Literature DB >> 23407329

Complete genome sequence of Pyrobaculum oguniense.

David L Bernick1, Kevin Karplus, Lauren M Lui, Joanna K C Coker, Julie N Murphy, Patricia P Chan, Aaron E Cozen, Todd M Lowe.   

Abstract

Pyrobaculum oguniense TE7 is an aerobic hyperthermophilic crenarchaeon isolated from a hot spring in Japan. Here we describe its main chromosome of 2,436,033 bp, with three large-scale inversions and an extra-chromosomal element of 16,887 bp. We have annotated 2,800 protein-coding genes and 145 RNA genes in this genome, including nine H/ACA-like small RNA, 83 predicted C/D box small RNA, and 47 transfer RNA genes. Comparative analyses with the closest known relative, the anaerobe Pyrobaculum arsenaticum from Italy, reveals unexpectedly high synteny and nucleotide identity between these two geographically distant species. Deep sequencing of a mixture of genomic DNA from multiple cells has illuminated some of the genome dynamics potentially shared with other species in this genus.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Crenarchaea; Pyrobaculum arsenaticum; Pyrobaculum oguniense; inversion

Year:  2012        PMID: 23407329      PMCID: PMC3558965          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.2645906

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

TE7T (=DSMZ 13380=JCM10595) was originally isolated from the Tsuetate hot spring in Oguni-cho, Kumamoto Prefecture, Japan [1], and subsequently found to grow heterotrophically at an optimal temperature near 94°C, pH 7.0 (at 25°C), and in the presence or absence of oxygen. Under anaerobic conditions, it can utilize sulfur-containing compounds (sulfur, thiosulfate, L-cystine and oxidized glutathione) but not nitrate or nitrite as terminal electron acceptors. Initial 16S ribosomal DNA sequence analysis [1] placed TE7T in the clade and closest to and (now considered a member of the genus [50]). DNA hybridization studies were conducted with IM2, geo3, H10 and V24Sta, showing little genomic similarity to those species. PZ6T [2] , P. sp.1860 [3] and VA1 [4] were not available at that time. The genus is known for its range of respiratory capabilities [5]. Three of the currently known members of the genus can respire oxygen; is a facultative micro-aerobe, while and can utilize atmospheric oxygen. [6], , and four other metabolically unique species have been fully sequenced; together with , we sought to further broaden the understanding of this important hyperthermophilic group. Pairwise whole-genome alignments of previously sequenced species reveal many structural rearrangements. With the availability of high-throughput sequencing, we were able to further explore rearrangements that occur between species, and our use of a not-quite-clonal population allowed exploration of rearrangements within a single species.

Classification and features

Figure 1 and Table 1 summarize the phylogenetic position and characteristics of TE7 relative to other members of the genus, respectively.
Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree of the known species based on 16S ribosomal RNA sequence. Accession numbers and associated culture collection identifiers (when available) for 16S ribosomal RNA genes are: (NC_003364.1, DSM 7523); (NC_009073.1, DSM 21063); (NC_008701.1, DSM 4184); (NC_009376.1, DSM 13514); (CP003316, DSM 13380); (NC_010525.1, DSM 2338); P.sp.1860 (CP003098.1); (AB304846.1, DSM 4185); P.sp.CBA1503 (HM594679.1); P.sp.M0H (AB302407.1); P.sp.AQ1.S2 (DQ778007.1); P.WIJ3 (AJ277125.1); ‘P. neutrophilum’ (X81886). Sequences were aligned using MAFFT v.6 [7], followed by manual curation [8] to remove 16S ribosomal introns and all terminal gap columns caused by missing sequence. The maximum likelihood tree was constructed using Tree-Puzzle v. 5.2 [9] using exact parameter estimates, 10,000 quartets and 1000 puzzling steps. (NC_016070.1, DSM 2078) was included as an outgroup. Numbered branches show bootstrap percentages and branch lengths depict nucleotide mutation rate (see scale bar upper right).

Table 1

Classification and general features of according to the MIGS recommendations [10].

