Literature DB >> 7571127

A noninvasive method to estimate wall shear rate using ultrasound.

P J Brands1, A P Hoeks, L Hofstra, R S Reneman.   

Abstract

Wall shear stress (blood viscosity x wall shear rate), imposed by the flowing blood, and blood pressure are the main mechanical forces acting on a blood vessel wall. Accurate measurement of wall shear stress is important when investigating the development of vascular disease, since both high and low wall shear stresses have been cited as factors leading to vessel wall anomalies. Furthermore, in vitro studies have shown that endothelial cells, which play a key role in the function of the underlying arterial wall, undergo a variety of structural and functional changes in response to imposed shear stress. However, there is practically no knowledge about the influence of wall shear stress on the arterial wall in vivo because of the difficulty in measuring this stress in terms of magnitude and time variation. The method presented in this article to measure the time-dependent wall shear rate in the main arteries is based on the evaluation of velocity profiles determined by means of ultrasound, using off-line signal processing. Pulsed ultrasound is well suited for this application since it is noninvasive. The processing performed in the radio-frequency (RF) domain consists of a mean frequency estimator preceded by an adaptive vessel wall filter. In a pilot study (30 measurements in the carotid artery of five healthy volunteers) we investigated the reproducibility of our method to estimate wall shear rate as compared with the reproducibility of the measurement of blood flow velocity in the middle of the vessel. The coefficient of variation was on the order of 9% for blood flow velocity estimation, and for wall shear rate estimation on the order of 5%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7571127     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-5629(94)00111-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  19 in total

1.  Application of full field optical studies for pulsatile flow in a carotid artery phantom.

Authors:  M Nemati; G B Loozen; N van der Wekken; G van de Belt; H P Urbach; N Bhattacharya; S Kenjeres
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Model-based assessment of dynamic arterial blood volume flow from ultrasound measurements.

Authors:  C A D Leguy; E M H Bosboom; A P G Hoeks; F N van de Vosse
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 3.  Developments in cardiovascular ultrasound. Part 2: Arterial applications.

Authors:  P R Hoskins; P J Fish; W N McDicken; C Moran
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 4.  Developments in cardiovascular ultrasound: Part 1: Signal processing and instrumentation.

Authors:  P J Fish; P R Hoskins; C Moran; W N McDicken
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Ultrasonic colour Doppler imaging.

Authors:  David H Evans; Jørgen Arendt Jensen; Michael Bachmann Nielsen
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 3.906

6.  Spatial distribution of wall shear stress in common carotid artery by color Doppler flow imaging.

Authors:  Chao Wang; Ming Chen; Sheng-lin Liu; Yi Liu; Jia-mei Jin; Yu-hui Zhang
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Quantification and comparison of 4D-flow MRI-derived wall shear stress and MRE-derived wall stiffness of the abdominal aorta.

Authors:  Arunark Kolipaka; Venkata Sita Priyanka Illapani; Prateek Kalra; Julio Garcia; Xiaokui Mo; Michael Markl; Richard D White
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Arterial and renal consequences of partial genetic deficiency in tissue kallikrein activity in humans.

Authors:  Michel Azizi; Pierre Boutouyrie; Alvine Bissery; Mohsen Agharazii; Francis Verbeke; Nora Stern; Alessandra Bura-Rivière; Stéphane Laurent; François Alhenc-Gelas; Xavier Jeunemaitre
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 14.808

9.  In vivo vascular wall shear rate and circumferential strain of renal disease patients.

Authors:  Dae Woo Park; Grant H Kruger; Jonathan M Rubin; James Hamilton; Paul Gottschalk; Robert E Dodde; Albert J Shih; William F Weitzel
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Errors in the estimation of wall shear stress by maximum Doppler velocity.

Authors:  Jonathan P Mynard; Bruce A Wasserman; David A Steinman
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 5.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.