Literature DB >> 25692166

Biomechanical Comparison Between Bashti Bone Plug Technique and Biodegradable Screw for Fixation of Grafts in Ligament surgery.

Kaveh Bashti1, Mohammad N Tahmasebi1, Hasan Kaseb1, Farzam Farahmand1, Mohammad Akbar1, Amir Mobini1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ligament reconstruction is a common procedure in orthopedic surgery. Although several popular techniques are currently in use, new methods are proposed for secure fixation of the tendon graft into the bone tunnel. PURPOSES: We sought to introduce our new technique of Bashti bone plug for fixation of soft tissue graft in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and to compare its biomechanical features with conventional absorbable interference screw technique in a bovine model.
METHODS: Twenty pairs of bovine knees were harvested after death. Soft tissue was removed and the Achilles tendon was harvested to be used as an ACL graft. It was secured into the bone tunnel on the tibial side via two different methods: Bashti Bone Plug technique and conventional screw method. Biomechanical strength was measured using 200 N and 300 N cyclic loading on the graft. Pull out strength was also tested until the graft fails.
RESULTS: No graft failure was observed after 200 N and 300 N cyclic loading in either fixation methods. When testing for pull out failure, 21 tendons (53%) were torn and 19 tendons (48%) slipped out. No fixation failure occurred, which did not reveal a significant difference between the bone plug or interference screw group (P=0.11). The mean pull out force until failure of the graft was 496±66 N in the screw group and 503±67 N in the bone plug group (P=0.76).
CONCLUSIONS: Our suggested fixation technique of Bashti bone plug is a native, cheap, and feasible method that provides comparable biomechanical strength with interference screw when soft tissue fixation was attempted in bovine model.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior cruciate ligament; Bashti; Biomechanical strength; Bone plug; Bovine model; Initial fixation; Interference screw; Reconstruction

Year:  2015        PMID: 25692166      PMCID: PMC4322121     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg        ISSN: 2345-461X


  20 in total

1.  Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with patellar-tendon autograft and interference screw fixation. The results at seven years.

Authors:  N M Jomha; L A Pinczewski; A Clingeleffer; D D Otto
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1999-09

2.  A prospective randomized comparison of bioabsorbable and titanium anterior cruciate ligament interference screws.

Authors:  Christopher Kaeding; Jack Farr; Tim Kavanaugh; Angela Pedroza
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  A new technique for femoral and tibial tunnel bone grafting using the OATS harvesters in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Hatem G Said; Khalid Baloch; Marcus Green
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Comparison of initial fixation strength between biodegradable and metallic interference screws and a press-fit fixation technique in a porcine model.

Authors:  R Seil; S Rupp; P W Krauss; A Benz; D M Kohn
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Bone tunnel widening with autogenous bone plugs versus bioabsorbable interference screws for secondary fixation in ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Seung-Ju Kim; Ji-Hoon Bae; Sang-Heon Song; Hong-Chul Lim
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Biomechanical evaluation of interference screw fixation in a bovine patellar bone-tendon-bone autograft complex for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  M Hulstyn; P D Fadale; J Abate; W R Walsh
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Improved outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadrupled hamstring autografts and additional bone plug augmentation at five year follow-up.

Authors:  Sven Nebelung; Gregor Deitmer; Rolf Gebing; Frank Reichwein; Wolfgang Nebelung
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 8.  Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Ha Sung Kim; Jong Keun Seon; Ah Reum Jo
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2013-11-29

9.  Isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients aged fifty years: comparison of hamstring graft versus bone-patellar tendon-bone graft.

Authors:  Johannes Struewer; Ewgeni Ziring; Ludwig Oberkircher; Karl F Schüttler; Turgay Efe
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-02-03       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Biomechanical comparison of rotational activities between anterior cruciate ligament- and posterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed patients.

Authors:  Bee Oh Lim; Han Sol Shin; Yong Seuk Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 4.342

View more
  3 in total

1.  Bone density may affect primary stability of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction when organic core bone plug fixation technique used.

Authors:  Pouya Dehestani; Farzam Farahmand; Amirhossein Borjali; Kaveh Bashti; Mahmoud Chizari
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2022-01-06

2.  Comparison of mechanical properties in interference screw fixation technique and organic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction method: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Amirhossein Borjali; Amir Nourani; Hadi Moeinnia; Mahdi Mohseni; Hossein Korani; Narges Ghias; Mahmoud Chizari
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Novel biodegradable magnesium alloy clips compared with titanium clips for hepatectomy in a rat model.

Authors:  Takeshi Urade; Toshihiko Yoshida; Naoko Ikeo; Kosuke Naka; Masahiro Kido; Hirochika Toyama; Kimihiko Ueno; Motofumi Tanaka; Toshiji Mukai; Takumi Fukumoto
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 2.102

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.