MIGS ID     Property     Term     Evidence codea
     Current classification     Domain Archaea     TAS [11]
     Phylum Crenarchaeota     TAS [12]
     Class Thermoprotei     TAS [13,14]
     Order Thermoproteales     TAS [15-18]
     Family Thermoproteaceae     TAS [15-17]
     Genus Pyrobaculum     TAS [19,20]
     Species Pyrobaculum oguniense     TAS [1]
     Type strain TE7
     Cell shape     rods 0.6-1µm × 2-10µm     TAS [1]
     Motility
     Sporulation     no
     Temperature range     70–97°C
     Optimum temperature     90–94°C
     Carbon source     heterotroph1g/L yeast extract or 0.5g/L yeast extract with 0.5g/L tryptone)     TAS [1]
     Energy source     (see carbon source)     TAS [1]
     Terminal electron acceptor     O2, sulfur compounds, no growth on NO3 or NO2     TAS [1]
MIGS-6     Habitat     hot-spring     TAS [1]
MIGS-6.3     Salinity     0–1.5% (w/v); 0% optimal     TAS [1]
MIGS-22     Oxygen     facultative aerobe     TAS [1]
MIGS-15     Biotic relationship     free-living     NAS
MIGS-14     Pathogenicity     none     NAS
MIGS-4     Geographic location     Tsuetate hot spring, Oguni-cho, Kumamoto prefecture, Japan     TAS [1]
MIGS-5     Sample collection time     June 1997     NAS
MIGS-4.1      Latitude     33.186     NAS
MIGS-4.2     Longitude     131.031     NAS
MIGS-4.3     Depth     hot-spring sediment / fluid     NAS
MIGS-4.4     Altitude     300m     NAS

Evidence codes - TAS: Traceable Author Statement; NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement. These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [22].

Phylogenetic tree of the known species based on 16S ribosomal RNA sequence. Accession numbers and associated culture collection identifiers (when available) for 16S ribosomal RNA genes are: (NC_003364.1, DSM 7523); (NC_009073.1, DSM 21063); (NC_008701.1, DSM 4184); (NC_009376.1, DSM 13514); (CP003316, DSM 13380); (NC_010525.1, DSM 2338); P.sp.1860 (CP003098.1); (AB304846.1, DSM 4185); P.sp.CBA1503 (HM594679.1); P.sp.M0H (AB302407.1); P.sp.AQ1.S2 (DQ778007.1); P.WIJ3 (AJ277125.1); ‘P. neutrophilum’ (X81886). Sequences were aligned using MAFFT v.6 [7], followed by manual curation [8] to remove 16S ribosomal introns and all terminal gap columns caused by missing sequence. The maximum likelihood tree was constructed using Tree-Puzzle v. 5.2 [9] using exact parameter estimates, 10,000 quartets and 1000 puzzling steps. (NC_016070.1, DSM 2078) was included as an outgroup. Numbered branches show bootstrap percentages and branch lengths depict nucleotide mutation rate (see scale bar upper right). Evidence codes - TAS: Traceable Author Statement; NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement. These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [22].

Genome sequencing information

Genome project history

Table 2 presents the project information and its association with MIGS version 2.0 compliance [10].
Table 2

Project information

MIGS ID    Property     Term
MIGS-31    Finishing quality     Finished
MIGS-28    Libraries used     Roche 454 Titanium library, SOLiD 2×25 Mate-pair (1k-3.5k insert)
MIGS-29    Sequencing platforms     454 GS FLX Titanium, ABI SOLiD
MIGS-31.2    Fold coverage     59× 454, 500× SOLiD
MIGS-30    Assemblers     Newbler 2.0.01.14, Custom
MIGS-32    Gene calling method     Prodigal, tRNAScan-SE
    Genome Database release     Genbank
    Genbank ID     379005763     379002962
    Genbank Date of Release     2012-02-12
    GOLD ID     Gi05801
    Project relevance     Biotechnology

