BACKGROUND: Previous studies provide evidence that breast cancers occurring in different age and ethnic groups are not evenly distributed with regard to their biologic, pathologic and clinical characteristics. We evaluated the distributions of 11 pathological and biological variables between African-American (AA) and white patients and between three different age groups (20-39, 40-59 and 60-74 years). We examined whether racial differences existed across levels of age. METHODS: Data were obtained from the Carolina Breast Cancer Study (CBCS), a population-based, case-control study of breast cancer in North Carolina. Eighty hundred and sixty one women with a first diagnosis of invasive breast cancer participated in Phase I of the CBCS. Diagnostic paraffin blocks were obtained from 807 cases. One representative block was scored for histologic type and grade (architectural, nuclear, mitotic and overall). Medical chart review yielded tumor size, lymph node status, distant metastases, stage, hormone receptor status (ER/PR) and DNA ploidy. RESULTS: Pathologically advanced tumors (large size, high grade, high stage, ER/PR negative) were significantly more common in young and AA women. Racial differences varied by age. Among younger, AAs and whites differed only with respect to ER/PR status, while among older women AAs and whites differed only with respect to stage at diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study confirm the presence of poorer prognosis breast cancer among AA and younger women. They also highlight the need for age and race to be considered together when evaluating pathologic and biologic characteristics of disease and when making inferences regarding tumor aggressiveness.
BACKGROUND: Previous studies provide evidence that breast cancers occurring in different age and ethnic groups are not evenly distributed with regard to their biologic, pathologic and clinical characteristics. We evaluated the distributions of 11 pathological and biological variables between African-American (AA) and white patients and between three different age groups (20-39, 40-59 and 60-74 years). We examined whether racial differences existed across levels of age. METHODS: Data were obtained from the Carolina Breast Cancer Study (CBCS), a population-based, case-control study of breast cancer in North Carolina. Eighty hundred and sixty one women with a first diagnosis of invasive breast cancer participated in Phase I of the CBCS. Diagnostic paraffin blocks were obtained from 807 cases. One representative block was scored for histologic type and grade (architectural, nuclear, mitotic and overall). Medical chart review yielded tumor size, lymph node status, distant metastases, stage, hormone receptor status (ER/PR) and DNA ploidy. RESULTS: Pathologically advanced tumors (large size, high grade, high stage, ER/PR negative) were significantly more common in young and AA women. Racial differences varied by age. Among younger, AAs and whites differed only with respect to ER/PR status, while among older women AAs and whites differed only with respect to stage at diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study confirm the presence of poorer prognosis breast cancer among AA and younger women. They also highlight the need for age and race to be considered together when evaluating pathologic and biologic characteristics of disease and when making inferences regarding tumor aggressiveness.
Authors: Lynn Rosenberg; Deborah A Boggs; Lauren A Wise; Lucile L Adams-Campbell; Julie R Palmer Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2010-07-20 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Roger T Anderson; Tse-Chang Yang; Stephen A Matthews; Fabian Camacho; Teresa Kern; Heath B Mackley; Gretchen Kimmick; Christopher Louis; Eugene Lengerich; Nengliang Yao Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2013-09-30 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Erica T Warner; Rulla M Tamimi; Deborah A Boggs; Bernard Rosner; Lynn Rosenberg; Graham A Colditz; Julie R Palmer Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2013-02-05 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Paula M Lantz; Mahasin Mujahid; Kendra Schwartz; Nancy K Janz; Angela Fagerlin; Barbara Salem; Lihua Liu; Dennis Deapen; Steven J Katz Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2006-10-31 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Katie M O'Brien; Stephen R Cole; Charles Poole; Jeannette T Bensen; Amy H Herring; Lawrence S Engel; Robert C Millikan Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2013-11-10 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Lynn Chollet-Hinton; Andrew F Olshan; Hazel B Nichols; Carey K Anders; Jennifer L Lund; Emma H Allott; Traci N Bethea; Chi-Chen Hong; Stephanie M Cohen; Thaer Khoury; Gary R Zirpoli; Virginia F Borges; Lynn A Rosenberg; Elisa V Bandera; Christine B Ambrosone; Julie R Palmer; Melissa A Troester Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2017-09-13 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Shaheenah Dawood; Kristine Broglio; Shu-Wan Kau; Marjorie C Green; Sharon H Giordano; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Thomas A Buchholz; Constance Albarracin; Wei T Yang; Bryan T J Hennessy; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Ana Maria Gonzalez-Angulo Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-12-01 Impact factor: 44.544