Literature DB >> 2337546

Calculating the predictive power of the Henson field screener in a population at risk of glaucomatous field loss.

S A Vernon1, D J Henry, S J Jones.   

Abstract

Suprathreshold field screeners are in common use for the detection of glaucomatous field loss. The predictive power of a positive result (PP+) depends on the sensitivity and specificity of the screener in the population in which it is to be used. Using data from 755 normal individuals (1510 eyes), we calculated the PP+ of the Henson CFS2000 screening programme for a population aged 50 and over. 4.3% of normal eyes failed the screening programme. Ignoring one or two misses on the screening programme immediately adjacent to the disc reduced this figure to 1.3% and significantly improved the PP+ of the programme. Calculations of the PP+ at increasing glaucoma prevalence levels indicates this to be particularly relevant at low levels such as those encountered when screening middle aged and elderly populations. Optometrists should perform routine field analysis when screening for glaucoma provided they adhere to strict protocols.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2337546      PMCID: PMC1042065          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.74.4.220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  11 in total

1.  Do optometrists screen for glaucoma?

Authors:  S A Vernon; D J Henry
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  The Framingham Eye Study. I. Outline and major prevalence findings.

Authors:  H A Kahn; H M Leibowitz; J P Ganley; M M Kini; T Colton; R S Nickerson; T R Dawber
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  The influence of refraction accuracy on automated perimetric threshold measurements.

Authors:  D K Heuer; D R Anderson; W J Feuer; M G Gressel
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Current status of automated perimetry. Is the ideal automated perimeter available?

Authors:  J L Keltner; C A Johnson
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-03

5.  Duration of automated suprathreshold vs quantitative threshold field examination. Impact of age and ocular status.

Authors:  O Kosoko; A Sommer; C Auer
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-03

6.  Revised Framingham eye study prevalence of glaucoma and diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  H A Kahn; R C Milton
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  A pilot project of glaucoma in Barbados.

Authors:  M C Leske; A M Connell; R Kehoe
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Intra-ocular pressure, glaucoma, and glaucoma suspects in a defined population.

Authors:  F C Hollows; P A Graham
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1966-10       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Optic nerve damage in human glaucoma. III. Quantitative correlation of nerve fiber loss and visual field defect in glaucoma, ischemic neuropathy, papilledema, and toxic neuropathy.

Authors:  H A Quigley; E M Addicks; W R Green
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1982-01

10.  The mode of progressive disc cupping in ocular hypertension and glaucoma.

Authors:  J E Pederson; D R Anderson
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1980-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.