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

The initial culture was obtained in 2003 from the Leibniz Institute-German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures (DSMZ), and grown anaerobically in stoppered, 150ml glass culture bottles at 90°C. This culture was stored at 4°C for an extended period (six years) before being sampled for this study. A set of ten-fold dilutions of an actively growing culture (~108 cells/ml) was carried out and growth was monitored over a five-day period. All cultures were grown at 90°C without shaking in 200ml modified DSM 390 medium, using 1g tryptone, 1g yeast extract, pH 7, supplemented with 10mm Na2S2O3 in 1L flasks under a headspace of nitrogen. At day four of growth, a new 400ml aerobic culture was inoculated with 20ml from the penultimate member of the dilution series (10-8) and shaken at 100 rpm, supplemented with 10mM Na2S2O3, and subsequently was used for sequencing. We note that at day five, turbid growth was seen in the final member of the dilution series (10-9 initial dilution). This implies that the initial 10-8 inoculum used for sequencing likely included more than 10 cells. Cell pellets were obtained from the 400ml aerobic culture, frozen at -80°C and suspended in 15ml SNET II lysis buffer (20mM Tris-Cl pH 8, 5mM EDTA, 400mM NaCl, 1% SDS) supplemented with 0.5mg/ml Proteinase K and incubated at 55°C for four hours. DNA was extracted from this digest using an equal volume of Tris-buffered (pH 8) PCI (Phenol:Chloroform:Isoamyl-OH (25:24:1)). Following phase-separation (3220g, 10 min. at 4°C), the resulting aqueous phase was treated with RNase A (25µg/ml) for 30 minutes at 37°C. This reaction was PCI-extracted a second time, followed by CHCl3 extraction of the resulting aqueous phase and a final phase separation as before. DNA was precipitated in an equal volume of isopropyl alcohol at -20°C overnight, followed by centrifugation (3,220 g, 15 min. at 4°C). The resulting pellet was washed in 70% EtOH, pelleted (3220g, 30 min. at 4°C) and aspirated to remove the supernatant. The final DNA pellet was suspended in 1ml TE (50mM Tris-Cl Ph 8, 1 mM EDTA) overnight at room temperature, yielding a final DNA concentration of 0.77 µg/µl.

Genome sequencing and assembly

Sequencing was performed by the UCSC genome sequencing center using both Roche/454 GS/FLX Titanium pyrosequencing and the ABI SOLiD system (mate-pair). Pyrosequencing reads were assembled with 59X coverage exceeding Q40 over 99.95% (2,449,310 bases) of the genome, producing 20 contigs at an N50 of 467,815 bp. This assembly included 24 Sanger reads generated by primer-walking across four of the five encoded CRISPR repeat regions. The resulting maximal base-error rate ( Contigs were assembled to a single scaffold using the mate-pair library generated for use on the ABI SOLiD sequencer. The library was produced with an insert size range of 1000–3,500 bp, and final sequencing yielded 30,631,205 read pairs of 25 bp read length. Those read-pairs were mapped to the 20 pyrosequencing-derived contigs to produce a From::To table of uniquely mapping read-pairs; accumulated for each of the 20×20 contig-pair assignments in each of the three possible relative contig orientations (same, converging or diverging). The scaffold closed easily with these data and yielded a single main chromosome with three major inversions and an extra-chromosomal element.

Genome annotation

Gene prediction and annotation was prepared using the IMG/ER service of the Joint Genome Institute [25], where protein coding genes were identified using Prodigal [26] RNase P RNA [27], SRP RNA and ribosomal RNA(5S, 16S, 23S) were identified by homology to the currently described members using the UCSC Archaeal Genome Browser (archaea.ucsc.edu) [28]. Annotation of transfer RNA (tRNA) genes was established using tRNAscan-SE [29], supplemented with manual curation of non-canonical introns. C/D box sRNA genes were identified computationally using Snoscan [30] with extensions supported by transcriptional sequencing [51]. H/ACA-like sRNA genes were identified using transcriptionally-supported homology modeling of experimentally validated sRNA transcripts [31]. CRISPR repeats were identified using CRT [32] or CRISPR-finder [33], with strandedness established by transcriptional sequencing.

