Literature DB >> 23398253

Elastic facial movement influences part-based but not holistic processing.

Naiqi G Xiao1, Paul C Quinn, Liezhong Ge, Kang Lee.   

Abstract

Face processing has been studied for decades. However, most of the empirical investigations have been conducted using static face images as stimuli. Little is known about whether static face processing findings can be generalized to real-world contexts in which faces are constantly moving. The present study investigated the nature of face processing (holistic vs. part-based) in elastic moving faces. Specifically, we focused on whether elastic moving faces, as compared with static ones, can facilitate holistic or part-based face processing. Using the composite paradigm, we asked participants to remember either an elastic moving face (i.e., a face that blinks and chews) or a static face, and then tested with a static composite face. The composite effect was (a) significantly smaller in the dynamic condition than in the static condition, (b) consistently found with different face encoding times (Experiments 1-3), and (c) present for the recognition of both upper and lower face parts (Experiment 4). These results suggest that elastic facial motion facilitates part-based processing rather than holistic processing. Thus, whereas previous work with static faces has emphasized an important role for holistic processing, the current work highlights an important role for featural processing with moving faces. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23398253      PMCID: PMC3889867          DOI: 10.1037/a0031631

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  38 in total

1.  The use of facial motion and facial form during the processing of identity.

Authors:  Barbara Knappmeyer; Ian M Thornton; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Repetition priming from moving faces.

Authors:  Karen Lander; Vicki Bruce
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-06

3.  The effect of motion at encoding and retrieval for same- and other-race face recognition.

Authors:  Natalie Butcher; Karen Lander; Hui Fang; Nick Costen
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2011-11

4.  Recognizing face identity from natural and morphed smiles.

Authors:  Karen Lander; Lewis Chuang; Lee Wickham
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.143

5.  Exploring the role of characteristic motion when learning new faces.

Authors:  Karen Lander; Rebecca Davies
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.143

6.  The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: direct evidence.

Authors:  A Freire; K Lee; L A Symons
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Perceptual Expertise as a Shift from Strategic Interference to Automatic Holistic Processing.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; Yetta K Wong; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-04-15

8.  Recognizing people from dynamic and static faces and bodies: dissecting identity with a fusion approach.

Authors:  Alice J O'Toole; P Jonathon Phillips; Samuel Weimer; Dana A Roark; Julianne Ayyad; Robert Barwick; Joseph Dunlop
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Does temporal integration of face parts reflect holistic processing?

Authors:  Olivia S Cheung; Jennifer J Richler; W Stewart Phillips; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-06

10.  What Is Special about Face Recognition? Nineteen Experiments on a Person with Visual Object Agnosia and Dyslexia but Normal Face Recognition.

Authors:  M Moscovitch; G Winocur; M Behrmann
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  4 in total

1.  The constancy of the holistic processing of unfamiliar faces: Evidence from the study-test consistency effect and the within-person motion and viewpoint invariance.

Authors:  Yu Zhou; Xinge Liu; Xinran Feng; Guomei Zhou
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Eye tracking reveals a crucial role for facial motion in recognition of faces by infants.

Authors:  Naiqi G Xiao; Paul C Quinn; Shaoying Liu; Liezhong Ge; Olivier Pascalis; Kang Lee
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2015-06

3.  Face Perception and Test Reliabilities in Congenital Prosopagnosia in Seven Tests.

Authors:  Janina Esins; Johannes Schultz; Claudia Stemper; Ingo Kennerknecht; Isabelle Bülthoff
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2016-01-20

Review 4.  On the facilitative effects of face motion on face recognition and its development.

Authors:  Naiqi G Xiao; Steve Perrotta; Paul C Quinn; Zhe Wang; Yu-Hao P Sun; Kang Lee
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-06-24
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.