OBJECTIVES: Body image is a critical issue for cancer patients undergoing reconstructive surgery, as they can experience disfigurement and functional impairment. Distress related to appearance changes can lead to various psychosocial difficulties, and patients are often reluctant to discuss these issues with their healthcare team. Our goals were to design and evaluate a screening tool to aid providers in identifying patients who may benefit from referral for specialized psychosocial care to treat body image concerns. METHODS: We designed a brief four-item instrument and administered it at a single time point to cancer patients who were undergoing reconstructive treatment. We used simple and multinomial regression models to evaluate whether survey responses, demographic, or clinical variables predicted interest and enrollment in counseling. RESULTS: Over 95% of the sample (n = 248) endorsed some concerns, preoccupation, or avoidance because of appearance changes. Approximately one-third of patients were interested in obtaining counseling or additional information to assist with body image distress. Each survey item significantly predicted interest and enrollment in counseling. Concern about future appearance changes was the single best predictor of counseling enrollment. Sex, age, and cancer type were not predictive of counseling interest or enrollment. CONCLUSIONS: We present initial data supporting use of the Body Image Screener for Cancer Reconstruction. Our findings suggest benefits of administering this tool to patients presenting for reconstructive surgery. It is argued that screening and treatment for body image distress should be provided to this patient population at the earliest possible time point.
OBJECTIVES: Body image is a critical issue for cancerpatients undergoing reconstructive surgery, as they can experience disfigurement and functional impairment. Distress related to appearance changes can lead to various psychosocial difficulties, and patients are often reluctant to discuss these issues with their healthcare team. Our goals were to design and evaluate a screening tool to aid providers in identifying patients who may benefit from referral for specialized psychosocial care to treat body image concerns. METHODS: We designed a brief four-item instrument and administered it at a single time point to cancerpatients who were undergoing reconstructive treatment. We used simple and multinomial regression models to evaluate whether survey responses, demographic, or clinical variables predicted interest and enrollment in counseling. RESULTS: Over 95% of the sample (n = 248) endorsed some concerns, preoccupation, or avoidance because of appearance changes. Approximately one-third of patients were interested in obtaining counseling or additional information to assist with body image distress. Each survey item significantly predicted interest and enrollment in counseling. Concern about future appearance changes was the single best predictor of counseling enrollment. Sex, age, and cancer type were not predictive of counseling interest or enrollment. CONCLUSIONS: We present initial data supporting use of the Body Image Screener for Cancer Reconstruction. Our findings suggest benefits of administering this tool to patients presenting for reconstructive surgery. It is argued that screening and treatment for body image distress should be provided to this patient population at the earliest possible time point.
Authors: Pat Fobair; Susan L Stewart; Subo Chang; Carol D'Onofrio; Priscilla J Banks; Joan R Bloom Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Michelle Cororve Fingeret; Damon J Vidrine; Gregory P Reece; Ann M Gillenwater; Ellen R Gritz Journal: Head Neck Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Andrea L Pusic; Anne F Klassen; Amie M Scott; Jennifer A Klok; Peter G Cordeiro; Stefan J Cano Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: William F Pirl; Anna Muriel; Vivian Hwang; Alice Kornblith; Joseph Greer; Karen Donelan; Donna B Greenberg; Jennifer Temel; Lidia Schapira Journal: J Support Oncol Date: 2007 Nov-Dec
Authors: Shoshana M Rosenberg; Rulla M Tamimi; Shari Gelber; Kathryn J Ruddy; Sandra Kereakoglow; Virginia F Borges; Steven E Come; Lidia Schapira; Eric P Winer; Ann H Partridge Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2012-11-07 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Mark A Ellis; Katherine R Sterba; Terry A Day; Courtney H Marsh; Stacy Maurer; Elizabeth G Hill; Evan M Graboyes Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2019-04-09 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Roberta Spatuzzi; Anna Vespa; Primo Lorenzi; Guido Miccinesi; Marcello Ricciuti; Wanda Cifarelli; Marina Susi; Tommaso Fabrizio; Maria G Ferrari; Marica Ottaviani; Maria V Giulietti; Fabiana Merico; Michele Aieta Journal: Breast Care (Basel) Date: 2016-02-03 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Chindhu Shunmuga Sundaram; Haryana M Dhillon; Phyllis N Butow; Puma Sundaresan; Claudia Rutherford Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-06-15 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Stacy Tessler Lindau; Emily M Abramsohn; Shirley R Baron; Judith Florendo; Hope K Haefner; Anuja Jhingran; Vanessa Kennedy; Mukta K Krane; David M Kushner; Jennifer McComb; Diane F Merritt; Julie E Park; Amy Siston; Margaret Straub; Lauren Streicher Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2016-01-19 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Hilary Weingarden; Sabine Wilhelm; Jamie M Jacobs; Julia Carrellas; Curtis Cetrulo; William Gerald Austen; Amy S Colwell Journal: Body Image Date: 2022-06-09
Authors: Maria Cherba; Boris H J M Brummans; Michael P Hier; Lauriane Giguère; Gabrielle Chartier; Hannah Jacobs; Véronique-Isabelle Forest; Alex Mlynarek; Khalil Sultanem; Melissa Henry Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2022-05-05 Impact factor: 3.109