Literature DB >> 3431825

The influence of refraction accuracy on automated perimetric threshold measurements.

D K Heuer1, D R Anderson, W J Feuer, M G Gressel.   

Abstract

The effect of refraction accuracy on the differential light threshold of a Goldmann size III (0.43 degrees diameter) stimulus was evaluated in the right eyes of five normal subjects with randomly ordered sequence of plano, +1.00-, +2.00-, +3.00-, +4.00-, +5.00-, and +6.00-diopter (D) spherical overcorrections. Threshold measurements were performed at 0 degree, 5 degrees, 10 degrees, 15 degrees, 20 degrees, and 25 degrees eccentricity nasally along the 180 degrees meridian with the F4 program on the Octopus 201 perimeter. The +1.00- through +6.00-D overcorrections decreased the threshold values by an average of 1.4, 2.9, 4.2, 5.6, 6.7, and 7.6 dB, respectively, compared with the plano overcorrection. The depression of the differential light threshold was of similar magnitude at all eccentricities within the central 25 degrees.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3431825     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(87)33248-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  7 in total

1.  Assessing spatial and temporal properties of perimetric stimuli for resistance to clinical variations in retinal illumination.

Authors:  William H Swanson; Mitchell W Dul; Douglas G Horner; Tiffany Liu; Irene Tran
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Calculating the predictive power of the Henson field screener in a population at risk of glaucomatous field loss.

Authors:  S A Vernon; D J Henry; S J Jones
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 3.  Automated perimetry in glaucoma--room for improvement?

Authors:  C O'Brien; J M Wild
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  The influence of stimulus parameters on the visual field indices by automated projection perimetry.

Authors:  M Dengler-Harles; J M Wild; M D Cole; E C O'Neill
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Use of a blue filter in visual field analysis.

Authors:  C E Hugkulstone; S A Vernon
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Blur-resistant perimetric stimuli.

Authors:  Douglas G Horner; Mitchell W Dul; William H Swanson; Tiffany Liu; Irene Tran
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Optimizing contrast sensitivity perimetry for clinical use.

Authors:  Mitchell W Dul
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2013-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.