Literature DB >> 27846640

Cardiac Stress Test Trends Among US Patients Younger Than 65 Years, 2005-2012.

Vinay Kini1, Fenton H McCarthy2, Elias Dayoub3, Steven M Bradley4, Frederick A Masoudi5, P Michael Ho4, Peter W Groeneveld6.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: After a period of rapid growth, use of cardiac stress testing has recently decreased among Medicare beneficiaries and in a large integrated health system. However, it is not known whether declines in cardiac stress testing are universal or are confined to certain populations.
OBJECTIVE: To determine trends in rates of cardiac stress testing among a large and diverse cohort of commercially insured patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A serial cross-sectional study with time trends was conducted using administrative claims from all members aged 25 to 64 years belonging to a large, national managed care company from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2012. Linear trends in rates were determined using negative binomial regression models with procedure count as the dependent variable, calendar quarter as the key independent variable, and the size of the population as a logged offset term. Data analysis was performed from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2012. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Age- and sex-adjusted rates of cardiac stress tests per calendar quarter (reported as number of tests per 100 000 person-years).
RESULTS: A total of 2 085 591 cardiac stress tests were performed among 32 921 838 persons (mean [SD] age, 43.2 [10.9] years; 16 625 528 women [50.5%] and 16 296 310 [49.5%] men; 7 604 945 nonwhite [23.1%]). There was a 3.0% increase in rates of cardiac stress testing from 2005 (3486 tests; 95% CI, 3458-3514) to 2012 (3589 tests; 95% CI, 3559-3619; P = .01 for linear trend). Use of nuclear single-photon emission computed tomography decreased by 14.9% from 2005 (1907 tests; 95% CI, 1888-1926) to 2012 (1623 tests; 95% CI, 1603-1643; P = .03). Use of stress echocardiography increased by 27.8% from 2005 (709 tests; 95% CI, 697-721) to 2012 (906 tests; 95% CI, 894 to 920; P < .001). Use of exercise electrocardiography increased by 12.5% from 2005 (861 tests; 95% CI, 847-873) to 2012 (969 tests; 95% CI, 953-985; P < .001). Use of other stress testing modalities increased 65.5% from 2006 (55 tests; 95% CI, 51-59) to 2012 (91 tests; 95% CI, 87-95; P < .001). For individuals aged 25 to 34 years, rates of cardiac stress testing increased 59.1% from 2005 (543 tests; 95% CI, 532-554) to 2012 (864 tests; 95% CI, 852-876; P < .001). For individuals aged 55 to 64 years, rates of cardiac stress testing decreased by 12.3% from 2005 (7894 tests; 95% CI, 7820-7968) to 2012 (6923 tests; 95% CI, 6853-6993; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In contrast to declines in the use of cardiac stress testing in some health care systems, we observed a small increase in its use among a nationally representative cohort of commercially insured patients. Our findings suggest that observed trends in the use of cardiac stress testing may have been driven more by unique characteristics of populations and health systems than national efforts to reduce the overuse of testing.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27846640      PMCID: PMC6537591          DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.3153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Cardiol            Impact factor:   14.676


  14 in total

1.  Medicare services provided by cardiologists in the United States: 1999-2008.

Authors:  Bruce W Andrus; H Gilbert Welch
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2012-01-10

2.  Hospital industry consolidation--still more to come?

Authors:  Leemore Dafny
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Geographic variation in health care spending in the United States: insights from an Institute of Medicine report.

Authors:  Joseph P Newhouse; Alan M Garber
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Recent reimbursement changes and their effect on hospital and private office use of myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  David C Levin; Laurence Parker; Charles M Intenzo; Vijay M Rao
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.532

5.  ACC/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HRS/IAC/Mended Hearts/NASCI/RSNA/SAIP/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/SNMMI 2014 health policy statement on use of noninvasive cardiovascular imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Clinical Quality Committee.

Authors:  Daniel B Mark; Jeffrey L Anderson; Jeffrey A Brinker; James A Brophy; Donald E Casey; Russell R Cross; Daniel Edmundowicz; Rory Hachamovitch; Mark A Hlatky; Jill E Jacobs; Suzette Jaskie; Kevin G Kett; Vinay Malhotra; Frederick A Masoudi; Michael V McConnell; Geoffrey D Rubin; Leslee J Shaw; M Eugene Sherman; Steve Stanko; R Parker Ward
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Population trends from 2000-2011 in nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging use.

Authors:  Edward J McNulty; Yun-Yi Hung; Lucy M Almers; Alan S Go; Robert W Yeh
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Geographic variation in cardiovascular procedure use among Medicare fee-for-service vs Medicare Advantage beneficiaries.

Authors:  Daniel D Matlock; Peter W Groeneveld; Steve Sidney; Susan Shetterly; Glenn Goodrich; Karen Glenn; Stan Xu; Lin Yang; Steven A Farmer; Kristi Reynolds; Andrea E Cassidy-Bushrow; Tracy Lieu; Denise M Boudreau; Robert T Greenlee; Jeffrey Tom; Suma Vupputuri; Kenneth F Adams; David H Smith; Margaret J Gunter; Alan S Go; David J Magid
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Low diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography.

Authors:  Manesh R Patel; Eric D Peterson; David Dai; J Matthew Brennan; Rita F Redberg; H Vernon Anderson; Ralph G Brindis; Pamela S Douglas
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Repeat testing among Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  H Gilbert Welch; Kevin J Hayes; Carol Frost
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2012-12-10

10.  Physician decision making and trends in the use of cardiac stress testing in the United States: an analysis of repeated cross-sectional data.

Authors:  Joseph A Ladapo; Saul Blecker; Pamela S Douglas
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Imaging to Assess Ischemic Heart Disease in Women.

Authors:  Kaartiga Sivanesan; Subhi J Al'Aref; James K Min; Jessica M Peña; Fay Lin; Erica C Jones
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 5.113

2.  Hemodynamic response and safety of vasodilator stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with permanent pacemakers or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

Authors:  Lauren Miller; Sergei Airapetov; Ajay Pillai; Gautham Kalahasty; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; W Gregory Hundley; Cory R Trankle
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Clinical Outcomes After Cardiac Stress Testing Among US Patients Younger Than 65 Years.

Authors:  Vinay Kini; Elias J Dayoub; Paul L Hess; Lucas N Marzec; Frederick A Masoudi; P Michael Ho; Peter W Groeneveld
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 4.  The new clinical standard of integrated quadruple stress echocardiography with ABCD protocol.

Authors:  Eugenio Picano; Quirino Ciampi; Karina Wierzbowska-Drabik; Mădălina-Loredana Urluescu; Doralisa Morrone; Clara Carpeggiani
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 2.062

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.