PURPOSE: The incidence of estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer is higher among white women relative to black women. In two large prospective cohorts, the Black Women's Health Study (BWHS) and the Nurses' Health Study II (NHSII), we investigated whether reproductive factors explain the difference. METHODS: During 1,582,083 person-years of follow-up of 140,914 women observed from 1995 to 2007, 327 ER+ breast cancers were identified among black women in BWHS and NHSII and 1,179 among white women in NHSII. Cox proportional hazards regression models, stratified by race and pooled, were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for the association of race, parity, age at first birth, and lactation in relation to risk of ER+ cancer with adjustment for age and other breast cancer risk factors. RESULTS: Age at first birth differed markedly in the two groups, with 66 % of parous black women having their first child before age 25 as compared with 36 % of white women. Each additional year of age at first birth was associated with a 4 % increased risk of ER+ breast cancer among both racial groups. Relative to nulliparous women, parous women were at decreased risk of ER+ breast cancer (HR 0.59, 95 % CI 0.20, 1.77), in black women and (HR 0.63, 95 % CI 0.45, 0.87) in white women. The HR for the association of black race with ER+ cancer was 0.67 (95 % CI 0.53, 0.84) in a model that adjusted for age only, 0.77 (95 % CI 0.61, 0.99) in a model that controlled for parity, age at first birth, and other reproductive/hormonal factors, and 0.83 (95 % CI 0.70, 0.98) in a model that additionally controlled for other breast cancer risk factors such as alcohol consumption and use of hormone supplements. Similar associations were seen among premenopausal women and in an analysis restricted to ER+PR+ tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Reproductive factors explained some of the higher incidence of ER+ tumors among white women as compared to black women.
PURPOSE: The incidence of estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer is higher among whitewomen relative to black women. In two large prospective cohorts, the Black Women's Health Study (BWHS) and the Nurses' Health Study II (NHSII), we investigated whether reproductive factors explain the difference. METHODS: During 1,582,083 person-years of follow-up of 140,914 women observed from 1995 to 2007, 327 ER+ breast cancers were identified among black women in BWHS and NHSII and 1,179 among whitewomen in NHSII. Cox proportional hazards regression models, stratified by race and pooled, were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for the association of race, parity, age at first birth, and lactation in relation to risk of ER+ cancer with adjustment for age and other breast cancer risk factors. RESULTS: Age at first birth differed markedly in the two groups, with 66 % of parous black women having their first child before age 25 as compared with 36 % of whitewomen. Each additional year of age at first birth was associated with a 4 % increased risk of ER+ breast cancer among both racial groups. Relative to nulliparous women, parous women were at decreased risk of ER+ breast cancer (HR 0.59, 95 % CI 0.20, 1.77), in black women and (HR 0.63, 95 % CI 0.45, 0.87) in whitewomen. The HR for the association of black race with ER+ cancer was 0.67 (95 % CI 0.53, 0.84) in a model that adjusted for age only, 0.77 (95 % CI 0.61, 0.99) in a model that controlled for parity, age at first birth, and other reproductive/hormonal factors, and 0.83 (95 % CI 0.70, 0.98) in a model that additionally controlled for other breast cancer risk factors such as alcohol consumption and use of hormone supplements. Similar associations were seen among premenopausal women and in an analysis restricted to ER+PR+ tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Reproductive factors explained some of the higher incidence of ER+ tumors among whitewomen as compared to black women.
Authors: Christina A Clarke; Theresa H M Keegan; Juan Yang; David J Press; Allison W Kurian; Anish H Patel; James V Lacey Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2012-07-05 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: William F Anderson; Nilanjan Chatterjee; William B Ershler; Otis W Brawley Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Valerie-Jeanne Bardou; Grazia Arpino; Richard M Elledge; C Kent Osborne; Gary M Clark Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-05-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Asma Ghafoor; Ahmedin Jemal; Elizabeth Ward; Vilma Cokkinides; Robert Smith; Michael Thun Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2003 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Graham A Colditz; Bernard A Rosner; Wendy Y Chen; Michelle D Holmes; Susan E Hankinson Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2004-02-04 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Lindsay A Williams; Andrew F Olshan; Chi-Chen Hong; Elisa V Bandera; Lynn Rosenberg; Ting-Yuan David Cheng; Kathryn L Lunetta; Susan E McCann; Charles Poole; Laurence N Kolonel; Julie R Palmer; Christine B Ambrosone; Melissa A Troester Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2017-04-18 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Amber N Hurson; Mustapha Abubakar; Alina M Hamilton; Kathleen Conway; Katherine A Hoadley; Michael I Love; Andrew F Olshan; Charles M Perou; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Melissa A Troester Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2021-11-04 Impact factor: 4.090
Authors: Esther M John; Amanda I Phipps; Lisa M Hines; Jocelyn Koo; Sue A Ingles; Kathy B Baumgartner; Martha L Slattery; Anna H Wu Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2020-02-29 Impact factor: 7.396