P Boyer1, C Bouthors, T Delcourt, O Stewart, F Hamida, G Mylle, P Massin. 1. Orthopaedic Department, Bichat Hospital, Assistance Publique/Hôpitaux de Paris, University Paris VII, 46 rue Henri Huchard, 75018, Paris, France, patrickboyer@free.fr.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the functional and structural outcomes of 2 techniques for double-row, suture-bridging cuff repair. METHODS: A consecutive series of 73 patients who underwent arthroscopic, double-row, suture-bridge primary rotator cuff repair of full-thickness supraspinatus tear were evaluated. Thirty-eight shoulders were repaired by the arthroscopic, tied, suture-bridging technique (group A), and 35 shoulders by knot-less bridging with suture tape material (group B). Constant scores, pain, range of motion, strength, and complications were measured after a minimum follow-up period of 12 months post-operatively. Structural integrity of the repairs was evaluated systematically by either magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography arthrography. RESULTS: Median follow-up after surgery was 29 (23-32) months in group A, and 21 (12-23) months in group B. Mean pain relief, range of motion, strength, and constant score improved significantly in both groups. No statistical differences were found between groups in the post-operative period. According to control imaging, the re-tear rate trended to be higher in group A (23.4 %) than in group B (17.1 %), although not significantly. CONCLUSION: Both bridging repair techniques achieved successful functional outcomes. In terms of structural outcome, the knot-less tape-bridging construct showed a lower but not significant re-tear rate. Longer follow-up is needed to confirm these results and to evaluate potential differences between the two techniques. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: A prospective, non-randomized, comparative study, Level III.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the functional and structural outcomes of 2 techniques for double-row, suture-bridging cuff repair. METHODS: A consecutive series of 73 patients who underwent arthroscopic, double-row, suture-bridge primary rotator cuff repair of full-thickness supraspinatus tear were evaluated. Thirty-eight shoulders were repaired by the arthroscopic, tied, suture-bridging technique (group A), and 35 shoulders by knot-less bridging with suture tape material (group B). Constant scores, pain, range of motion, strength, and complications were measured after a minimum follow-up period of 12 months post-operatively. Structural integrity of the repairs was evaluated systematically by either magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography arthrography. RESULTS: Median follow-up after surgery was 29 (23-32) months in group A, and 21 (12-23) months in group B. Mean pain relief, range of motion, strength, and constant score improved significantly in both groups. No statistical differences were found between groups in the post-operative period. According to control imaging, the re-tear rate trended to be higher in group A (23.4 %) than in group B (17.1 %), although not significantly. CONCLUSION: Both bridging repair techniques achieved successful functional outcomes. In terms of structural outcome, the knot-less tape-bridging construct showed a lower but not significant re-tear rate. Longer follow-up is needed to confirm these results and to evaluate potential differences between the two techniques. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: A prospective, non-randomized, comparative study, Level III.
Authors: Paul M Sethi; Benjamin C Noonan; James Cunningham; Evan Shreck; Seth Miller Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Date: 2010-08-03 Impact factor: 3.019
Authors: Jonathan T Nassos; Neal S ElAttrache; Michael J Angel; James E Tibone; Orr Limpisvasti; Thay Q Lee Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Date: 2011-07-22 Impact factor: 3.019
Authors: Stephan Pauly; Bettina Kieser; Alexander Schill; Christian Gerhardt; Markus Scheibel Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2010-06-11 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: Maristella F Saccomanno; Gianpiero Cazzato; Mario Fodale; Giuseppe Sircana; Giuseppe Milano Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2015-01-04 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Jourdan M Cancienne; Stephen F Brockmeier; Scott A Rodeo; Chris Young; Brian C Werner Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2016-10-13 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Jason A Boyd; Spero G Karas; Ryan J Urchek; Kevin X Farley; Albert T Anastasio; Michael B Gottschalk Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Date: 2020-01-13 Impact factor: 3.019