Genome properties

The properties and overall statistics of the genome are summarized in Table 3, Table 4, Table 5, Table 6, and Table 7. The single main chromosome (55.08% GC content) has a total size of 2,436,033 bp. Ultra-deep mate-pair sequencing has revealed three regions of the genome that are present in an inverted orientation within a minority of the population (Table 7). The genome also includes an extra-chromosomal element of 16, 887 bp (50.58% GC), that encodes 35 predicted protein-coding genes. Of those genes, seven have an annotated function and the remaining 28 genes are annotated as hypothetical proteins. Of the seven annotated genes, three are coded with viral functions [34].
Table 3

Nucleotide content and gene count levels of the main chromosomea

Attribute   Value   % of total
Genome size (bp)   243,6033   100
DNA Coding region (bp)   2,164,251   88.84
DNA G+C content (bp)   1,341,816   55.08
Total genes   2,980   100
RNA genes   145   4.74
rRNA operons   1
Protein-coding genes   2,800   93.96
Genes in paralog clusters   1,214   40.74
Genes assigned to COGs   1,797   60.30
Genes assigned PFAM domains   1,719   57.68
Genes with signal peptides   794   26.64
Genes with transmembrane helices   646   21.68
CRISPR arrays   5   % of total

aThe ECE (16,887 bp) contains 35 genes, has a 50.58% G+C content, and is excluded from this table. Total gene count includes 35 pseudogenes.

Table 4

Number of genes associated with the 25 general COG functional categories

Code     Value   %agea     Description
J     163   8.53     Translation
A     5   0.26     RNA processing and modification
K     112   5.86     Transcription
L     100   5.23     Replication, recombination and repair
B     4   0.21     Chromatin structure and dynamics
D     22   1.15     Cell cycle control, mitosis and meiosis
Y     NA     Nuclear structure
V     15   0.78     Defense mechanisms
T     45   2.35     Signal transduction mechanisms
M     47   2.46     Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
N     4   0.21     Cell motility
Z     1   0.05     Cytoskeleton
W     NA     Extracellular structures
U     22   1.15     Intracellular trafficking and secretion
O     87   4.55     Post-translational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C     182   9.52     Energy production and conversion
G     82   4.29     Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E     159   8.32     Amino acid transport and metabolism
F     58   3.04     Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H     115   6.02     Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I     60   3.14     Lipid transport and metabolism
P     83   4.34     Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q     26   1.36     Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R     323   16.90     General function prediction only
S     196   10.26     Function unknown
-     1144     Not in COGs
Table 5

Sixteen largest regions present in and absent in

Region coordinates (kb)    PaRep type      Gene cluster
2,420 - 0,020    paREP2
420 - 440    paREP1/8
485 - 530    paREP2
682 - 695    paREP2
887 - 900      ThiW
955 - 985    paREP1/8      CRISPR cassette
1,090 - 1,120    paREP1      Cobalamin biosynthesis cassette
1,160 - 1,180      CO dehydrogenase
1,235 - 1,250    paREP1/8
1,440 - 1, 460    paREP1/8
1,540 - 1,565      aerobic terminal cytochromes
1,672 - 1,690    paREP6
1,715 - 1,735      CO dehydrogenase
1,780 - 1,795    paREP1
1,825 - 1,870    paREP2
2,300 - 2,385      ThiC
Table 6

Summary of genome: one chromosome and one extra-chromosomal element

Label   Size (bp)    Topology    INSDC identifier
Chromosome (Chr)   2,436,033    circular    NC_016885.1
Extra-chromosomal Element (ECE)   16,887    circular    NC_016886.1
Table 7

Genomic inversions present within the sampled population

Inversion name    Coordinates
Start   End    Length    Frequency
   GluDH50,930   223,540    172,611    0.17
   RAMP/paREP932,090   955,719    23,630    0.18
   C81,686,376   1,708,299    21,924    0.35

aMinority inversion frequency established as described previously [24].

aThe total is based on the 1,911 COG assignments made across 1,701 protein-coding genes with at least one COG assignment. The Not in COGs category is made up of 1,099 hypothetical protein coding genes and 145 RNA genes. The 35 genes in the ECE are excluded from this analysis.

