Literature DB >> 3954641

Duration of automated suprathreshold vs quantitative threshold field examination. Impact of age and ocular status.

O Kosoko, A Sommer, C Auer.   

Abstract

We investigated the impact of age and ocular status on the duration of automated threshold and suprathreshold testing of the visual field in a study of 57 eyes with glaucomatous field loss, 58 eyes with ocular hypertension, and 190 eyes of normal controls. It was faster to run a three-zone threshold-related suprathreshold 120-point full-field screening test on younger subjects and normal controls than on older subjects or subjects with early glaucomatous field loss. In contrast, the time required for full quantitative thresholding of 76 points within the central 30 degrees was unaffected by either age or ocular status. Normal individuals required 40% more time to complete the quantitative threshold test than the "full-field" screening test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3954641     DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1986.01050150098036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0003-9950


  2 in total

1.  Calculating the predictive power of the Henson field screener in a population at risk of glaucomatous field loss.

Authors:  S A Vernon; D J Henry; S J Jones
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Visual field in hysteria-reliability of visual field by Goldmann perimetry.

Authors:  H Ohkubo
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 2.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.