Literature DB >> 23370912

CA 19-9: handle with care.

Claudio Galli1, Daniela Basso, Mario Plebani.   

Abstract

Since its inception in the mid-1980s of the 20th century testing for carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) has raised expectation for an earlier diagnosis and accurate monitoring of several malignant diseases. After almost 30 years, the available evidences have confirmed the appropriateness and usefulness of determining CA 19-9 levels as a prognostic indicator and as a reliable tool for monitoring pancreatic and gastrointestinal cancer, but concerns have been raised about its applications in screening, which is actually not recommended, and in the diagnosis of malignancies, due to several interferences that limit the specificity and to the insufficient sensitivity of this marker. In this paper we aimed to review the basic concepts of CA 19-9 testing and its current applications, with a major focus on the most recent evidences dealing with assay interference, methods comparison and monitoring of malignant diseases. The prognostic value and monitoring recommendations for pancreatic, gastric and colorectal cancers are described in depth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23370912     DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2012-0744

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med        ISSN: 1434-6621            Impact factor:   3.694


  25 in total

1.  Prognostic role of serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels in patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Jinyan Zhang; Tao Huang; Fan Zhang; Junming Xu; Guoqing Chen; Xiaoliang Wang; Li Huang; Zhihai Peng
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-03-19

2.  Reference intervals of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 in the apparently healthy adult population.

Authors:  Gao-Ming Zhang; Shu-Mei Bai; Guo-Ming Zhang; Xiao-Bo Ma
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 2.352

3.  Direct detection of early-stage cancers using circulating tumor DNA.

Authors:  Jillian Phallen; Mark Sausen; Vilmos Adleff; Alessandro Leal; Carolyn Hruban; James White; Valsamo Anagnostou; Jacob Fiksel; Stephen Cristiano; Eniko Papp; Savannah Speir; Thomas Reinert; Mai-Britt Worm Orntoft; Brian D Woodward; Derek Murphy; Sonya Parpart-Li; David Riley; Monica Nesselbush; Naomi Sengamalay; Andrew Georgiadis; Qing Kay Li; Mogens Rørbæk Madsen; Frank Viborg Mortensen; Joost Huiskens; Cornelis Punt; Nicole van Grieken; Remond Fijneman; Gerrit Meijer; Hatim Husain; Robert B Scharpf; Luis A Diaz; Siân Jones; Sam Angiuoli; Torben Ørntoft; Hans Jørgen Nielsen; Claus Lindbjerg Andersen; Victor E Velculescu
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 17.956

4.  Semi-quantitative measurement of a specific glycoform using a DNA-tagged antibody and lectin affinity chromatography for glyco-biomarker development.

Authors:  Ju Hee Lee; Chang Hee Cho; Sun Hee Kim; Jeong Gu Kang; Jong Shin Yoo; Chulhun Ludgerus Chang; Jeong-Heon Ko; Yong-Sam Kim
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 5.911

5.  The prognostic role of baseline CEA and CA 19-9 values and their time-dependent variations in advanced colorectal cancer patients submitted to first-line therapy.

Authors:  M Tampellini; A Ottone; I Alabiso; C Baratelli; L Forti; A Berruti; E Aroasio; G V Scagliotti
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-11-06

Review 6.  Glycosylation in cancer: its application as a biomarker and recent advances of analytical techniques.

Authors:  Yoshimi Haga; Koji Ueda
Journal:  Glycoconj J       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 2.916

Review 7.  Colorectal cancer biomarkers: to be or not to be? Cautionary tales from a road well travelled.

Authors:  Kim Y C Fung; Edouard Nice; Ilka Priebe; Damien Belobrajdic; Aloke Phatak; Leanne Purins; Bruce Tabor; Celine Pompeia; Trevor Lockett; Timothy E Adams; Antony Burgess; Leah Cosgrove
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Serum Biomarker Signature-Based Liquid Biopsy for Diagnosis of Early-Stage Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Linda D Mellby; Andreas P Nyberg; Julia S Johansen; Christer Wingren; Børge G Nordestgaard; Stig E Bojesen; Breeana L Mitchell; Brett C Sheppard; Rosalie C Sears; Carl A K Borrebaeck
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  CA19-9 as a Predictor of Worse Clinical Outcome in Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma.

Authors:  Renata Alencar; Daniel Barretto Kendler; Fernanda Andrade; Carla Nava; Daniel Bulzico; Cencita Cordeiro de Noronha Pessoa; Rossana Corbo; Fernanda Vaisman
Journal:  Eur Thyroid J       Date:  2019-04-02

Review 10.  Introduction to glycopathology: the concept, the tools and the perspectives.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Gabius; Klaus Kayser
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 2.644

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.