Literature DB >> 20833397

Finite element sub-modeling analyses of damage to enamel at the incisor enamel/adhesive interface upon de-bonding for different orthodontic bracket bases.

Chun-Li Lin1, Shao-Fu Huang, Hui-Chin Tsai, Wen-Jen Chang.   

Abstract

This study investigates the micro-mechanical behavior associated with enamel damage at an enamel/adhesive interface for different bracket bases subjected to various detachment forces using 3-D finite element (FE) sub-modeling analysis. Two FE macro-models using triangular and square bracket bases subjected to shear, tensile and torsional de-bonding forces were established using μCT images. Six enamel/adhesive interface sub-models with micro- resin tag morphology and enamel rod arrangement were constructed at the corresponding stress concentrations in macro-model results. The boundary conditions for the sub-models were determined from the macro-model results and applied in sub-modeling analysis. The enamel and resin cement stress concentrations for triangular and square bases were observed at the adhesive bottom towards the occlusal surface under shear force and at the mesial and distal side planes under tensile force. The corresponding areas under torsional force were at the three corners of the adhesive for the triangular base and at the adhesive bottom toward/off the occlusal surface for the square base. In the sub-model analysis, the concentration regions were at the resin tag base and in the region around the etched holes in the enamel. These were perfectly consistent with morphological observations in a parallel in vitro bracket detachment experiment. The critical de-bonding forces damaging the enamel for the square base were lower than those of the triangular base for all detached forces. This study establishes that FE sub-modeling can be used to simulate the stress pattern at the micro-scale enamel/adhesive interface, suggesting that a square base bracket might be better than a triangular bracket. A de-bonding shear force can detach a bracket more easily than any other force with a lower risk of enamel loss.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20833397     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.08.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  6 in total

1.  Effect of material variation on the biomechanical behaviour of orthodontic fixed appliances: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Spyridon N Papageorgiou; Ludger Keilig; Istabrak Hasan; Andreas Jäger; Christoph Bourauel
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Orthodontic bracket debonding: risk of enamel fracture.

Authors:  Christof Holberg; Philipp Winterhalder; Nikola Holberg; Andrea Wichelhaus; Ingrid Rudzki-Janson
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Self-etch adhesives for the bonding of orthodontic brackets: faster, stronger, safer?

Authors:  Timea Lamper; Nicoleta Ilie; Karin C Huth; Ingrid Rudzki; Andrea Wichelhaus; Ekaterini Paschos
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Periodontal ligament strain induced by different orthodontic bracket removal techniques: nonlinear finite-element comparison study.

Authors:  Christof Holberg; Ingrid Rudzki-Janson; Andrea Wichelhaus; Philipp Winterhalder
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  In vitro analysis of shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index of different metal brackets.

Authors:  Fernanda de Souza Henkin; Érika de Oliveira Dias de Macêdo; Karoline da Silva Santos; Marília Schwarzbach; Susana Maria Werner Samuel; Karina Santos Mundstock
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec

6.  Comparison of shear bond strength to clinically simulated debonding of orthodontic brackets: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Amal Ibrahim Linjawi; Mona A Abbassy
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.