Literature DB >> 23396273

Temporal interaction in electrical hearing elucidates auditory nerve dynamics in humans.

S A Karg1, C Lackner, W Hemmert.   

Abstract

In cochlear implants, severe limitations arise from electrical crosstalk between channels. Therefore, the current trend in cochlear implants is to increase stimulation rates to encode signals with higher temporal precision. However, the fundamental question: "What is the limit of temporal precision due to inherent neuronal dynamics of the stimulated neurons?" has not yet been resolved. In this study we have developed a double-pulse method and, for the first time, reversed stimulus polarity systematically between consecutive pulses to elucidate subthreshold-induced temporal interaction effects. This method allowed us to determine the time-course of subthreshold temporal interaction in human subjects which identifies the limits of encoded temporal precision. Our results show significant temporal interaction up to 600 μs inter-pulse interval. In all the cases tested we saw a facilitation effect on threshold. Interaction effects at a 20% below threshold pre-conditioning stimulation showed up to 38% ± 6% threshold reduction. These results imply that there is significant temporal interaction between two subsequent pulses. This interaction diminishes the precision of amplitude coding. We predict interaction effects on temporal precision and channel interaction. For (interleaved) stimulation with short inter-pulse intervals it is interesting to consider our interaction results; and it may become important to consider them for future coding strategies where high temporal precision is required. In an increasing group of binaural implanted patients this will be the case when interaural time differences are encoded with μs precision.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23396273     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.01.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  9 in total

1.  The effect of polarity order and electrode-activation order on loudness in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Ann E Todd; David M Landsberger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effect of Pulse Polarity on Thresholds and on Non-monotonic Loudness Growth in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Olivier Macherey; Robert P Carlyon; Jacques Chatron; Stéphane Roman
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-01-30

3.  Superior temporal resolution of Chronos versus channelrhodopsin-2 in an optogenetic model of the auditory brainstem implant.

Authors:  Ariel Edward Hight; Elliott D Kozin; Keith Darrow; Ashton Lehmann; Edward Boyden; M Christian Brown; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Computational Modeling of Synchrony in the Auditory Nerve in Response to Acoustic and Electric Stimulation.

Authors:  Raymond L Goldsworthy
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.387

5.  Characteristics of the Adaptation Recovery Function of the Auditory Nerve and Its Association With Advanced Age in Postlingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Shuman He; Jeffrey Skidmore; Brittney L Carter
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 3.562

6.  Using Interleaved Stimulation to Measure the Size and Selectivity of the Sustained Phase-Locked Neural Response to Cochlear Implant Stimulation.

Authors:  Robert P Carlyon; François Guérit; John M Deeks; Andrew Harland; Robin Gransier; Jan Wouters; Simone R de Rijk; Manohar Bance
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-01-25

7.  Effect of the Relative Timing between Same-Polarity Pulses on Thresholds and Loudness in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  François Guérit; Jeremy Marozeau; Bastian Epp; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-08-24

8.  Intra-Cochlear Current Spread Correlates with Speech Perception in Experienced Adult Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Charles-Alexandre Joly; Pierre Reynard; Ruben Hermann; Fabien Seldran; Stéphane Gallego; Samar Idriss; Hung Thai-Van
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Polarity Sensitivity of Human Auditory Nerve Fibers Based on Pulse Shape, Cochlear Implant Stimulation Strategy and Array.

Authors:  Amirreza Heshmat; Sogand Sajedi; Anneliese Schrott-Fischer; Frank Rattay
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 4.677

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.