Literature DB >> 34737209

TP53 Pathway Function, Estrogen Receptor Status, and Breast Cancer Risk Factors in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study.

Amber N Hurson1,2, Mustapha Abubakar2, Alina M Hamilton3, Kathleen Conway1, Katherine A Hoadley4,5, Michael I Love5,6, Andrew F Olshan1, Charles M Perou5, Montserrat Garcia-Closas2, Melissa A Troester7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: TP53 and estrogen receptor (ER) both play essential roles in breast cancer development and progression, with recent research revealing cross-talk between TP53 and ER signaling pathways. Although many studies have demonstrated heterogeneity of risk factor associations across ER subtypes, associations by TP53 status have been inconsistent.
METHODS: This case-case analysis included incident breast cancer cases (47% Black) from the Carolina Breast Cancer Study (1993-2013). Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples were classified for TP53 functional status (mutant-like/wild-type-like) using a validated RNA signature. For IHC-based TP53 status, mutant-like was classified as at least 10% positivity. We used two-stage polytomous logistic regression to evaluate risk factor heterogeneity due to RNA-based TP53 and/or ER, adjusting for each other and for PR, HER2, and grade. We then compared this with the results when using IHC-based TP53 classification.
RESULTS: The RNA-based classifier identified 55% of tumors as TP53 wild-type-like and 45% as mutant-like. Several hormone-related factors (oral contraceptive use, menopausal status, age at menopause, and pre- and postmenopausal body mass index) were associated with TP53 mutant-like status, whereas reproductive factors (age at first birth and parity) and smoking were associated with ER status. Multiparity was associated with both TP53 and ER. When classifying TP53 status using IHC methods, no associations were observed with TP53. Associations observed with RNA-based TP53 remained after accounting for basal-like subtype.
CONCLUSIONS: This case-case study found breast cancer risk factors associated with RNA-based TP53 and ER. IMPACT: RNA-based TP53 and ER represent an emerging etiologic schema of interest in breast cancer prevention research. ©2021 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34737209      PMCID: PMC8755611          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-21-0661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.090


  49 in total

1.  Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study.

Authors:  Lisa A Carey; Charles M Perou; Chad A Livasy; Lynn G Dressler; David Cowan; Kathleen Conway; Gamze Karaca; Melissa A Troester; Chiu Kit Tse; Sharon Edmiston; Sandra L Deming; Joseph Geradts; Maggie C U Cheang; Torsten O Nielsen; Patricia G Moorman; H Shelton Earp; Robert C Millikan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  The Carolina Breast Cancer Study: integrating population-based epidemiology and molecular biology.

Authors:  B Newman; P G Moorman; R Millikan; B F Qaqish; J Geradts; T E Aldrich; E T Liu
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  TP53 mutation spectrum in breast cancer is subtype specific and has distinct prognostic relevance.

Authors:  Laxmi Silwal-Pandit; Hans Kristian Moen Vollan; Suet-Feung Chin; Oscar M Rueda; Steven McKinney; Tomo Osako; David A Quigley; Vessela N Kristensen; Samuel Aparicio; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; Carlos Caldas; Anita Langerød
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Racial Differences in PAM50 Subtypes in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study.

Authors:  Melissa A Troester; Xuezheng Sun; Emma H Allott; Joseph Geradts; Stephanie M Cohen; Chiu-Kit Tse; Erin L Kirk; Leigh B Thorne; Michelle Mathews; Yan Li; Zhiyuan Hu; Whitney R Robinson; Katherine A Hoadley; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Katherine E Reeder-Hayes; H Shelton Earp; Andrew F Olshan; Lisa A Carey; Charles M Perou
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Etiology of hormone receptor positive breast cancer differs by levels of histologic grade and proliferation.

Authors:  Mustapha Abubakar; Jenny Chang-Claude; H Raza Ali; Nilanjan Chatterjee; Penny Coulson; Frances Daley; Fiona Blows; Javier Benitez; Roger L Milne; Hermann Brenner; Christa Stegmaier; Arto Mannermaa; Anja Rudolph; Peter Sinn; Fergus J Couch; Peter Devilee; Rob A E M Tollenaar; Caroline Seynaeve; Jonine Figueroa; Jolanta Lissowska; Stephen Hewitt; Maartje J Hooning; Antoinette Hollestelle; Renée Foekens; Linetta B Koppert; Manjeet K Bolla; Qin Wang; Michael E Jones; Minouk J Schoemaker; Renske Keeman; Douglas F Easton; Anthony J Swerdlow; Mark E Sherman; Marjanka K Schmidt; Paul D Pharoah; Montserrat Garcia-Closas
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2018-03-25       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  p53 mutation, deprivation and poor prognosis in primary breast cancer.

Authors:  L Baker; P R Quinlan; N Patten; A Ashfield; L-J Birse-Stewart-Bell; C McCowan; J-C Bourdon; C A Purdie; L B Jordan; J A Dewar; L Wu; A M Thompson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-09-23       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Reproductive profiles and risk of breast cancer subtypes: a multi-center case-only study.

Authors:  Olivier Brouckaert; Anja Rudolph; Annouschka Laenen; Renske Keeman; Manjeet K Bolla; Qin Wang; Adelheid Soubry; Hans Wildiers; Irene L Andrulis; Volker Arndt; Matthias W Beckmann; Javier Benitez; Carl Blomqvist; Stig E Bojesen; Hiltrud Brauch; Paul Brennan; Hermann Brenner; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Ji-Yeob Choi; Sten Cornelissen; Fergus J Couch; Angela Cox; Simon S Cross; Kamila Czene; Mikael Eriksson; Peter A Fasching; Jonine Figueroa; Henrik Flyger; Graham G Giles; Anna González-Neira; Pascal Guénel; Per Hall; Antoinette Hollestelle; John L Hopper; Hidemi Ito; Michael Jones; Daehee Kang; Julia A Knight; Veli-Matti Kosma; Jingmei Li; Annika Lindblom; Jenna Lilyquist; Artitaya Lophatananon; Arto Mannermaa; Siranoush Manoukian; Sara Margolin; Keitaro Matsuo; Kenneth Muir; Heli Nevanlinna; Paolo Peterlongo; Katri Pylkäs; Suleeporn Saajrang; Caroline Seynaeve; Chen-Yang Shen; Xiao-Ou Shu; Melissa C Southey; Anthony Swerdlow; Soo-Hwang Teo; Rob A E M Tollenaar; Thérèse Truong; Chiu-Chen Tseng; Alexandra J van den Broek; Carolien H M van Deurzen; Robert Winqvist; Anna H Wu; Cheng Har Yip; Jyh-Cherng Yu; Wei Zheng; Roger L Milne; Paul D P Pharoah; Douglas F Easton; Marjanka K Schmidt; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Jenny Chang-Claude; Diether Lambrechts; Patrick Neven
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  Clinicopathological and epidemiological significance of breast cancer subtype reclassification based on p53 immunohistochemical expression.

Authors:  Mustapha Abubakar; Changyuan Guo; Ning Lu; Xiaohong R Yang; Hela Koka; Hyuna Sung; Nan Shao; Jennifer Guida; Joseph Deng; Mengjie Li; Nan Hu; Bin Zhou
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2019-07-25

10.  A mixed-model approach for powerful testing of genetic associations with cancer risk incorporating tumor characteristics.

Authors:  Haoyu Zhang; Ni Zhao; Thomas U Ahearn; William Wheeler; Montserrat García-Closas; Nilanjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 5.899

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.