Literature DB >> 32596937

Securement to prevent device-related pressure injuries in the intensive care unit: A randomised controlled feasibility study.

Fiona Coyer1,2, Jane-Louise Cook3, Wendy Brown4, Amanda Vann5, Anna Doubrovsky3.   

Abstract

Medical device-related pressure injuries are the most common cause of pressure injuries within the intensive care unit, in particular those caused by nasogastric tubes and endotracheal tubes. There are several known methods, which can alleviate the pressure of these devices on the skin surface to reduce the rate of these injuries. To determine the feasibility of conducting a larger, adequately powered trial testing, several clinically effective interventions to reduce the incidence of medical device-related pressure injuries caused by these devices. Patients were recruited into both study arms and received one of three different methods of skin protection for both arms. Outcome measures included fidelity to the processes of care protocol, recruitment potential, and the number of medical device-related pressure injuries. Recruitment (n = 87) was slower than expected with less than 10% of screened potential patients available for enrolment. Fidelity to the process of care for each subgroup was variable with better adherence in the nasogastric tube arm compared to the endotracheal tube arm. This feasibility study has revealed concerns about the intervention designs and effectiveness as well as challenges for the adherence of the nursing staff to the protocol.
© 2020 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  endotracheal tube; medical device-related pressure injury; nasogastric tube; prevention; securement

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32596937      PMCID: PMC7948617          DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13432

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  19 in total

1.  Securement to prevent device-related pressure injuries in the intensive care unit: A randomised controlled feasibility study.

Authors:  Fiona Coyer; Jane-Louise Cook; Wendy Brown; Amanda Vann; Anna Doubrovsky
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-06-28       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Reducing pressure injuries in critically ill patients by using a patient skin integrity care bundle (InSPiRE).

Authors:  Fiona Coyer; Anne Gardner; Anna Doubrovsky; Rae Cole; Frances Mary Ryan; Craig Allen; Greg McNamara
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.228

3.  Pressure injury prevalence in intensive care versus non-intensive care patients: A state-wide comparison.

Authors:  Fiona Coyer; Sandra Miles; Sandra Gosley; Paul Fulbrook; Kirstine Sketcher-Baker; Jane-Louise Cook; Jacqueline Whitmore
Journal:  Aust Crit Care       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 2.737

4.  The Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk.

Authors:  N Bergstrom; B J Braden; A Laguzza; V Holman
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  1987 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Serial evaluation of the SOFA score to predict outcome in critically ill patients.

Authors:  F L Ferreira; D P Bota; A Bross; C Mélot; J L Vincent
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-10-10       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Factors influencing the development of decubitus ulcers in critically ill surgical patients.

Authors:  S R Eachempati; L J Hydo; P S Barie
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Research recruitment practices and critically ill patients. A multicenter, cross-sectional study (the Consent Study).

Authors:  Karen E A Burns; Celia Zubrinich; Wylie Tan; Stavroula Raptis; Wei Xiong; Orla Smith; Ellen McDonald; John C Marshall; Raphael Saginur; Ron Heslegrave; Gordon Rubenfeld; Deborah J Cook
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 21.405

8.  Predicting pressure ulcer risk: a multisite study of the predictive validity of the Braden Scale.

Authors:  N Bergstrom; B Braden; M Kemp; M Champagne; E Ruby
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  Revised National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel Pressure Injury Staging System: Revised Pressure Injury Staging System.

Authors:  Laura E Edsberg; Joyce M Black; Margaret Goldberg; Laurie McNichol; Lynn Moore; Mary Sieggreen
Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 1.741

Review 10.  Introduction of a pilot study.

Authors:  Junyong In
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2017-11-14
View more
  2 in total

1.  Securement to prevent device-related pressure injuries in the intensive care unit: A randomised controlled feasibility study.

Authors:  Fiona Coyer; Jane-Louise Cook; Wendy Brown; Amanda Vann; Anna Doubrovsky
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-06-28       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Systematic review: Incidence and prevalence of mucous membrane pressure injury in adults admitted to acute hospital settings.

Authors:  Paul Fulbrook; Josephine Lovegrove; Sandra Miles; Ban Isaqi
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 3.315

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.