Literature DB >> 25598479

Superior temporal resolution of Chronos versus channelrhodopsin-2 in an optogenetic model of the auditory brainstem implant.

Ariel Edward Hight1, Elliott D Kozin2, Keith Darrow3, Ashton Lehmann2, Edward Boyden4, M Christian Brown2, Daniel J Lee5.   

Abstract

Contemporary auditory brainstem implant (ABI) performance is limited by reliance on electrical neurostimulation with its accompanying channel cross talk and current spread to non-auditory neurons. A new generation ABI based on optogenetic technology may ameliorate limitations fundamental to electrical stimulation. The most widely studied opsin is channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2); however, its relatively slow kinetic properties may prevent the encoding of auditory information at high stimulation rates. In the present study, we compare the temporal resolution of light-evoked responses of ChR2 to a recently developed fast opsin, Chronos, to ChR2 in a murine ABI model. Viral mediated gene transfer via a posterolateral craniotomy was used to express Chronos or ChR2 in the cochlear nucleus (CN). Following a four to eight week incubation period, blue light (473 nm) was delivered via an optical fiber placed directly on the surface of the infected CN, and neural activity was recorded in the contralateral inferior colliculus (IC). Both ChR2 and Chronos evoked sustained responses to all stimuli, even at high pulse rates. In addition, optical stimulation evoked excitatory responses throughout the tonotopic axis of the IC. Synchrony of the light-evoked response to stimulus rates of 14-448 pulses/s was higher in Chronos compared to ChR2 mice (p < 0.05 at 56, 168, and 224 pulses/s). Our results demonstrate that Chronos has the ability to drive the auditory system at higher stimulation rates than ChR2 and may be a more ideal opsin for manipulation of auditory pathways in future optogenetic-based neuroprostheses. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled "Lasker Award".
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25598479      PMCID: PMC4465525          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  40 in total

1.  Phase-locking of auditory-nerve discharges to sinusoidal electric stimulation of the cochlea.

Authors:  S B Dynes; B Delgutte
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Millisecond-timescale, genetically targeted optical control of neural activity.

Authors:  Edward S Boyden; Feng Zhang; Ernst Bamberg; Georg Nagel; Karl Deisseroth
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-08-14       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 3.  Neurofibromatosis type 2.

Authors:  Ashok R Asthagiri; Dilys M Parry; John A Butman; H Jeffrey Kim; Ekaterini T Tsilou; Zhengping Zhuang; Russell R Lonser
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: acoustic and electric hearing.

Authors:  Q J Fu; R V Shannon; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Auditory responses to electric and infrared neural stimulation of the rat cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  Rohit U Verma; Amélie A Guex; Kenneth E Hancock; Nedim Durakovic; Colette M McKay; Michaël C C Slama; M Christian Brown; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Complications in auditory brainstem implant surgery in adults and children.

Authors:  Vittorio Colletti; Robert V Shannon; Marco Carner; Sheila Veronese; Liliana Colletti
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Cochlear nucleus implants.

Authors:  W E Hitselberger; W F House; B J Edgerton; S Whitaker
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 3.497

8.  Open set speech perception with auditory brainstem implant?

Authors:  Vittorio Colletti; Robert V Shannon
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Selective electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve activates a pathway specialized for high temporal acuity.

Authors:  John C Middlebrooks; Russell L Snyder
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Assessment of the AAV-mediated expression of channelrhodopsin-2 and halorhodopsin in brainstem neurons mediating auditory signaling.

Authors:  T Shimano; B Fyk-Kolodziej; N Mirza; M Asako; K Tomoda; S Bledsoe; Z H Pan; S Molitor; A G Holt
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  19 in total

1.  Optimized Chronos sets the clock for optogenetic hearing restoration.

Authors:  Emiliano Ronzitti; Valeria Zampini; Valentina Emiliani
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 2.  Toward the Optical Cochlear Implant.

Authors:  Tobias Dombrowski; Vladan Rankovic; Tobias Moser
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 6.915

3.  Ultrafast optogenetic stimulation of the auditory pathway by targeting-optimized Chronos.

Authors:  Daniel Keppeler; Ricardo Martins Merino; David Lopez de la Morena; Burak Bali; Antoine Tarquin Huet; Anna Gehrt; Christian Wrobel; Swati Subramanian; Tobias Dombrowski; Fred Wolf; Vladan Rankovic; Andreas Neef; Tobias Moser
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  Theoretical analysis of low-power fast optogenetic control of firing of Chronos-expressing neurons.

Authors:  Sant Saran; Neha Gupta; Sukhdev Roy
Journal:  Neurophotonics       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.593

5.  Cochlear implants and other inner ear prostheses: today and tomorrow.

Authors:  Lina Aj Reiss
Journal:  Curr Opin Physiol       Date:  2020-08-14

6.  Superoptimal Perceptual Integration Suggests a Place-Based Representation of Pitch at High Frequencies.

Authors:  Bonnie K Lau; Anahita H Mehta; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Increasing the expression level of ChR2 enhances the optogenetic excitability of cochlear neurons.

Authors:  Xiankai Meng; Swetha Murali; Yen-Fu Cheng; Jingrong Lu; Ariel E Hight; Vivek V Kanumuri; M Christian Brown; Jeffrey R Holt; Daniel J Lee; Albert S B Edge
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 8.  How We Hear: The Perception and Neural Coding of Sound.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 24.137

9.  Frequency-Specific Optogenetic Deep Brain Stimulation of Subthalamic Nucleus Improves Parkinsonian Motor Behaviors.

Authors:  Chunxiu Yu; Isaac R Cassar; Jaydeep Sambangi; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Optogenetics for neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Kiara T Vann; Zhi-Gang Xiong
Journal:  Int J Physiol Pathophysiol Pharmacol       Date:  2016-04-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.