aThe ECE (16,887 bp) contains 35 genes, has a 50.58% G+C content, and is excluded from this table. Total gene count includes 35 pseudogenes. aMinority inversion frequency established as described previously [24]. aThe total is based on the 1,911 COG assignments made across 1,701 protein-coding genes with at least one COG assignment. The Not in COGs category is made up of 1,099 hypothetical protein coding genes and 145 RNA genes. The 35 genes in the ECE are excluded from this analysis. The majority of the genome is structurally syntenic to the genome of and genes found in both species show an average of approximately 96% nucleotide identity. The genome is approximately 15% larger than with the former encoding 536 more (2835 - 2299) open reading frames (ORFs) predicted to be genes. Vast stretches of sequence space are syntenic between the two species (Figure 2, regions in blue), broken by relatively few regions that appear to arise from either gene loss in or genomic expansion in , possibly a result of the numerous paREP elements present in these genomes (Figure 2). These repetitive regions are difficult to assemble, and some are putative transposons (PaREP2b, for example).
Figure 2

Genomic alignment of with . Outer ring: (+ strand); Inner ring: (- strand). Inter-species alignment blocks shown in light blue and gold (inverted orientation). Intra-species genomic inversions shown as arcs of different colors along outer ring: red: C8 inversion (red); Glutamate Dehydrogenase (GluDH) inversion (green); RAMP/paREP inversion (blue). Positions of paREP elements shown as ticks inside outer ring: paREP1 (red); paREP2b (blue); paREP7 (green). Positions of selected genes which are present in and missing in are shown in text inside outer ring: thiamine biosynthesis genes (ThiW and ThiC); CRISPR Cassette(CAS); cobalamin cluster; CO dehydrogenase(COdh); and the aerobic cytochrome clusters(Cyto-c). Aligned regions smaller than 500 nucleotides have been removed for clarity.

Genomic alignment of with . Outer ring: (+ strand); Inner ring: (- strand). Inter-species alignment blocks shown in light blue and gold (inverted orientation). Intra-species genomic inversions shown as arcs of different colors along outer ring: red: C8 inversion (red); Glutamate Dehydrogenase (GluDH) inversion (green); RAMP/paREP inversion (blue). Positions of paREP elements shown as ticks inside outer ring: paREP1 (red); paREP2b (blue); paREP7 (green). Positions of selected genes which are present in and missing in are shown in text inside outer ring: thiamine biosynthesis genes (ThiW and ThiC); CRISPR Cassette(CAS); cobalamin cluster; CO dehydrogenase(COdh); and the aerobic cytochrome clusters(Cyto-c). Aligned regions smaller than 500 nucleotides have been removed for clarity. We can identify specific genes and gene clusters that are present in but are missing in . Notably, the cobalamin synthetic cluster and two thiamine synthetic genes (ThiW and ThiC) are absent in . The terminal cytochrome cluster associated with aerobic respiration [35] is also absent in as expected from an obligate anaerobe. Among the 16 largest deletions in (relative to ), four are associated with paREP2 genes, six with paREP1/8, and one with paREP6 (Table 5).

Conclusion

Genomic sequencing and assembly of has yielded a complete genome and an extra-chromosomal element. The main chromosome is largely syntenic to and contains a number of gene clusters that are absent in that species. This is of particular interest considering that these species were isolated on opposite sides of the Eurasian continent; was isolated in Japan, while was isolated in an arsenic-rich anaerobic pool in Italy. The synteny that has been retained between the genomes of and allows a close examination of gene gain or loss events in the genetic history of these two species. is missing the gene clusters that support cobalamin and thiamine synthesis, and it is missing the aerobic cytochrome cluster. Given that and the next closest member in the clade, have both retained these capabilities; the most parsimonious explanation is gene loss in . Because these genes are located at disparate positions in the genome, it would further appear that these losses are the result of multiple events in the evolutionary history of . Within this genome, 145 non-coding RNA genes are described. These include a single operon encoding 16S and 23S ribosomal RNA, the associated 5S rRNA, the 7S signal recognition particle(SRP), and the RNase P RNA. There are 47 annotated tRNA genes, plus a single tRNA pseudogene. Also included are 83 predicted C/D box sRNA genes and nine additional H/ACA-like sRNA, each of which has been transcriptionally validated [31]. The non-coding RNA content of the genome has become the most extensively annotated among crenarchaeal genomes to date. The use of a not-quite-clonal cell population for DNA isolation, coupled with ultra-deep sequencing has provided a view of three major inversions that are each present in over 17% of the sample population. The boundaries of one of these inversions are defined by an inverted repeat encoding a duplication of glutamate dehydrogenase (GluDH). Notably, this duplication appears to be present in each of the currently sequenced members, suggesting that those genomes may also host similar inversions. A second inversion has at its termini another inverted duplication, encoding a gene associated with one of the paREP members and a CRISPR-associated gene. It remains unclear if these common structural variants impart a physiological advantage, and if so, how the variation provides utility to its host. Based on our expanded genome diversity observations, we suggest that avoiding the use of a strictly clonal population for sequencing purposes can provide a significant benefit to understanding both the biology of the host and a clearer understanding of the genome dynamics of the species.
  27 in total

