Literature DB >> 24457339

Rationale for eliminating Staphylococcus breakpoints for β-lactam agents other than penicillin, oxacillin or cefoxitin, and ceftaroline.

Jennifer Dien Bard1, Janet A Hindler, Howard S Gold, Brandi Limbago.   

Abstract

Due to the ongoing concern about the reliability of Staphylococcus breakpoints (interpretive criteria) for other β-lactam agents, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute recently approved the elimination of all breakpoints for antistaphylococcal β-lactams except for penicillin, oxacillin or cefoxitin, and ceftaroline. Routine testing of penicillin and oxacillin or cefoxitin should be used to infer susceptibility for all β-lactams with approved clinical indications for staphylococcal infections. It is critical for laboratories to reject requests for susceptibility testing of other β-lactams against staphylococci and to indicate that susceptibility to these agents can be predicted from the penicillin and oxacillin or cefoxitin results. This article reviews β-lactam resistance mechanisms in staphylococci, current antimicrobial susceptibility testing and reporting recommendations for β-lactams and staphylococci, and microbiologic data and clinical data supporting the elimination of staphylococcal breakpoints for other β-lactam agents.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CLSI breakpoints; Staphylococcus susceptibility; β-lactams and Staphylococcus

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24457339      PMCID: PMC5734619          DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciu043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Infect Dis        ISSN: 1058-4838            Impact factor:   9.079


  71 in total

1.  Outcome of vancomycin treatment in patients with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

Authors:  Sung-Han Kim; Kye-Hyung Kim; Hong-Bin Kim; Nam-Joong Kim; Eui-Chong Kim; Myoung-don Oh; Kang-Won Choe
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Clinical experiences with cefazolin and other cephalosporins in bacterial endocarditis.

Authors:  E L Quinn; D Pohlod; T Madhavan; K Burch; E Fisher; F Cox
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1973-10       Impact factor: 5.226

3.  Susceptibility of "methicillin"-resistant Staphylococcus aureus to 12 antimicrobial agents.

Authors:  P D Hoeprich; E J Benner; F H Kayser
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother (Bethesda)       Date:  1969

4.  Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: comparison of susceptibility testing methods and analysis of mecA-positive susceptible strains.

Authors:  G Sakoulas; H S Gold; L Venkataraman; P C DeGirolami; G M Eliopoulos; Q Qian
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Increasing occurrence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the United States.

Authors:  J M Boyce; W A Causey
Journal:  Infect Control       Date:  1982 Sep-Oct

Review 6.  Methicillin resistance in staphylococci: molecular and biochemical basis and clinical implications.

Authors:  H F Chambers
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 26.132

7.  Evaluation of three techniques for detection of low-level methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): a disk diffusion method with cefoxitin and moxalactam, the Vitek 2 system, and the MRSA-screen latex agglutination test.

Authors:  Annie Felten; Bernadette Grandry; Philippe Henri Lagrange; Isabelle Casin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in rabbits: expression of resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics in vivo and in vitro.

Authors:  H F Chambers; C J Hackbarth; T A Drake; M G Rusnak; M A Sande
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 5.226

9.  Flucloxacillin, a new isoxazolyl penicillin, compared with oxacillin, cloxacillin, and dicloxacillin.

Authors:  R Sutherland; E A Croydon; G N Rolinson
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1970-11-21

10.  In vitro activity and beta-lactamase stability of a new penem, CGP 31608.

Authors:  H C Neu; N X Chin; N M Neu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  17 in total

1.  Does Preoperative Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Influence the Diagnostic Potential of Periprosthetic Tissues in Hip or Knee Infections?

Authors:  Klemen Bedenčič; Martina Kavčič; Nataša Faganeli; Rene Mihalič; Blaž Mavčič; Jožica Dolenc; Zlatka Bajc; Rihard Trebše
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Carriage in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected and Uninfected Children in Botswana: Prevalence and Risk Factors.

Authors:  Michael J A Reid; Rebecca S B Fischer; Naledi Mannathoko; Charles Muthoga; Erin McHugh; Heather Essigmann; Eric L Brown; Andrew P Steenhoff
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 2.345

3.  The NaHCO3-Responsive Phenotype in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Is Influenced by mecA Genotype.

Authors:  Selvi C Ersoy; Adhar C Manna; Arnold S Bayer; Ambrose Cheung; Richard A Proctor; Henry F Chambers; Ewan M Harrison
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 5.938

4.  Microbiological and Susceptibility Profile of Clinical Gram Positive Isolates at a Tertiary Pediatric and Maternity Hospital in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.

Authors:  Susanna Felsenstein; Sarantsetseg Bira; Narangerel Altanmircheg; Enkhtur Shonkhuuz; Ariuntuya Ochirpurev; David Warburton
Journal:  Cent Asian J Glob Health       Date:  2019-09-30

5.  Impact of prior healthcare-associated exposure on clinical and molecular characterization of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: results from a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Pao-Yu Chen; Yu-Chung Chuang; Jann-Tay Wang; Shan-Chwen Chang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Continued in vitro cefazolin susceptibility in methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Benjamin H Gern; Alexander L Greninger; Scott J Weissman; Jennifer R Stapp; Yue Tao; Xuan Qin
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 3.944

7.  Bicarbonate Resensitization of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus to β-Lactam Antibiotics.

Authors:  Selvi C Ersoy; Wessam Abdelhady; Liang Li; Henry F Chambers; Yan Q Xiong; Arnold S Bayer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Antimicrobial Resistance Spectrum Conferred by pRErm46 of Emerging Macrolide (Multidrug)-Resistant Rhodococcus equi.

Authors:  Erdal Erol; Mariela Scortti; Jordan Fortner; Mukesh Patel; José A Vázquez-Boland
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Assessing the Surrogate Susceptibility of Oxacillin and Cefoxitin for Commonly Utilized Parenteral Agents against Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus: Focus on Ceftriaxone Discordance between Predictive Susceptibility and in Vivo Exposures.

Authors:  Nayon Kang; Seth T Housman; David P Nicolau
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2015-07-30

10.  Scope and Predictive Genetic/Phenotypic Signatures of Bicarbonate (NaHCO3) Responsiveness and β-Lactam Sensitization in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Selvi C Ersoy; Mariam Otmishi; Vanessa T Milan; Liang Li; Youngju Pak; Jose Mediavilla; Liang Chen; Barry Kreiswirth; Henry F Chambers; Richard A Proctor; Yan Q Xiong; Vance G Fowler; Arnold S Bayer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.