Literature DB >> 2630356

Do optometrists screen for glaucoma?

S A Vernon1, D J Henry.   

Abstract

A survey of optometrists practising in Nottingham was undertaken to identify their methods of screening for glaucoma in the community. There was found to be great variation in all parameters examined including referral criteria. Although all of the respondents screened for glaucoma, 50% appeared not to be aware of subtle optic disc signs of the disease, 8% never measured intra-ocular pressures and 19% never performed visual field analysis. In a general practice population age 50 and over, 73% of patients had visited their optician within the last two years, 67% knew glaucoma was an eye disease, but only 15% remembered being screened for glaucoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2630356     DOI: 10.1038/eye.1989.115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  5 in total

Review 1.  Screening for glaucoma. Why is the disease underdetected?

Authors:  M W Tuck; R P Crick
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.923

2.  Calculating the predictive power of the Henson field screener in a population at risk of glaucomatous field loss.

Authors:  S A Vernon; D J Henry; S J Jones
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Reproducibility with the Keeler Pulsair 2000 non-contact tonometer.

Authors:  S A Vernon
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Glaucoma screening clinic in general practice: prevalence of occult disease, and resource implications.

Authors:  J H Sheldrick; A J Sharp
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Screening siblings for glaucoma in the UK.

Authors:  S A Vernon
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 18.000

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.