1.  Validation of publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSEM. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.747

2.  Regulation of the aerobic respiratory chain in the facultatively aerobic and hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrobaculum oguniense.

Authors:  Takuro Nunoura; Yoshihiko Sako; Takayoshi Wakagi; Aritsune Uchida
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.777

3.  Complete genome sequence of strain 1860, a crenarchaeon of the genus Pyrobaculum able to grow with various electron acceptors.

Authors:  Andrey V Mardanov; Vadim M Gumerov; Galina B Slobodkina; Alexey V Beletsky; Elizaveta A Bonch-Osmolovskaya; Nikolai V Ravin; Konstantin G Skryabin
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Discovery of Pyrobaculum small RNA families with atypical pseudouridine guide RNA features.

Authors:  David L Bernick; Patrick P Dennis; Matthias Höchsmann; Todd M Lowe
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 4.942

5.  Archaeal proviruses TKV4 and MVV extend the PRD1-adenovirus lineage to the phylum Euryarchaeota.

Authors:  Mart Krupovic; Dennis H Bamford
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 3.616

6.  Reclassification of the crenarchael orders and families in accordance with 16S rRNA sequence data.

Authors:  S Burggraf; H Huber; K O Stetter
Journal:  Int J Syst Bacteriol       Date:  1997-07

7.  Respiration of arsenate and selenate by hyperthermophilic archaea.

Authors:  R Huber; M Sacher; A Vollmann; H Huber; D Rose
Journal:  Syst Appl Microbiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.022

8.  Jalview Version 2--a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench.

Authors:  Andrew M Waterhouse; James B Procter; David M A Martin; Michèle Clamp; Geoffrey J Barton
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Transcriptional map of respiratory versatility in the hyperthermophilic crenarchaeon Pyrobaculum aerophilum.

Authors:  Aaron E Cozen; Matthew T Weirauch; Katherine S Pollard; David L Bernick; Joshua M Stuart; Todd M Lowe
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  The UCSC Archaeal Genome Browser: 2012 update.

Authors:  Patricia P Chan; Andrew D Holmes; Andrew M Smith; Danny Tran; Todd M Lowe
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  6 in total

1.  Bipartite Network Analysis of the Archaeal Virosphere: Evolutionary Connections between Viruses and Capsidless Mobile Elements.

Authors:  Jaime Iranzo; Eugene V Koonin; David Prangishvili; Mart Krupovic
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 5.103

2.  A virus of hyperthermophilic archaea with a unique architecture among DNA viruses.

Authors:  Elena Ilka Rensen; Tomohiro Mochizuki; Emmanuelle Quemin; Stefan Schouten; Mart Krupovic; David Prangishvili
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Metagenomic evaluation of bacterial and archaeal diversity in the geothermal hot springs of manikaran, India.

Authors:  Sonu Bhatia; Navneet Batra; Ashish Pathak; Stefan J Green; Amit Joshi; Ashvini Chauhan
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2015-02-19

4.  Nucleic and Amino Acid Sequences Support Structure-Based Viral Classification.

Authors:  Robert M Sinclair; Janne J Ravantti; Dennis H Bamford
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  Integrated mobile genetic elements in Thaumarchaeota.

Authors:  Mart Krupovic; Kira S Makarova; Yuri I Wolf; Sofia Medvedeva; David Prangishvili; Patrick Forterre; Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 5.491

6.  Methylation guide RNA evolution in archaea: structure, function and genomic organization of 110 C/D box sRNA families across six Pyrobaculum species.

Authors:  Lauren M Lui; Andrew V Uzilov; David L Bernick; Andrea Corredor; Todd M Lowe; Patrick P Dennis
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 16.971

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.