Literature DB >> 23374630

A prospective window into medical device-related pressure ulcers in intensive care.

Fiona M Coyer1, Nancy A Stotts, Virginia Schmied Blackman.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence, severity, location, aetiology, treatment and healing of medical device-related pressure ulcers (PUs) in intensive care patients for up to 7 days. A prospective repeated measures study design was used. Patients in six intensive care units of two major medical centres, one each in Australia and the USA, were screened 1 day per month for 6 months. Those with device-related ulcers were followed daily for up to 7 days. The outcome measures were device-related ulcer prevalence, pain, infection, treatment and healing. Fifteen of 483 patients had device-related ulcers and 9 of 15 with 11 ulcers were followed beyond screening. Their mean age was 60·5 years, and most were men, overweight and at increased risk of PU. Endotracheal (ET) and nasogastric (NG) tubes were the cause of most device-related ulcers. Repositioning was the most frequent treatment. Four of 11 ulcers healed within the 7-day observation period. In conclusion, device-related ulcer prevalence was 3·1%, similar to that reported in the limited literature available, indicating an ongoing problem. Systematic assessment and repositioning of devices are the mainstays of care. We recommend continued prevalence determination and that nurses remain vigilant to prevent device-related ulcers, especially in patients with NG and ET tubes.
© 2013 The Authors. International Wound Journal © 2013 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Critical care; Cross-sectional study; Intensive care; Medical device-related pressure ulcer; Pressure ulcer; Prevalence; Prospective repeated measures

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23374630      PMCID: PMC7950785          DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  14 in total

1.  Recruiting patients to medical research: double blind randomised trial of "opt-in" versus "opt-out" strategies.

Authors:  Cornelia Junghans; Gene Feder; Harry Hemingway; Adam Timmis; Melvyn Jones
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-09-12

Review 2.  Preventing pressure ulcers with the Braden scale: an update on this easy-to-use tool that assesses a patient's risk.

Authors:  Barbara J Braden; JoAnn Maklebust; Joann Maklebust
Journal:  Am J Nurs       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.220

Review 3.  Risk assessment scales for pressure ulcer prevention: a systematic review.

Authors:  Pedro L Pancorbo-Hidalgo; Francisco Pedro Garcia-Fernandez; Isabel Ma Lopez-Medina; Carmen Alvarez-Nieto
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.187

4.  Preventing device-related pressure ulcers: using data to guide statewide change.

Authors:  Julie Apold; Diane Rydrych
Journal:  J Nurs Care Qual       Date:  2012 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.597

Review 5.  Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Marianne Jensen Hjermstad; Peter M Fayers; Dagny F Haugen; Augusto Caraceni; Geoffrey W Hanks; Jon H Loge; Robin Fainsinger; Nina Aass; Stein Kaasa
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.612

6.  Medical device related pressure ulcers in hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Joyce M Black; Janet E Cuddigan; Maralyn A Walko; L Alan Didier; Maria J Lander; Maureen R Kelpe
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.315

7.  Incidence and risk factors of pressure ulcers in seven neonatal intensive care units in Japan: a multisite prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Kumiko Fujii; Junko Sugama; Mayumi Okuwa; Hiromi Sanada; Yuko Mizokami
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.315

8.  Use of the SOFA score to assess the incidence of organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care units: results of a multicenter, prospective study. Working group on "sepsis-related problems" of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.

Authors:  J L Vincent; A de Mendonça; F Cantraine; R Moreno; J Takala; P M Suter; C L Sprung; F Colardyn; S Blecher
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 9.  Impact of pressure ulcers on quality of life in older patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Claudia Gorecki; Julia M Brown; E Andrea Nelson; Michelle Briggs; Lisette Schoonhoven; Carol Dealey; Tom Defloor; Jane Nixon
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 5.562

10.  Insult after injury: pressure ulcers in trauma patients.

Authors:  D Watts; E Abrahams; C MacMillan; J Sanat; R Silver; S VanGorder; M Waller; D York
Journal:  Orthop Nurs       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.913

View more
  17 in total

1.  Securement to prevent device-related pressure injuries in the intensive care unit: A randomised controlled feasibility study.

Authors:  Fiona Coyer; Jane-Louise Cook; Wendy Brown; Amanda Vann; Anna Doubrovsky
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-06-28       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Saudi Arabian adult intensive care unit pressure ulcer incidence and risk factors: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Nahla Tayyib; Fiona Coyer; Peter Lewis
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Pressure ulcer stage IV caused by cervical collar in patients with multiple trauma in intensive care unit.

Authors:  Abbas Abdoli Tafti; Sanaz Sajadi; Hossein Rafiei
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Evaluation of a fluidised positioner to reduce occipital pressure injuries in intensive care patients: A pilot study.

Authors:  Michelle Barakat-Johnson; Michelle Lai; Amit Gefen; Fiona Coyer
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Chronic wounds in Australia: A systematic review of key epidemiological and clinical parameters.

Authors:  Laura McCosker; Ruth Tulleners; Qinglu Cheng; Stefan Rohmer; Tamzin Pacella; Nick Graves; Rosana Pacella
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  Which endotracheal tube location minimises the device-related pressure ulcer risk: The centre or a corner of the mouth?

Authors:  Golan Amrani; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.315

7.  Incidence and risk factors for medical device-related pressure ulcers: The first report in this regard in Iran.

Authors:  Farnoosh Rashvand; Lida Shamekhi; Hossein Rafiei; Mohammad Nosrataghaei
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 3.315

8.  Endotracheal tube fastening device-related pressure necrosis of the upper lip.

Authors:  Dominik Greda; David Straka; Matthew Cooper; Russel Kahmke
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2020-02-19

9.  Prevalence and Analysis of Medical Device-Related Pressure Injuries: Results from the International Pressure Ulcer Prevalence Survey.

Authors:  Susan A Kayser; Catherine A VanGilder; Elizabeth A Ayello; Charlie Lachenbruch
Journal:  Adv Skin Wound Care       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.347

10.  Impact of the introduction of an endotracheal tube attachment device on the incidence and severity of oral pressure injuries in the intensive care unit: a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Jaye Hampson; Cameron Green; Joanne Stewart; Lauren Armitstead; Gemma Degan; Andrea Aubrey; Eldho Paul; Ravindranath Tiruvoipati
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2018-02-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.