Literature DB >> 16608747

Recognizing face identity from natural and morphed smiles.

Karen Lander1, Lewis Chuang, Lee Wickham.   

Abstract

It is easier to identify a degraded familiar face when it is shown moving (smiling, talking; nonrigid motion), than when it is displayed as a static image (Knight & Johnston, 1997; Lander, Christie, & Bruce, 1999). Here we explore the theoretical underpinnings of the moving face recognition advantage. In Experiment 1 we show that the identification of personally familiar faces when shown naturally smiling is significantly better than when the person is shown artificially smiling (morphed motion), as a single static neutral image or as a single static smiling image. In Experiment 2 we demonstrate that speeding up the motion significantly impairs the recognition of identity from natural smiles, but has little effect on morphed smiles. We conclude that the recognition advantage for face motion does not reflect a general benefit for motion, but suggests that, for familiar faces, information about their characteristic motion is stored in memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16608747     DOI: 10.1080/17470210600576136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  6 in total

1.  On the interplay between familiarity and emotional expression in face perception.

Authors:  Christian Dobel; Lena Geiger; Maximilian Bruchmann; Christian Putsche; Stefan R Schweinberger; Markus Junghöfer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2007-12-08

2.  Elastic facial movement influences part-based but not holistic processing.

Authors:  Naiqi G Xiao; Paul C Quinn; Liezhong Ge; Kang Lee
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  What the human brain likes about facial motion.

Authors:  Johannes Schultz; Matthias Brockhaus; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Karin S Pilz
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Perception of temporal asymmetries in dynamic facial expressions.

Authors:  Maren Reinl; Andreas Bartels
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-04

Review 5.  On the facilitative effects of face motion on face recognition and its development.

Authors:  Naiqi G Xiao; Steve Perrotta; Paul C Quinn; Zhe Wang; Yu-Hao P Sun; Kang Lee
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-06-24

6.  Identity information content depends on the type of facial movement.

Authors:  Katharina Dobs; Isabelle Bülthoff; Johannes Schultz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.