Literature DB >> 29570754

Computational Fluid Dynamics of Vascular Disease in Animal Models.

Andrea Acuna1, Alycia G Berman1, Frederick W Damen1, Brett A Meyers2, Amelia R Adelsperger1, Kelsey C Bayer1, Melissa C Brindise2, Brittani Bungart1, Alexander M Kiel1, Rachel A Morrison1, Joseph C Muskat1, Kelsey M Wasilczuk1, Yi Wen3, Jiacheng Zhang2, Patrick Zito1, Craig J Goergen4.   

Abstract

Recent applications of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) applied to the cardiovascular system have demonstrated its power in investigating the impact of hemodynamics on disease initiation, progression, and treatment outcomes. Flow metrics such as pressure distributions, wall shear stresses (WSS), and blood velocity profiles can be quantified to provide insight into observed pathologies, assist with surgical planning, or even predict disease progression. While numerous studies have performed simulations on clinical human patient data, it often lacks prediagnosis information and can be subject to large intersubject variability, limiting the generalizability of findings. Thus, animal models are often used to identify and manipulate specific factors contributing to vascular disease because they provide a more controlled environment. In this review, we explore the use of CFD in animal models in recent studies to investigate the initiating mechanisms, progression, and intervention effects of various vascular diseases. The first section provides a brief overview of the CFD theory and tools that are commonly used to study blood flow. The following sections are separated by anatomical region, with the abdominal, thoracic, and cerebral areas specifically highlighted. We discuss the associated benefits and obstacles to performing CFD modeling in each location. Finally, we highlight animal CFD studies focusing on common surgical treatments, including arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) and pulmonary artery grafts. The studies included in this review demonstrate the value of combining CFD with animal imaging and should encourage further research to optimize and expand upon these techniques for the study of vascular disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29570754      PMCID: PMC6993788          DOI: 10.1115/1.4039678

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  118 in total

1.  Effect of Reynolds number and flow division on patterns of haemodynamic wall shear stress near branch points in the descending thoracic aorta.

Authors:  A Kazakidi; S J Sherwin; P D Weinberg
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Wall shear stress exposure time: a Lagrangian measure of near-wall stagnation and concentration in cardiovascular flows.

Authors:  Amirhossein Arzani; Alberto M Gambaruto; Guoning Chen; Shawn C Shadden
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2016-11-17

3.  Computer modeling of deployment and mechanical expansion of neurovascular flow diverter in patient-specific intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Ding Ma; Gary F Dargush; Sabareesh K Natarajan; Elad I Levy; Adnan H Siddiqui; Hui Meng
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Differences in aortic arch geometry, hemodynamics, and plaque patterns between C57BL/6 and 129/SvEv mice.

Authors:  Hui Zhu; Ji Zhang; Jessica Shih; Federico Lopez-Bertoni; John R Hagaman; Nobuyo Maeda; Morton H Friedman
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 5.  Challenges in small animal noninvasive imaging.

Authors:  R S Balaban; V A Hampshire
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2001

6.  Comparative aspects of coronary collateral circulation.

Authors:  W Schaper; W Flameng; M De Brabander
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 2.622

7.  Hemodynamics of the mouse abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Matthew D Ford; Ariel T Black; Richard Y Cao; Colin D Funk; Ugo Piomelli
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.097

8.  Hemodynamic changes by flow diverters in rabbit aneurysm models: a computational fluid dynamic study based on micro-computed tomography reconstruction.

Authors:  Qinghai Huang; Jinyu Xu; Jiyong Cheng; Shengzhang Wang; Kuizhong Wang; Jian-Min Liu
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Haemodynamical stress in mouse aortic arch with atherosclerotic plaques: Preliminary study of plaque progression.

Authors:  P Assemat; K K Siu; J A Armitage; S N Hokke; A Dart; J Chin-Dusting; K Hourigan
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 7.271

Review 10.  Heart blood flow simulation: a perspective review.

Authors:  Siamak N Doost; Dhanjoo Ghista; Boyang Su; Liang Zhong; Yosry S Morsi
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 2.819

View more
  5 in total

1.  Patient-specific changes in aortic hemodynamics is associated with thrombotic risk after fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair with large diameter endografts.

Authors:  Kenneth Tran; K Brennan Feliciano; Weiguang Yang; Erica L Schwarz; Alison L Marsden; Ronald L Dalman; Jason T Lee
Journal:  JVS Vasc Sci       Date:  2022-04-21

2.  Experimental and Mouse-Specific Computational Models of the Fbln4SMKO Mouse to Identify Potential Biomarkers for Ascending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm.

Authors:  Marisa S Bazzi; Ramin Balouchzadeh; Shawn N Pavey; James D Quirk; Hiromi Yanagisawa; Vijay Vedula; Jessica E Wagenseil; Victor H Barocas
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 2.305

Review 3.  Recent Advances in Biomechanical Characterization of Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms.

Authors:  Hannah L Cebull; Vitaliy L Rayz; Craig J Goergen
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2020-05-12

4.  Analysis of Predictive Model of Coronary Vulnerable Plaque under Hemodynamic Numerical Simulation.

Authors:  Qiang Song; Mingwei Chen; Jin Shang; Zhi Hu; Hui Cai
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 2.682

5.  Preclinical techniques to investigate exercise training in vascular pathophysiology.

Authors:  Gurneet S Sangha; Craig J Goergen; Steven J Prior; Sushant M Ranadive; Alisa M Clyne
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 5.125

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.