Literature DB >> 20559368

How to improve the use of metrics.

.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2010        PMID： 20559368     DOI： 10.1038/465870a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN： 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


× No keyword cloud information.
  1 in total

1.  A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation.

Authors:  E L Deci; R Koestner; R M Ryan
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 17.737
  1 in total
  5 in total

1.  Metrics: don't dismiss journals with a low impact factor.

Authors:  Jay M Fitzsimmons; Jeffrey H Skevington
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Metrics: journal's impact factor skewed by a single paper.

Authors:  Jordan D Dimitrov; Srini V Kaveri; Jagadeesh Bayry
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Metrics: include refereeing as part of performance rating.

Authors:  Pedro Cintas; Elena Paoletti
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  How good is research really? Measuring the citation impact of publications with percentiles increases correct assessments and fair comparisons.

Authors:  Lutz Bornmann; Werner Marx
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2012-02-12       Impact factor: 8.807

5.  The Scientific Impact of Developing Nations.

Authors:  Claudia N Gonzalez-Brambila; Leonardo Reyes-Gonzalez; Francisco Veloso; Miguel Angel Perez-Angón
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.