Literature DB >> 23398945

Errors in the estimation of wall shear stress by maximum Doppler velocity.

Jonathan P Mynard1, Bruce A Wasserman, David A Steinman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Wall shear stress (WSS) is an important parameter with links to vascular (dys)function. Difficult to measure directly, WSS is often inferred from maximum spectral Doppler velocity (Vmax) by assuming fully-developed flow, which is valid only if the vessel is long and straight. Motivated by evidence that even slight/local curvatures in the nominally straight common carotid artery (CCA) prevent flow from fully developing, we investigated the effects of velocity profile skewing on Vmax-derived WSS.
METHODS: Velocity profiles, representing different degrees of skewing, were extracted from the CCA of image-based computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations carried out as part of the VALIDATE study. Maximum velocities were calculated from idealised sample volumes and used to estimate WSS via fully-developed (Poiseuille or Womersley) velocity profiles, for comparison with the actual (i.e. CFD-derived) WSS.
RESULTS: For cycle-averaged WSS, mild velocity profile skewing caused ±25% errors by assuming Poiseuille or Womersley profiles, while severe skewing caused a median error of 30% (maximum 55%). Peak systolic WSS was underestimated by ~50% irrespective of skewing with Poiseuille; using a Womersley profile removed this bias, but ±30% errors remained. Errors were greatest in late systole, when skewing was most pronounced. Skewing also introduced large circumferential WSS variations: ±60%, and up to ±100%, of the circumferentially averaged value.
CONCLUSION: Vmax-derived WSS may be prone to substantial variable errors related to velocity profile skewing, and cannot detect possibly large circumferential WSS variations. Caution should be exercised when making assumptions about velocity profile shape to calculate WSS, even in vessels usually considered long and straight.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23398945      PMCID: PMC4329978          DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.01.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atherosclerosis        ISSN: 0021-9150            Impact factor:   5.162


  35 in total

1.  Association between wall shear stress and flow-mediated vasodilation in healthy men.

Authors:  A Gnasso; C Carallo; C Irace; M S De Franceschi; P L Mattioli; C Motti; C Cortese
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.162

2.  Low wall shear stress in carotid arteries in subjects with left ventricular hypertrophy.

Authors:  Y Jiang; K Kohara; K Hiwada
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.689

3.  Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis.

Authors:  A M Malek; S L Alper; S Izumo
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Accurate noninvasive quantitation of blood flow, cross-sectional lumen vessel area and wall shear stress by three-dimensional paraboloid modeling of magnetic resonance imaging velocity data.

Authors:  S Oyre; S Ringgaard; S Kozerke; W P Paaske; M Erlandsen; P Boesiger; E M Pedersen
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Association between intima-media thickness and wall shear stress in common carotid arteries in healthy male subjects.

Authors:  A Gnasso; C Carallo; C Irace; V Spagnuolo; G De Novara; P L Mattioli; A Pujia
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1996-12-15       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  A noninvasive method to estimate wall shear rate using ultrasound.

Authors:  P J Brands; A P Hoeks; L Hofstra; R S Reneman
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  In vivo association between low wall shear stress and plaque in subjects with asymmetrical carotid atherosclerosis.

Authors:  A Gnasso; C Irace; C Carallo; M S De Franceschi; C Motti; P L Mattioli; A Pujia
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Wall shear stress is associated with intima-media thickness and carotid atherosclerosis in subjects at low coronary heart disease risk.

Authors:  Concetta Irace; Claudio Cortese; Elio Fiaschi; Claudio Carallo; Eduardo Farinaro; Agostino Gnasso
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Pulsatile flow and oscillating wall shear stress in the brachial artery of normotensive and hypertensive subjects.

Authors:  A C Simon; J Levenson; P Flaud
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 10.787

10.  Shear stress depends on vascular territory: comparison between common carotid and brachial artery.

Authors:  Ruben Dammers; Frank Stifft; Jan H M Tordoir; Jeroen M M Hameleers; Arnold P G Hoeks; Peter J E H M Kitslaar
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2002-10-04
View more
  14 in total

1.  Endothelial shear stress estimation in the human carotid artery based on Womersley versus Poiseuille flow.

Authors:  Janina C V Schwarz; Raphaël Duivenvoorden; Aart J Nederveen; Erik S G Stroes; Ed VanBavel
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Computational Fluid Dynamics of Vascular Disease in Animal Models.

Authors:  Andrea Acuna; Alycia G Berman; Frederick W Damen; Brett A Meyers; Amelia R Adelsperger; Kelsey C Bayer; Melissa C Brindise; Brittani Bungart; Alexander M Kiel; Rachel A Morrison; Joseph C Muskat; Kelsey M Wasilczuk; Yi Wen; Jiacheng Zhang; Patrick Zito; Craig J Goergen
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Measurement of Wall Shear Stress Exerted by Flowing Blood in the Human Carotid Artery: Ultrasound Doppler Velocimetry and Echo Particle Image Velocimetry.

Authors:  Phillip E Gates; Arati Gurung; Luciano Mazzaro; Kuni Aizawa; Salim Elyas; William D Strain; Angela C Shore; Robin Shandas
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Cerebral aneurysms treated with flow-diverting stents: computational models with intravascular blood flow measurements.

Authors:  M R Levitt; P M McGah; A Aliseda; P D Mourad; J D Nerva; S S Vaidya; R P Morton; B V Ghodke; L J Kim
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  MR derived volumetric flow rate waveforms of internal carotid artery in patients treated for unruptured intracranial aneurysms by flow diversion technique.

Authors:  Omer F Eker; Karim Zouaoui Boudjeltia; Ricardo A Corredor Jerez; Emmanuelle Le Bars; Mathieu Sanchez; Alain Bonafé; Vincent Costalat; Guy Courbebaisse
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 6.200

6.  The role of wall shear stress in the parent artery as an independent variable in the formation status of anterior communicating artery aneurysms.

Authors:  Xin Zhang; Zhi-Qiang Yao; Tamrakar Karuna; Xu-Ying He; Xue-Min Wang; Xi-Feng Li; Wen-Chao Liu; Ran Li; Shen-Quan Guo; Yun-Chang Chen; Gan-Cheng Li; Chuan-Zhi Duan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Elevated uptake of plasma macromolecules by regions of arterial wall predisposed to plaque instability in a mouse model.

Authors:  Zahra Mohri; Ethan M Rowland; Lindsey A Clarke; Amalia De Luca; Véronique Peiffer; Rob Krams; Spencer J Sherwin; Peter D Weinberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Carotid artery wall shear stress is independently correlated with renal function in the elderly.

Authors:  Yuqi Guo; Fang Wei; Juan Wang; Yingxin Zhao; Shangwen Sun; Hua Zhang; Zhendong Liu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-01-02

9.  Hemodynamic numerical simulations of the disturbance due to intracoronary flow measurements by a Doppler guide wire.

Authors:  Kamil J Chodzyński; Simone Gremmo; Omer F Eker; Jacques Lalmand; Adel Aminian; Daniel Ribeiro de Sousa; Karim Zouaoui Boudjeltia; Grégory Coussement
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 2.819

10.  Ultrasound Based Computational Fluid Dynamics Assessment of Brachial Artery Wall Shear Stress in Preeclamptic Pregnancy.

Authors:  Ryan J Pewowaruk; Jenna Racine; J Igor Iruretagoyena; Alejandro Roldán-Alzate
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 2.305

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.