Literature DB >> 17606793

The outcome and structural integrity of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with use of the double-row suture anchor technique.

Laurent Lafosse1, Roman Brozska, Bruno Toussaint, Reuben Gobezie.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The reported rate of failure after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair has varied widely. The influence of the repair technique on the failure rates and functional outcomes after open or arthroscopic rotator cuff repair remains controversial. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the functional and anatomic results of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs performed with the double-row suture anchor technique on the basis of computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging arthrography in order to determine the postoperative integrity of the repairs.
METHODS: A prospective series of 105 consecutive shoulders undergoing arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair of the supraspinatus or a combination of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus were evaluated at a minimum of two years after surgery. The evaluation included a routine history and physical examination as well as determination of the preoperative and postoperative strength, pain, range of motion, and Constant scores. All shoulders had a preoperative and postoperative computed tomography arthrogram (103 shoulders) or magnetic resonance imaging arthrogram (two shoulders).
RESULTS: There were thirty-six small rotator cuff tears, forty-seven large isolated supraspinatus or combined supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendon tears, and twenty-two massive rotator cuff tears. The mean Constant score (and standard deviation) was 43.2+/-15.1 points (range, 8 to 83 points) preoperatively and 80.1+/-11.1 points (range, 46 to 100 points) postoperatively. Twelve of the 105 repairs failed. Intact rotator cuff repairs were associated with significantly increased strength and active range of motion.
CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic repair of a rotator cuff tear with use of the double-row suture anchor technique results in a much lower rate of failure than has previously been reported in association with either open or arthroscopic repair methods. Patients with an intact rotator cuff repair have better pain relief than those with a failed repair. After repair, large and massive rotator cuff tears result in more postoperative weakness than small tears do.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17606793     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  82 in total

1.  Effect of implanting a soft tissue autograft in a central-third patellar tendon defect: biomechanical and histological comparisons.

Authors:  Kirsten R C Kinneberg; Marc T Galloway; David L Butler; Jason T Shearn
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Biologic augmentation of rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Scott R Montgomery; Frank A Petrigliano; Seth C Gamradt
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2011-12

Review 3.  Rotator cuff: biology and current arthroscopic techniques.

Authors:  Olaf Lorbach; Marc Tompkins
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Extracorporeal shock wave therapy is not useful after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Jae Yoon Kim; Jae Sung Lee; Chi Woo Park
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Single versus double-row repair of the rotator cuff: does double-row repair with improved anatomical and biomechanical characteristics lead to better clinical outcome?

Authors:  Stephan Pauly; Christian Gerhardt; Jianhai Chen; Markus Scheibel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  [Controversies in the therapy of rotator cuff tears. Operative or nonoperative treatment, open or arthroscopic repair?].

Authors:  O Lorbach
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 7.  Rotator cuff tears: pathology and repair.

Authors:  Hemang Yadav; Shane Nho; Anthony Romeo; John D MacGillivray
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Rotator cuff injury: still a clinical controversy?

Authors:  P Hardy; S Sanghavi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  An in vitro analysis of the mechanical properties of 16 arthroscopic knots.

Authors:  Keith M Baumgarten; Michael D Brodt; Matthew J Silva; Rick W Wright
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Critical period and risk factors for retear following arthroscopic repair of the rotator cuff.

Authors:  Johannes Barth; Kevin Andrieu; Elias Fotiadis; Gerjon Hannink; Renaud Barthelemy; Mo Saffarini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.