Irene Teo1,2, Gregory P Reece2, Israel C Christie3, Michele Guindani3, Mia K Markey4,5, Leslie J Heinberg6, Melissa A Crosby2, Michelle Cororve Fingeret1,2. 1. Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 2. Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 3. Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 4. Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA. 5. Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 6. Bariatric & Metabolic Institute, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The process of cancer-related breast reconstruction is typically multi-staged and can take months to years to complete, yet few studies have examined patient psychosocial well-being during the reconstruction process. We investigated the effects of reconstruction timing and reconstruction stage on body image and quality of life at specific time points during the breast reconstruction process. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 216 patients were grouped into four reconstructive stages: pre-reconstruction, completed stage 1, completed stage 2, and final stages. Multiple regression analyses examined the roles of reconstruction timing (immediate vs delayed reconstruction) and reconstruction stage as well as their interaction in predicting body image and quality of life, controlling for patient age, BMI, type of reconstruction, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and major complication(s). RESULTS: A difference in pattern of body image was observed across the reconstructive stages, with those receiving delayed reconstruction showing significant decrease in body image dissatisfaction compared with those with immediate reconstruction. At pre-reconstruction, patients awaiting delayed reconstruction reported significantly lower social well-being compared with those awaiting immediate reconstruction. Reconstruction stage predicted emotional well-being, with higher emotional well-being observed in those who had commenced reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Timing and stage of reconstruction are important to consider when examining psychosocial outcomes of breast cancer patients undergoing reconstruction. Those waiting to initiate delayed reconstruction appear at particular risk for body image, emotional, and social distress. Our findings have implications for delivery of psychosocial treatment to maximize body image and quality of life of patients undergoing cancer-related breast reconstruction.
OBJECTIVE: The process of cancer-related breast reconstruction is typically multi-staged and can take months to years to complete, yet few studies have examined patient psychosocial well-being during the reconstruction process. We investigated the effects of reconstruction timing and reconstruction stage on body image and quality of life at specific time points during the breast reconstruction process. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 216 patients were grouped into four reconstructive stages: pre-reconstruction, completed stage 1, completed stage 2, and final stages. Multiple regression analyses examined the roles of reconstruction timing (immediate vs delayed reconstruction) and reconstruction stage as well as their interaction in predicting body image and quality of life, controlling for patient age, BMI, type of reconstruction, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and major complication(s). RESULTS: A difference in pattern of body image was observed across the reconstructive stages, with those receiving delayed reconstruction showing significant decrease in body image dissatisfaction compared with those with immediate reconstruction. At pre-reconstruction, patients awaiting delayed reconstruction reported significantly lower social well-being compared with those awaiting immediate reconstruction. Reconstruction stage predicted emotional well-being, with higher emotional well-being observed in those who had commenced reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Timing and stage of reconstruction are important to consider when examining psychosocial outcomes of breast cancerpatients undergoing reconstruction. Those waiting to initiate delayed reconstruction appear at particular risk for body image, emotional, and social distress. Our findings have implications for delivery of psychosocial treatment to maximize body image and quality of life of patients undergoing cancer-related breast reconstruction.
Authors: C S Carver; C Pozo-Kaderman; A A Price; V Noriega; S D Harris; R P Derhagopian; D S Robinson; F L Moffat Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 1998 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Gedge D Rosson; Sachin M Shridharani; Michael Magarakis; Michele A Manahan; Basak Basdag; Marta M Gilson; Andrea L Pusic Journal: Microsurgery Date: 2013-02-17 Impact factor: 2.425
Authors: M J Brady; D F Cella; F Mo; A E Bonomi; D S Tulsky; S R Lloyd; S Deasy; M Cobleigh; G Shiomoto Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1997-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Mugdha Dabeer; Michelle Cororve Fingeret; Fatima Merchant; Gregory P Reece; Elisabeth K Beahm; Mia K Markey Journal: Breast Cancer (Auckl) Date: 2008-06-16
Authors: Shantanu N Razdan; Peter G Cordeiro; Claudia R Albornoz; Joseph J Disa; Hina J Panchal; Alice Y Ho; Adeyiza O Momoh; Evan Matros Journal: J Reconstr Microsurg Date: 2017-02-24 Impact factor: 2.873
Authors: Jihye Park; Juan L Rodriguez; Katie M O'Brien; Hazel B Nichols; M Elizabeth Hodgson; Clarice R Weinberg; Dale P Sandler Journal: Cancer Date: 2020-11-25 Impact factor: 6.921
Authors: Maria Herrera de la Muela; Enrique García López; Laura Frías Aldeguer; Paloma Gómez-Campelo Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-12-19 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: E Heeg; M B Jensen; M A M Mureau; B Ejlertsen; R A E M Tollenaar; P M Christiansen; M T F D Vrancken Peeters Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2020-06-10 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Hanae K Tokita; Thais O Polanco; Meghana G Shamsunder; Stefan Dabic; Vaidehi G Patel; Robert J Allen; Joseph H Dayan; Babak J Mehrara; Evan Matros; Jonas A Nelson Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2019-06-14