Literature DB >> 23403430

Monte Carlo simulations based on phase 1 studies predict target attainment of ceftobiprole in nosocomial pneumonia patients: a validation study.

Anouk E Muller1, Anne H Schmitt-Hoffmann, Nieko Punt, Johan W Mouton.   

Abstract

Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) of antimicrobial dosage regimens during drug development to derive predicted target attainment values is frequently used to choose the optimal dose for the treatment of patients in phase 2 and 3 studies. A criticism is that pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter estimates and variability in healthy volunteers are smaller than those in patients. In this study, the initial estimates of exposure from MCS were compared with actual exposure data in patients treated with ceftobiprole in a phase 3 nosocomial-pneumonia (NP) study (NTC00210964). Results of MCS using population PK data from ceftobiprole derived from 12 healthy volunteers were used (J. W. Mouton, A. Schmitt-Hoffmann, S. Shapiro, N. Nashed, N. C. Punt, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:1713-1718, 2004). Actual individual exposures in patients were derived after building a population pharmacokinetic model and were used to calculate the individual exposure to ceftobiprole (the percentage of time the unbound concentration exceeds the MIC [percent fT > MIC]) for a range of MIC values. For the ranges of percent fT > MIC used to determine the dosage schedule in the phase 3 NP study, the MCS using data from a single phase 1 study in healthy volunteers accurately predicted the actual clinical exposure to ceftobiprole. The difference at 50% fT > MIC at an MIC of 4 mg/liter was 3.5% for PK-sampled patients. For higher values of percent fT > MIC and MICs, the MCS slightly underestimated the target attainment, probably due to extreme values in the PK profile distribution used in the simulations. The probability of target attainment based on MCS in healthy volunteers adequately predicted the actual exposures in a patient population, including severely ill patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23403430      PMCID: PMC3632954          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02292-12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  9 in total

Review 1.  Antimicrobial pharmacodynamics: critical interactions of 'bug and drug'.

Authors:  George L Drusano
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 60.633

2.  Use of Monte Carlo simulations to select therapeutic doses and provisional breakpoints of BAL9141.

Authors:  Johan W Mouton; Anne Schmitt-Hoffmann; Stuart Shapiro; Norman Nashed; Nieko C Punt
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  A retrospective analysis using Monte Carlo simulation to evaluate recommended ceftazidime dosing regimens in healthy volunteers, patients with cystic fibrosis, and patients in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Johan W Mouton; Nieko Punt; Alexander A Vinks
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.393

Review 4.  The role of pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics in setting clinical MIC breakpoints: the EUCAST approach.

Authors:  J W Mouton; D F J Brown; P Apfalter; R Cantón; C G Giske; M Ivanova; A P MacGowan; A Rodloff; C-J Soussy; M Steinbakk; G Kahlmeter
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 8.067

5.  Pharmacodynamics of a new cephalosporin, PPI-0903 (TAK-599), active against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in murine thigh and lung infection models: identification of an in vivo pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic target.

Authors:  D Andes; W A Craig
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Monte Carlo simulations: maximizing antibiotic pharmacokinetic data to optimize clinical practice for critically ill patients.

Authors:  Jason A Roberts; Carl M J Kirkpatrick; Jeffrey Lipman
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 7.  Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters: rationale for antibacterial dosing of mice and men.

Authors:  W A Craig
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  Probability of target attainment for ceftobiprole as derived from a population pharmacokinetic analysis of 150 subjects.

Authors:  Thomas P Lodise; Rienk Pypstra; James B Kahn; Bindu P Murthy; Hui C Kimko; Karen Bush; Gary J Noel; George L Drusano
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-03-26       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Population pharmacokinetic analysis of ceftobiprole for treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections.

Authors:  Holly Kimko; Bindu Murthy; Xu Xu; Partha Nandy; Richard Strauss; Gary J Noel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 5.191

  9 in total
  12 in total

1.  Rationale for eliminating Staphylococcus breakpoints for β-lactam agents other than penicillin, oxacillin or cefoxitin, and ceftaroline.

Authors:  Jennifer Dien Bard; Janet A Hindler; Howard S Gold; Brandi Limbago
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Evaluating In Vivo-In Vitro Correlation Using a Bayesian Approach.

Authors:  Junshan Qiu; Marilyn Martinez; Ram Tiwari
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 3.  Ceftobiprole medocaril: a review of its use in patients with hospital- or community-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  Yahiya Y Syed
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Exposure to ceftobiprole is associated with microbiological eradication and clinical cure in patients with nosocomial pneumonia.

Authors:  A E Muller; N Punt; J W Mouton
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  A phase 3 randomized double-blind comparison of ceftobiprole medocaril versus ceftazidime plus linezolid for the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  Samir S Awad; Alejandro H Rodriguez; Yin-Ching Chuang; Zsuszanna Marjanek; Alex J Pareigis; Gilmar Reis; Thomas W L Scheeren; Alejandro S Sánchez; Xin Zhou; Mikaël Saulay; Marc Engelhardt
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 6.  Individualised antibiotic dosing for patients who are critically ill: challenges and potential solutions.

Authors:  Jason A Roberts; Mohd H Abdul-Aziz; Jeffrey Lipman; Johan W Mouton; Alexander A Vinks; Timothy W Felton; William W Hope; Andras Farkas; Michael N Neely; Jerome J Schentag; George Drusano; Otto R Frey; Ursula Theuretzbacher; Joseph L Kuti
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 25.071

7.  Ceftolozane/tazobactam pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic-derived dose justification for phase 3 studies in patients with nosocomial pneumonia.

Authors:  Alan J Xiao; Benjamin W Miller; Jennifer A Huntington; David P Nicolau
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 3.126

Review 8.  Pharmacokinetics and Dosing of Ceftobiprole Medocaril for the Treatment of Hospital- and Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Different Patient Populations.

Authors:  Antonio Torres; Johan Willem Mouton; Federico Pea
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 9.  Ceftobiprole: pharmacokinetics and PK/PD profile.

Authors:  J R Azanza Perea; B Sádaba Díaz de Rada
Journal:  Rev Esp Quimioter       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.553

10.  Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of single- and multiple-dose intravenous ceftobiprole in healthy Chinese participants.

Authors:  Wan-Zhen Li; Hai-Lan Wu; Yuan-Cheng Chen; Bei-Ning Guo; Xiao-Fen Liu; Yu Wang; Ju-Fang Wu; Jing Zhang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.