Literature DB >> 24514085

Exposure to ceftobiprole is associated with microbiological eradication and clinical cure in patients with nosocomial pneumonia.

A E Muller1, N Punt, J W Mouton.   

Abstract

The percentage of the dosing interval that the non-protein-bound plasma concentration is above the MIC (%fT>MIC) for cephalosporins has been shown to correlate with microbiological outcomes in preclinical studies. However, clinical data are scarce. Using data from a randomized double-blind phase 3 clinical trial, we explored the relationship of ceftobiprole exposure with microbiological and clinical outcomes in patients with nosocomial pneumonia. The individual ceftobiprole exposure was determined for different pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) indices using individual pharmacokinetic data and a previously published population model. The MICs used in the analysis were the highest MICs for any bacterium cultured at baseline or the end of treatment (EOT). Outcomes were microbiological cure at EOT and clinical cure at test of cure (TOC). Multiple logistic regression (MLR) and classification and regression tree (CART) analyses were applied to determine the relationships among exposure, patient characteristics, and outcomes. MLR indicated that the %fT>MIC of ceftobiprole was the best predictor for both microbiological eradication and clinical cure. CART analysis showed a breakpoint value of 51.1% (n = 159; P = 0.0024) for clinical cure, whereas it was 62.2% (n = 251; P < 0.0001) for microbiological eradication. Other factors also contributed, particularly to clinical outcome. These included the difference between VAP and non-VAP patients, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), creatinine clearance, the use of anti-Pseudomonas combination therapy, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE-II) score. There is a strong correlation between microbiological eradication and clinical cure with exposure to ceftobiprole. The %fT>MIC required to result in a favorable clinical outcome is >51% of the dosing interval, which is in line with the values found for microbiological eradication, the comparator ceftazidime, and preclinical models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24514085      PMCID: PMC3993259          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02611-13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  19 in total

Review 1.  Antimicrobial pharmacodynamics: critical interactions of 'bug and drug'.

Authors:  George L Drusano
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 60.633

2.  Pharmacodynamics of tobramycin in patients with cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Johan W Mouton; Nico Jacobs; Harm Tiddens; Alphonsus M Horrevorts
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.803

3.  Pharmacodynamics of fluoroquinolones against Streptococcus pneumoniae in patients with community-acquired respiratory tract infections.

Authors:  P G Ambrose; D M Grasela; T H Grasela; J Passarell; H B Mayer; P F Pierce
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics of antimicrobial therapy: it's not just for mice anymore.

Authors:  Paul G Ambrose; Sujata M Bhavnani; Christopher M Rubino; Arnold Louie; Tawanda Gumbo; Alan Forrest; George L Drusano
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2006-11-27       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Pharmacodynamics of a new cephalosporin, PPI-0903 (TAK-599), active against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in murine thigh and lung infection models: identification of an in vivo pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic target.

Authors:  D Andes; W A Craig
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters: rationale for antibacterial dosing of mice and men.

Authors:  W A Craig
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  Pharmacodynamics of levofloxacin: a new paradigm for early clinical trials.

Authors:  S L Preston; G L Drusano; A L Berman; C L Fowler; A T Chow; B Dornseif; V Reichl; J Natarajan; M Corrado
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-01-14       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Concentration-effect relationship of ceftazidime explains why the time above the MIC is 40 percent for a static effect in vivo.

Authors:  Johan W Mouton; Nieko Punt; Alexander A Vinks
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 9.  Interrelationship between pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in determining dosage regimens for broad-spectrum cephalosporins.

Authors:  W A Craig
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1995 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.803

10.  Efficacy of BAL5788, a prodrug of cephalosporin BAL9141, in a mouse model of acute pneumococcal pneumonia.

Authors:  E Azoulay-Dupuis; J P Bédos; J Mohler; A Schmitt-Hoffmann; M Schleimer; S Shapiro
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  What we may expect from novel antibacterial agents in the pipeline with respect to resistance and pharmacodynamic principles.

Authors:  Karen Bush; Malcolm G P Page
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 2.  Ceftobiprole medocaril: a review of its use in patients with hospital- or community-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  Yahiya Y Syed
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Validation and Application of an HPLC-DAD Method for Routine Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Ceftobiprole.

Authors:  Benjamin Lima; Sandra Bodeau; Marie-Charlotte Quinton; Cyril Leven; Anne-Sophie Lemaire-Hurtel; Youssef Bennis
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Ceftobiprole for the treatment of pneumonia: a European perspective.

Authors:  Adamantia Liapikou; Catia Cillóniz; Antonio Torres
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 4.162

Review 5.  Pharmacokinetics and Dosing of Ceftobiprole Medocaril for the Treatment of Hospital- and Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Different Patient Populations.

Authors:  Antonio Torres; Johan Willem Mouton; Federico Pea
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 6.  Ceftobiprole: pharmacokinetics and PK/PD profile.

Authors:  J R Azanza Perea; B Sádaba Díaz de Rada
Journal:  Rev Esp Quimioter       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.553

Review 7.  Mechanisms of action and antimicrobial activity of ceftobiprole.

Authors:  M I Morosini; M Díez-Aguilar; R Cantón
Journal:  Rev Esp Quimioter       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.553

8.  Genotypic Characterization of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Recovered at Baseline from Phase 3 Pneumonia Clinical Trials for Ceftobiprole.

Authors:  Rodrigo E Mendes; Lalitagauri M Deshpande; Andrew J Costello; David J Farrell; Ronald N Jones; Robert K Flamm
Journal:  Microb Drug Resist       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.431

9.  Treatment of Gram-negative pneumonia in the critical care setting: is the beta-lactam antibiotic backbone broken beyond repair?

Authors:  Matteo Bassetti; Tobias Welte; Richard G Wunderink
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Pharmacokinetics and Target Attainment of Ceftobiprole in Asian and Non-Asian Subjects.

Authors:  A E Muller; N Punt; M Engelhardt; A H Schmitt-Hoffmann; J W Mouton
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev       Date:  2018-05-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.