Literature DB >> 23399654

How good is research really? Measuring the citation impact of publications with percentiles increases correct assessments and fair comparisons.

Lutz Bornmann1, Werner Marx.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2012        PMID： 23399654      PMCID： PMC3589094          DOI： 10.1038/embor.2013.9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO Rep        ISSN： 1469-221X            Impact factor:   8.807


× No keyword cloud information.
  11 in total

1.  Mapping knowledge domains: characterizing PNAS.

Authors:  Kevin W Boyack
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-02-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Diversity, value and limitations of the journal impact factor and alternative metrics.

Authors:  Lutz Bornmann; Werner Marx; Armen Yuri Gasparyan; George D Kitas
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 2.631

3.  How to improve the use of metrics.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Metrics: A profusion of measures.

Authors:  Richard Van Noorden
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Metrics: journal's impact factor skewed by a single paper.

Authors:  Jordan D Dimitrov; Srini V Kaveri; Jagadeesh Bayry
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output.

Authors:  J E Hirsch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The history and meaning of the journal impact factor.

Authors:  Eugene Garfield
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  The demise of the lone author.

Authors:  Mott Greene
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  The state of h index research. Is the h index the ideal way to measure research performance?

Authors:  Lutz Bornmann; Hans-Dieter Daniel
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 8.807

10.  A bibliometric analysis of NOAA's Office of Ocean Exploration and Research.

Authors:  Chris W Belter
Journal:  Scientometrics       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.238
View more
  11 in total

1.  Citation impact of NHLBI R01 grants funded through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act as compared to R01 grants funded through a standard payline.

Authors:  Narasimhan S Danthi; Colin O Wu; Donna M DiMichele; W Keith Hoots; Michael S Lauer
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 17.367

2.  A new bibliometric index based on the shape of the citation distribution.

Authors:  Tommaso Lando; Lucio Bertoli-Barsotti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Association of percentile ranking with citation impact and productivity in a large cohort of de novo NIMH-funded R01 grants.

Authors:  J M Doyle; K Quinn; Y A Bodenstein; C O Wu; N Danthi; M S Lauer
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 15.992

4.  Comments to the response of Rodríguez-Navarro.

Authors:  Lutz Bornmann; Werner Marx
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 8.807

5.  Response to 'How good is research really?'.

Authors:  Alonso Rodríguez-Navarro
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 8.807

6.  Predicting Productivity Returns on Investment: Thirty Years of Peer Review, Grant Funding, and Publication of Highly Cited Papers at the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

Authors:  Michael S Lauer; Narasimhan S Danthi; Jonathan Kaltman; Colin Wu
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 17.367

7.  Prior publication productivity, grant percentile ranking, and topic-normalized citation impact of NHLBI cardiovascular R01 grants.

Authors:  Jonathan R Kaltman; Frank J Evans; Narasimhan S Danthi; Colin O Wu; Donna M DiMichele; Michael S Lauer
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 8.  Initial Outcomes for the NHLBI K99/R00 Pathway to Independence Program in Relation to Long-Standing Career Development Programs: Implications for Trainees, Mentors, and Institutions.

Authors:  Drew E Carlson; Wayne C Wang; Jane D Scott
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 17.367

9.  Global nanotribology research output (1996-2010): a scientometric analysis.

Authors:  Bakthavachalam Elango; Periyaswamy Rajendran; Lutz Bornmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Publication Speed, Reporting Metrics, and Citation Impact of Cardiovascular Trials Supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

Authors:  David Gordon; Katharine Cooper-Arnold; Michael Lauer
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 5.501
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.