Literature DB >> 31948833

Factors influencing operative time in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a comparison of knotless single-row vs. transosseous equivalent dual-row techniques.

Jason A Boyd1, Spero G Karas2, Ryan J Urchek2, Kevin X Farley2, Albert T Anastasio2, Michael B Gottschalk2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the widespread use of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (aRCR), there remains considerable debate on the benefits of a dual-row vs. a single-row (SR) repair technique. This study compares operative time of a knotless SR technique with transosseous equivalent (TOE) dual-row technique for aRCR and defines patient-specific factors that affect operative time.
METHODS: Data from 118 patients who underwent aRCR with a knotless SR technique was compared with data from 95 patients who underwent aRCR with a TOE technique by a single surgeon between 2014 and 2018. Baseline patient demographic information and operative time were recorded and compared between the 2 groups. Subgroup analysis was performed to determine if demographic information or tear size influenced operative time.
RESULTS: The average operative time in the SR group was 75.68 minutes and the average operative time in the TOE group was 89.24 minutes (P < .001). When controlling for all concomitant procedures, the operative time in the TOE group was 8.1 minutes longer than the SR group (P = .029). Average tear size in an anterior-posterior direction was larger in the TOE group vs. the SR group, 26.09 mm vs. 15.18 mm (P < .001).
CONCLUSION: When controlling for concomitant procedures, a knotless, TOE dual-row technique for aRCR adds an average of 8 minutes' operative time compared with a knotless SR technique. This was despite a significantly larger tear size in the TOE group.
Copyright © 2019 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Rotator cuff; arthroscopy; operative time; shoulder; sports medicine; tendon repair

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31948833      PMCID: PMC7351607          DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.10.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  11 in total

1.  Repair integrity and functional outcomes after arthroscopic suture-bridge rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Kyung Cheon Kim; Hyun Dae Shin; Woo Yong Lee
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Biomechanical comparison of a single-row versus double-row suture anchor technique for rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  David H Kim; Neal S Elattrache; James E Tibone; Bong-Jae Jun; Sergai N DeLaMora; Ronald S Kvitne; Thay Q Lee
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Biomechanical evaluation of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: double-row compared with single-row fixation.

Authors:  C Benjamin Ma; Lyn Comerford; Joseph Wilson; Christian M Puttlitz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  A multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing single-row with double-row fixation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Peter L C Lapner; Elham Sabri; Kawan Rakhra; Sheila McRae; Jeff Leiter; Kimberly Bell; Peter Macdonald
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Arthroscopic double-row cuff repair with suture-bridging: a structural and functional comparison of two techniques.

Authors:  P Boyer; C Bouthors; T Delcourt; O Stewart; F Hamida; G Mylle; P Massin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Comparison of implant cost and surgical time in arthroscopic transosseous and transosseous equivalent rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Eric M Black; Luke S Austin; Alexa Narzikul; Adam J Seidl; Kelly Martens; Mark D Lazarus
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With a Knotless Suture Bridge Technique: Functional and Radiological Outcomes After a Minimum Follow-Up of 5 Years.

Authors:  Ruben Dukan; Pauline Ledinot; Julia Donadio; Patrick Boyer
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 8.  Does the literature confirm superior clinical results in radiographically healed rotator cuffs after rotator cuff repair?

Authors:  Mark A Slabaugh; Shane J Nho; Robert C Grumet; Joseph B Wilson; Shane T Seroyer; Rachel M Frank; Anthony A Romeo; Matthew T Provencher; Nikhil N Verma
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Arthroscopic knotless-anchor rotator cuff repair: a clinical and radiological evaluation.

Authors:  Konstantin Hug; Christian Gerhardt; Hendrik Haneveld; Markus Scheibel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-05-04       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Predictors of outcomes after arthroscopic transosseous equivalent rotator cuff repair in 155 cases: a propensity score weighted analysis of knotted and knotless self-reinforcing repair techniques at a minimum of 2 years.

Authors:  Peter J Millett; Chris Espinoza; Marilee P Horan; Charles P Ho; Ryan J Warth; Grant J Dornan; J Christoph Katthagen
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.