Literature DB >> 20696544

Knowledge, satisfaction with information, decisional conflict and psychological morbidity amongst women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

Simone De Morgan1, Sally Redman, Catherine D'Este, Kris Rogers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess knowledge, satisfaction with information, decisional conflict and psychological morbidity amongst women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and to explore the factors associated with less knowledge and greater confusion about DCIS.
METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of women diagnosed with DCIS in Australia (N=144).
RESULTS: This study found misunderstanding and confusion amongst women diagnosed with DCIS and a desire for more information about their breast disease. Approximately half of participants worried about their breast disease metastasizing; approximately half expressed high decisional conflict; 12% were anxious and 2% were depressed. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that worry about dying from the breast disease was significantly associated with not knowing that DCIS could not metastasize (OR 3.9; 95% CI 1.03-14.25); and confusion about whether DCIS could metastasize was significantly associated with dissatisfaction with information (OR 12.5; 95% CI 3.8-40.2).
CONCLUSION: Good communication about how DCIS differs from invasive breast cancer is essential to alleviating the confusion and worry amongst women with DCIS. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Recommendations about how best to communicate a diagnosis of DCIS, including the uncertainties, are needed to guide health professionals to promote better understanding about DCIS and increase the well-being of women with DCIS.
Copyright © 2010. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20696544     DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  16 in total

1.  Challenges in ductal carcinoma in situ risk communication and decision-making: report from an American Cancer Society and National Cancer Institute workshop.

Authors:  Ann H Partridge; Joann G Elmore; Debbie Saslow; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Stuart J Schnitt
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 508.702

2.  End-of-Life Decision Making and Communication of Bereaved Family Members of African Americans with Serious Illness.

Authors:  Esther R Smith-Howell; Susan E Hickman; Salimah H Meghani; Susan M Perkins; Susan M Rawl
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.947

3.  Informational needs of gastrointestinal oncology patients.

Authors:  Janet Papadakos; Sara Urowitz; Craig Olmstead; Audrey Jusko Friedman; Jason Zhu; Pamela Catton
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Development and pilot testing of a communication aid to assist clinicians to communicate with women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

Authors:  Simone E De Morgan; Phyllis N Butow; Elizabeth A Lobb; Melanie A Price; Caroline Nehill
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  "Is it cancer or not?" A qualitative exploration of survivor concerns surrounding the diagnosis and treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Shoshana M Rosenberg; Jennifer M Gierisch; Anna C Revette; Carol L Lowenstein; Elizabeth S Frank; Deborah E Collyar; Thomas Lynch; Alastair M Thompson; Ann H Partridge; E Shelley Hwang
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 6.921

Review 6.  Developing a theoretical framework to illustrate associations among patient satisfaction, body image and quality of life for women undergoing breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Michelle Cororve Fingeret; Summer W Nipomnick; Melissa A Crosby; Gregory P Reece
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 12.111

7.  Ductal carcinoma in situ: knowledge of associated risks and prognosis among Latina and non-Latina white women.

Authors:  Aparna R Parikh; Celia Patricia Kaplan; Nancy J Burke; Jennifer Livaudais-Toman; E Shelley Hwang; Leah S Karliner
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 4.624

8.  How different terminology for ductal carcinoma in situ impacts women's concern and treatment preferences: a randomised comparison within a national community survey.

Authors:  Kirsten McCaffery; Brooke Nickel; Ray Moynihan; Jolyn Hersch; Armando Teixeira-Pinto; Les Irwig; Alexandra Barratt
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Decisional conflict in patients considering diagnostic thyroidectomy with indeterminate fine needle aspirate cytopathology.

Authors:  Benjamin A Taylor; Robert D Hart; Matthew H Rigby; Jonathan Trites; S Mark Taylor; Paul Hong
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-02-27

10.  Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): The importance of patient-reported outcomes (PRO).

Authors:  Laura S Dominici; Shoshana M Rosenberg
Journal:  Curr Breast Cancer Rep       Date:  2020-04-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.