H S Nguyen1, N Milbach2, S L Hurrell2, E Cochran3, J Connelly4, J A Bovi5, C J Schultz5, W M Mueller1, S D Rand2, K M Schmainda2,6, P S LaViolette7,6. 1. From the Departments of Neurosurgery (H.S.N., W.M.M.). 2. Radiology (N.M., S.L.H., S.D.R., K.M.S., P.S.L.). 3. Pathology (E.C.). 4. Neurology (J.C.). 5. Radiation Oncology (J.A.B., C.J.S.). 6. Biophysics (K.M.S., P.S.L.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. 7. Radiology (N.M., S.L.H., S.D.R., K.M.S., P.S.L.) plaviole@mcw.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patients with recurrent glioblastoma often exhibit regions of diffusion restriction following the initiation of bevacizumab therapy. Studies suggest that these regions represent either diffusion-restricted necrosis or hypercellular tumor. This study explored postmortem brain specimens and a population analysis of overall survival to determine the identity and implications of such lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Postmortem examinations were performed on 6 patients with recurrent glioblastoma on bevacizumab with progressively growing regions of diffusion restriction. ADC values were extracted from regions of both hypercellular tumor and necrosis. A receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to define optimal ADC thresholds for differentiating tissue types. A retrospective population study was also performed comparing the overall survival of 64 patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab. Patients were separated into 3 groups: no diffusion restriction, diffusion restriction that appeared and progressed within 5 months of bevacizumab initiation, and delayed or stable diffusion restriction. An additional analysis was performed assessing tumor O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase methylation. RESULTS: The optimal ADC threshold for differentiation of hypercellularity and necrosis was 0.736 × 10-3mm2/s. Progressively expanding diffusion restriction was pathologically confirmed to be coagulative necrosis surrounded by viable tumor. Progressive lesions were associated with the worst overall survival, while stable lesions showed the greatest overall survival (P < .05). Of the 40% of patients with O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase methylated tumors, none developed diffusion-restricted lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Progressive diffusion-restricted lesions were pathologically confirmed to be coagulative necrosis surrounded by viable tumor and associated with decreased overall survival. Stable lesions were, however, associated with increased overall survival. All lesions were associated with O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase unmethylated tumors.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Patients with recurrent glioblastoma often exhibit regions of diffusion restriction following the initiation of bevacizumab therapy. Studies suggest that these regions represent either diffusion-restricted necrosis or hypercellular tumor. This study explored postmortem brain specimens and a population analysis of overall survival to determine the identity and implications of such lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Postmortem examinations were performed on 6 patients with recurrent glioblastoma on bevacizumab with progressively growing regions of diffusion restriction. ADC values were extracted from regions of both hypercellular tumor and necrosis. A receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to define optimal ADC thresholds for differentiating tissue types. A retrospective population study was also performed comparing the overall survival of 64 patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab. Patients were separated into 3 groups: no diffusion restriction, diffusion restriction that appeared and progressed within 5 months of bevacizumab initiation, and delayed or stable diffusion restriction. An additional analysis was performed assessing tumorO6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase methylation. RESULTS: The optimal ADC threshold for differentiation of hypercellularity and necrosis was 0.736 × 10-3mm2/s. Progressively expanding diffusion restriction was pathologically confirmed to be coagulative necrosis surrounded by viable tumor. Progressive lesions were associated with the worst overall survival, while stable lesions showed the greatest overall survival (P < .05). Of the 40% of patients with O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase methylated tumors, none developed diffusion-restricted lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Progressive diffusion-restricted lesions were pathologically confirmed to be coagulative necrosis surrounded by viable tumor and associated with decreased overall survival. Stable lesions were, however, associated with increased overall survival. All lesions were associated with O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase unmethylated tumors.
Authors: T Sugahara; Y Korogi; M Kochi; I Ikushima; Y Shigematu; T Hirai; T Okuda; L Liang; Y Ge; Y Komohara; Y Ushio; M Takahashi Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 1999-01 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Whitney B Pope; Hyun J Kim; Jing Huo; Jeffry Alger; Matthew S Brown; David Gjertson; Victor Sai; Jonathan R Young; Leena Tekchandani; Timothy Cloughesy; Paul S Mischel; Albert Lai; Phioanh Nghiemphu; Syed Rahmanuddin; Jonathan Goldin Journal: Radiology Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Nikdokht Farid; Daniela B Almeida-Freitas; Nathan S White; Carrie R McDonald; Joshua M Kuperman; Abdulrahman A Almutairi; Karra A Muller; Scott R VandenBerg; Santosh Kesari; Anders M Dale Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2014-08-19 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Rahul N Sawlani; Jeffrey Raizer; Sandra W Horowitz; Wanyong Shin; Sean A Grimm; James P Chandler; Robert Levy; Christopher Getch; Timothy J Carroll Journal: Radiology Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Kathleen M Schmainda; Melissa Prah; Jennifer Connelly; Scott D Rand; Raymond G Hoffman; Wade Mueller; Mark G Malkin Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2014-01-15 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Mark R Gilbert; James J Dignam; Terri S Armstrong; Jeffrey S Wefel; Deborah T Blumenthal; Michael A Vogelbaum; Howard Colman; Arnab Chakravarti; Stephanie Pugh; Minhee Won; Robert Jeraj; Paul D Brown; Kurt A Jaeckle; David Schiff; Volker W Stieber; David G Brachman; Maria Werner-Wasik; Ivo W Tremont-Lukats; Erik P Sulman; Kenneth D Aldape; Walter J Curran; Minesh P Mehta Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-02-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Daniel A Hamstra; Craig J Galbán; Charles R Meyer; Timothy D Johnson; Pia C Sundgren; Christina Tsien; Theodore S Lawrence; Larry Junck; David J Ross; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Brian D Ross; Thomas L Chenevert Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-06-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Benjamin M Ellingson; Eunhee Kim; Davis C Woodworth; Helga Marques; Jerrold L Boxerman; Yair Safriel; Robert C McKinstry; Felix Bokstein; Rajan Jain; T Linda Chi; A Gregory Sorensen; Mark R Gilbert; Daniel P Barboriak Journal: Int J Oncol Date: 2015-02-11 Impact factor: 5.650
Authors: Nikdokht Farid; Daniela B Almeida-Freitas; Nathan S White; Carrie R McDonald; Karra A Muller; Scott R Vandenberg; Santosh Kesari; Anders M Dale Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2013-09-30 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Carrie M Carr; John C Benson; David R DeLone; Felix E Diehn; Dong Kun Kim; Kenneth W Merrell; Alex A Nagelschneider; Ajay A Madhavan; Derek R Johnson Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2021-01-04 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: N Zakhari; M S Taccone; C Torres; S Chakraborty; J Sinclair; J Woulfe; G H Jansen; T B Nguyen Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2017-12-07 Impact factor: 3.825