Literature DB >> 22264314

The role of pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics in setting clinical MIC breakpoints: the EUCAST approach.

J W Mouton1, D F J Brown, P Apfalter, R Cantón, C G Giske, M Ivanova, A P MacGowan, A Rodloff, C-J Soussy, M Steinbakk, G Kahlmeter.   

Abstract

Clinical breakpoints are used in clinical microbiology laboratories to categorize microorganisms as clinically susceptible (S), intermediate (I) or resistant (R) dependent on the quantitative antimicrobial susceptibility as indicated by the MIC value determined in a well-defined standard test system. The laboratory report, with the designations of S, I or R for each antimicrobial agent, provides guidance to clinicians with respect to the potential use of agents in the treatment of patients, and clinical breakpoints should therefore distinguish between patients that are likely or unlikely to respond to antimicrobial treatment. In Europe, clinical breakpoints are set by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST), following a defined procedure. This includes evaluation of efficacy in experimental settings and clinical studies to derive pharmacodynamic targets such as the fAUC/MIC ratio or %fT > MIC required for efficacy, the pharmacokinetic properties of the agent, Monte Carlo simulations to estimate exposures of the antimicrobial agent in the target patient population and commonly used dosing regimens. The probability of target attainment is subsequently determined for a range of pharmacodynamic targets and the results from the Monte Carlo simulations. The breakpoints derived are subsequently evaluated with respect to the wild-type population of the target microorganisms, specific resistance mechanisms and other relevant data. In this paper, we provide an overview of the EUCAST process and considerations for setting pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic breakpoints. These are the breakpoints that in the EUCAST breakpoint tables are referred to as 'non-species-related breakpoints'.
© 2011 The Authors. Clinical Microbiology and Infection © 2011 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22264314     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03752.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect        ISSN: 1198-743X            Impact factor:   8.067


  77 in total

1.  A Systematic Approach to the Selection of the Appropriate Avibactam Concentration for Use with Ceftazidime in Broth Microdilution Susceptibility Testing.

Authors:  Patricia A Bradford; Michael D Huband; Gregory G Stone
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  The role of infection models and PK/PD modelling for optimising care of critically ill patients with severe infections.

Authors:  T Tängdén; V Ramos Martín; T W Felton; E I Nielsen; S Marchand; R J Brüggemann; J B Bulitta; M Bassetti; U Theuretzbacher; B T Tsuji; D W Wareham; L E Friberg; J J De Waele; V H Tam; Jason A Roberts
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Population Pharmacokinetics and Target Attainment of Cefepime in Critically Ill Patients and Guidance for Initial Dosing.

Authors:  Mohammad H Al-Shaer; Michael N Neely; Jiajun Liu; Kartikeya Cherabuddi; Veena Venugopalan; Nathaniel J Rhodes; Kenneth Klinker; Marc H Scheetz; Charles A Peloquin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  CreC Sensor Kinase Activation Enhances Growth of Escherichia coli in the Presence of Cephalosporins and Carbapenems.

Authors:  Yuiko Takebayashi; Emma S Taylor; Sam Whitwam; Matthew B Avison
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Point-Counterpoint: Differences between the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Recommendations for Reporting Antimicrobial Susceptibility Results.

Authors:  Gunnar Kahlmeter; Christian G Giske; Thomas J Kirn; Susan E Sharp
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  What we may expect from novel antibacterial agents in the pipeline with respect to resistance and pharmacodynamic principles.

Authors:  Karen Bush; Malcolm G P Page
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 2.745

7.  In Vitro Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Candida Isolates with the EUCAST Methodology, a New Method for ECOFF Determination.

Authors:  J Meletiadis; I Curfs-Breuker; J F Meis; J W Mouton
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Dosing nomograms for attaining optimum concentrations of meropenem by continuous infusion in critically ill patients with severe gram-negative infections: a pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics-based approach.

Authors:  Federico Pea; Pierluigi Viale; Piergiorgio Cojutti; Mario Furlanut
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing and Tentative Epidemiological Cutoff Values for Five Bacillus Species Relevant for Use as Animal Feed Additives or for Plant Protection.

Authors:  Yvonne Agersø; Birgitte Stuer-Lauridsen; Karin Bjerre; Michelle Geervliet Jensen; Eric Johansen; Mads Bennedsen; Elke Brockmann; Bea Nielsen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 10.  How to optimize the evaluation and use of antibiotics in neonates.

Authors:  Evelyne Jacqz-Aigrain; Florentia Kaguelidou; John N van den Anker
Journal:  Pediatr Clin North Am       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 3.278

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.