Literature DB >> 17455062

Exploring the role of characteristic motion when learning new faces.

Karen Lander1, Rebecca Davies.   

Abstract

Previous research has shown that it is easier to recognize familiar faces when shown moving, rather than static, especially when viewing conditions are difficult (Knight & Johnston, 1997; Lander, Christie, & Bruce, 1999). One possible theoretical reason for the moving-face advantage is that we learn "characteristic motion signatures" for familiar faces, associated with the face representation in memory. To examine this idea we investigated the role of motion at test when learning faces from either static images or moving sequences (Experiment 1). Results suggest that there is only an advantage for motion at test when the face is learned moving. In Experiment 2 we map the importance of facial motion as a face becomes increasingly familiar, on a television drama. We demonstrate that the beneficial effect of motion is not dependent on the amount of time the face is viewed. Results from both experiments support the idea of rapidly learned characteristic motion patterns.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17455062     DOI: 10.1080/17470210601117559

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  16 in total

1.  Rigid facial motion influences featural, but not holistic, face processing.

Authors:  Naiqi G Xiao; Paul C Quinn; Liezhong Ge; Kang Lee
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Spatiotemporal information during unsupervised learning enhances viewpoint invariant object recognition.

Authors:  Moqian Tian; Kalanit Grill-Spector
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Eye tracking reveals a crucial role for facial motion in recognition of faces by infants.

Authors:  Naiqi G Xiao; Paul C Quinn; Shaoying Liu; Liezhong Ge; Olivier Pascalis; Kang Lee
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2015-06

4.  Simulation of talking faces in the human brain improves auditory speech recognition.

Authors:  Katharina von Kriegstein; Ozgür Dogan; Martina Grüter; Anne-Lise Giraud; Christian A Kell; Thomas Grüter; Andreas Kleinschmidt; Stefan J Kiebel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Elastic facial movement influences part-based but not holistic processing.

Authors:  Naiqi G Xiao; Paul C Quinn; Liezhong Ge; Kang Lee
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Dynamic and static facial expressions decoded from motion-sensitive areas in the macaque monkey.

Authors:  Nicholas Furl; Fadila Hadj-Bouziane; Ning Liu; Bruno B Averbeck; Leslie G Ungerleider
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Stimulus repetition and the perception of time: the effects of prior exposure on temporal discrimination, judgment, and production.

Authors:  William J Matthews
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  The neuroscience of face processing and identification in eyewitnesses and offenders.

Authors:  Nicole-Simone Werner; Sina Kühnel; Hans J Markowitsch
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 3.558

Review 9.  On the facilitative effects of face motion on face recognition and its development.

Authors:  Naiqi G Xiao; Steve Perrotta; Paul C Quinn; Zhe Wang; Yu-Hao P Sun; Kang Lee
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-06-24

10.  Forgetting faces over a week: investigating self-reported face recognition ability and personality.

Authors:  Robin S S Kramer
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.