  B U Zachrisson; O Skogan; S Höymyhr
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1980-03
View more
  9 in total

1.  Do bonding agents protect the bracket-periphery?--Evaluation by consecutive μCT scans and fluorescence measurements.

Authors:  Ekaterini Paschos; Teresa Galosi; Karin C Huth; Ingrid Rudzki; Andrea Wichelhaus; Karl-Heinz Kunzelmann
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Resistance of bonded premolars to four artificial ageing models post enamel conditioning with a novel calcium-phosphate paste.

Authors:  Ali I Ibrahim; Noor R Al-Hasani; Van P Thompson; Sanjukta Deb
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-04-01

3.  A Novel Etchant System for Orthodontic Bracket Bonding.

Authors:  A I Ibrahim; V P Thompson; S Deb
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Impact of temperature changes to the adhesion strength of molar tubes: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Benedikta Palesik; Kotryna Šileikytė; Julius Griškevičius; Rimantas Stonkus; Antanas Šidlauskas; Kristina Lopatienė
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 2.757

5.  In vitro bond strengths post thermal and fatigue load cycling of sapphire brackets bonded with self-etch primer and evaluation of enamel damage.

Authors:  Ali I Ibrahim; Noor R Al-Hasani; Van P Thompson; Sanjukta Deb
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-01-01

6.  Shear bond strength and debonding characteristics of a new premixed self-etching with a reference total-etch adhesive.

Authors:  Michael Schauseil; Sonja Blöcher; Andreas Hellak; Matthias J Roggendorf; Steffen Stein; Heike Korbmacher-Steiner
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 2.151

7.  Survival analysis of an orthodontic bracket bond subjected to cyclic tensile and shear forces.

Authors:  Ameerah Y Mansour; Mohamed Bamashmous
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2018-02-15

8.  In Vitro Study of Shear Bond Strength in Direct and Indirect Bonding with Three Types of Adhesive Systems.

Authors:  Angelica Iglesias; Teresa Flores; Javier Moyano; Montserrat Artés; Francisco Javier Gil; Andreu Puigdollers
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 3.623

9.  Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with a universal adhesive using different etching methods.

Authors:  Fereshteh Shafiei; Ahmadreza Sardarian; Reza Fekrazad; Amin Farjood
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2019-09-05
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.