PURPOSE: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a poor prognosis, with a 5-year survival of < 10% because of diffuse symptoms leading to late-stage diagnosis. That survival could increase significantly if localized tumors could be detected early. Therefore, we used multiparametric analysis of blood samples to obtain a novel biomarker signature of early-stage PDAC. The signature was derived from a large patient cohort, including patients with well-defined early-stage (I and II) PDAC. This biomarker signature was validated subsequently in an independent patient cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The biomarker signature was derived from a case-control study, using a Scandinavian cohort, consisting of 16 patients with stage I, 132 patients with stage II, 65 patients with stage III, and 230 patients with stage IV PDAC, and 888 controls. This signature was validated subsequently in an independent case-control cohort in the United States with 15 patients with stage I, 75 patients with stage II, 15 patients with stage III, and 38 patients with stage IV PDAC, and 219 controls. An antibody microarray platform was used to identify the serum biomarker signature associated with early-stage PDAC. RESULTS: Using the Scandinavian case-control study, a biomarker signature was created, discriminating samples derived from patients with stage I and II from those from controls with a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve value of 0.96. This signature, consisting of 29 biomarkers, was then validated in an independent case-control study in the United States. The biomarker signature could discriminate patients with stage I and II PDAC from controls in this independent patient cohort with a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve value of 0.96. CONCLUSION: This serum biomarker signature might represent a tenable approach to detecting early-stage, localized PDAC if these findings are supported by a prospective validation study.
PURPOSE:Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a poor prognosis, with a 5-year survival of < 10% because of diffuse symptoms leading to late-stage diagnosis. That survival could increase significantly if localized tumors could be detected early. Therefore, we used multiparametric analysis of blood samples to obtain a novel biomarker signature of early-stage PDAC. The signature was derived from a large patient cohort, including patients with well-defined early-stage (I and II) PDAC. This biomarker signature was validated subsequently in an independent patient cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The biomarker signature was derived from a case-control study, using a Scandinavian cohort, consisting of 16 patients with stage I, 132 patients with stage II, 65 patients with stage III, and 230 patients with stage IV PDAC, and 888 controls. This signature was validated subsequently in an independent case-control cohort in the United States with 15 patients with stage I, 75 patients with stage II, 15 patients with stage III, and 38 patients with stage IV PDAC, and 219 controls. An antibody microarray platform was used to identify the serum biomarker signature associated with early-stage PDAC. RESULTS: Using the Scandinavian case-control study, a biomarker signature was created, discriminating samples derived from patients with stage I and II from those from controls with a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve value of 0.96. This signature, consisting of 29 biomarkers, was then validated in an independent case-control study in the United States. The biomarker signature could discriminate patients with stage I and II PDAC from controls in this independent patient cohort with a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve value of 0.96. CONCLUSION: This serum biomarker signature might represent a tenable approach to detecting early-stage, localized PDAC if these findings are supported by a prospective validation study.
Authors: Jungsun Kim; William R Bamlet; Ann L Oberg; Kari G Chaffee; Greg Donahue; Xing-Jun Cao; Suresh Chari; Benjamin A Garcia; Gloria M Petersen; Kenneth S Zaret Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2017-07-12 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Gershon Y Locker; Stanley Hamilton; Jules Harris; John M Jessup; Nancy Kemeny; John S Macdonald; Mark R Somerfield; Daniel F Hayes; Robert C Bast Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-10-23 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Anders Carlsson; Christer Wingren; Malin Kristensson; Carsten Rose; Mårten Fernö; Håkan Olsson; Helena Jernström; Sara Ek; Elin Gustavsson; Christian Ingvar; Mattias Ohlsson; Carsten Peterson; Carl A K Borrebaeck Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-08-15 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Hans Vasen; Isaura Ibrahim; Carmen Guillen Ponce; Emily P Slater; Elvira Matthäi; Alfredo Carrato; Julie Earl; Kristin Robbers; Anneke M van Mil; Thomas Potjer; Bert A Bonsing; Wouter H de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel; Wilma Bergman; Martin Wasser; Hans Morreau; Günter Klöppel; Christoph Schicker; Martin Steinkamp; Jens Figiel; Irene Esposito; Evelina Mocci; Enrique Vazquez-Sequeiros; Alfonso Sanjuanbenito; Maria Muñoz-Beltran; José Montans; Peter Langer; Volker Fendrich; Detlef K Bartsch Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-04-25 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jared R Mayers; Chen Wu; Clary B Clish; Peter Kraft; Margaret E Torrence; Brian P Fiske; Chen Yuan; Ying Bao; Mary K Townsend; Shelley S Tworoger; Shawn M Davidson; Thales Papagiannakopoulos; Annan Yang; Talya L Dayton; Shuji Ogino; Meir J Stampfer; Edward L Giovannucci; Zhi Rong Qian; Douglas A Rubinson; Jing Ma; Howard D Sesso; John Michael Gaziano; Barbara B Cochrane; Simin Liu; Jean Wactawski-Wende; JoAnn E Manson; Michael N Pollak; Alec C Kimmelman; Amanda Souza; Kerry Pierce; Thomas J Wang; Robert E Gerszten; Charles S Fuchs; Matthew G Vander Heiden; Brian M Wolpin Journal: Nat Med Date: 2014-09-28 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Stephen P Pereira; Lucy Oldfield; Alexander Ney; Phil A Hart; Margaret G Keane; Stephen J Pandol; Debiao Li; William Greenhalf; Christie Y Jeon; Eugene J Koay; Christopher V Almario; Christopher Halloran; Anne Marie Lennon; Eithne Costello Journal: Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2020-03-02
Authors: Toshiya Abe; Chiho Koi; Shiro Kohi; Ki-Byung Song; Koji Tamura; Anne Macgregor-Das; Naoki Kitaoka; Miguel Chuidian; Madeline Ford; Mohamad Dbouk; Michael Borges; Jin He; Richard Burkhart; Christopher L Wolfgang; Alison P Klein; James R Eshleman; Ralph H Hruban; Marcia Irene Canto; Michael Goggins Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2019-10-30 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Aaron J Grossberg; Linda C Chu; Christopher R Deig; Eliot K Fishman; William L Hwang; Anirban Maitra; Daniel L Marks; Arnav Mehta; Nima Nabavizadeh; Diane M Simeone; Colin D Weekes; Charles R Thomas Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2020-07-19 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Michael Goggins; Kasper Alexander Overbeek; Randall Brand; Sapna Syngal; Marco Del Chiaro; Detlef K Bartsch; Claudio Bassi; Alfredo Carrato; James Farrell; Elliot K Fishman; Paul Fockens; Thomas M Gress; Jeanin E van Hooft; R H Hruban; Fay Kastrinos; Allison Klein; Anne Marie Lennon; Aimee Lucas; Walter Park; Anil Rustgi; Diane Simeone; Elena Stoffel; Hans F A Vasen; Djuna L Cahen; Marcia Irene Canto; Marco Bruno Journal: Gut Date: 2019-10-31 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Ali Al-Fatlawi; Negin Malekian; Sebastián García; Andreas Henschel; Ilwook Kim; Andreas Dahl; Beatrix Jahnke; Peter Bailey; Sarah Naomi Bolz; Anna R Poetsch; Sandra Mahler; Robert Grützmann; Christian Pilarsky; Michael Schroeder Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-05-28 Impact factor: 6.639