Literature DB >> 25542026

A new bibliometric index based on the shape of the citation distribution.

Tommaso Lando1, Lucio Bertoli-Barsotti2.   

Abstract

In order to improve the h-index in terms of its accuracy and sensitivity to the form of the citation distribution, we propose the new bibliometric index [symbol in text]. The basic idea is to define, for any author with a given number of citations, an "ideal" citation distribution which represents a benchmark in terms of number of papers and number of citations per publication, and to obtain an index which increases its value when the real citation distribution approaches its ideal form. The method is very general because the ideal distribution can be defined differently according to the main objective of the index. In this paper we propose to define it by a "squared-form" distribution: this is consistent with many popular bibliometric indices, which reach their maximum value when the distribution is basically a "square". This approach generally rewards the more regular and reliable researchers, and it seems to be especially suitable for dealing with common situations such as applications for academic positions. To show the advantages of the [symbol in text]-index some mathematical properties are proved and an application to real data is proposed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25542026      PMCID: PMC4277364          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115962

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  5 in total

1.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output.

Authors:  J E Hirsch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  How good is research really? Measuring the citation impact of publications with percentiles increases correct assessments and fair comparisons.

Authors:  Lutz Bornmann; Werner Marx
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2012-02-12       Impact factor: 8.807

3.  Bounds and inequalities relating h-index, g-index, e-index and generalized impact factor: an improvement over existing models.

Authors:  Ash Mohammad Abbas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The e-index, complementing the h-index for excess citations.

Authors:  Chun-Ting Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The h'-index, effectively improving the h-index based on the citation distribution.

Authors:  Chun-Ting Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total
  4 in total

1.  Expectations and satisfaction of academic investigators in nonclinical collaboration with the pharmaceutical industry.

Authors:  Marjan Amiri; Martin C Michel
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 3.000

2.  Bradford's law, the long tail principle, and transparency in Journal Impact Factor calculations.

Authors:  Fernando Fernandez-Llimos
Journal:  Pharm Pract (Granada)       Date:  2016-09-15

3.  Comprehensive Researcher Achievement Model (CRAM): a framework for measuring researcher achievement, impact and influence derived from a systematic literature review of metrics and models.

Authors:  Jeffrey Braithwaite; Jessica Herkes; Kate Churruca; Janet C Long; Chiara Pomare; Claire Boyling; Mia Bierbaum; Robyn Clay-Williams; Frances Rapport; Patti Shih; Anne Hogden; Louise A Ellis; Kristiana Ludlow; Elizabeth Austin; Rebecca Seah; Elise McPherson; Peter D Hibbert; Johanna Westbrook
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Evaluating Journal Impact Factor: a systematic survey of the pros and cons, and overview of alternative measures.

Authors:  Eugene Mech; Muhammad Muneeb Ahmed; Edward Tamale; Matthew Holek; Guowei Li; Lehana Thabane
Journal:  J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis       Date:  2020-08-31
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.