Literature DB >> 24574763

Colorectal cancer biomarkers: to be or not to be? Cautionary tales from a road well travelled.

Kim Y C Fung1, Edouard Nice1, Ilka Priebe1, Damien Belobrajdic1, Aloke Phatak1, Leanne Purins1, Bruce Tabor1, Celine Pompeia1, Trevor Lockett1, Timothy E Adams1, Antony Burgess1, Leah Cosgrove1.   

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cause of cancer-related death worldwide and places a major economic burden on the global health care system. The time frame for development from premalignant to malignant disease typically spans 10-15 years, and this latent period provides an ideal opportunity for early detection and intervention to improve patient outcomes. Currently, early diagnosis of CRC is hampered by a lack of suitable non-invasive biomarkers that are clinically or economically acceptable for population-based screening. New blood-based protein biomarkers for early detection of CRC are therefore urgently required. The success of clinical biomarker discovery and validation studies is critically dependent on understanding and adjusting for potential experimental, analytical, and biological factors that can interfere with the robust interpretation of results. In this review we outline some important considerations for research groups undertaking biomarker research with exemplars from our studies. Implementation of experimental strategies to minimise the potential effects of these problems will facilitate the identification of panels of biomarkers with the sensitivity and specificity required for the development of successful tests for the early detection and surveillance of CRC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bias; Biomarker; Colorectal cancer; Diagnostic; Discovery; Validation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24574763      PMCID: PMC3921542          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i4.888

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  75 in total

1.  Simultaneous measurement of soluble carcinoembryonic antigen and the tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase TIMP1 serum levels for use as markers of pre-invasive to invasive colorectal cancer.

Authors:  P Pellegrini; I Contasta; A M Berghella; E Gargano; C Mammarella; D Adorno
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.968

2.  Preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level as an independent prognostic factor in colorectal cancer: Taiwan experience.

Authors:  W S Wang; J K Lin; T J Chiou; J H Liu; F S Fan; C C Yen; T C Lin; J K Jiang; S H Yang; H S Wang; P M Chen
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-2 (IGFBP-2) is a marker for the metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  A H Heald; K Kaushal; K W Siddals; A S Rudenski; S G Anderson; J M Gibson
Journal:  Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.949

4.  Serum concentrations of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) are decreased in colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  G V Brierley; I K Priebe; L Purins; K Y C Fung; B Tabor; T Lockett; E Nice; P Gibbs; J Tie; P McMurrick; J Moore; A Ruszkiewicz; A Burgess; L J Cosgrove
Journal:  Cancer Biomark       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.388

5.  Independent validation of a prognostic genomic signature (ColoPrint) for patients with stage II colon cancer.

Authors:  Matthias Maak; Iris Simon; Ulrich Nitsche; Paul Roepman; Mireille Snel; Annuska M Glas; Tibor Schuster; Gisela Keller; Eliane Zeestraten; Inès Goossens; Klaus-Peter Janssen; Helmut Friess; Robert Rosenberg
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  ColoGuidePro: a prognostic 7-gene expression signature for stage III colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Anita Sveen; Trude H Ågesen; Arild Nesbakken; Gunn Iren Meling; Torleiv O Rognum; Knut Liestøl; Rolf I Skotheim; Ragnhild A Lothe
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 7.  Colorectal cancer screening--optimizing current strategies and new directions.

Authors:  Ernst J Kuipers; Thomas Rösch; Michael Bretthauer
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 8.  CA 19-9: handle with care.

Authors:  Claudio Galli; Daniela Basso; Mario Plebani
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 9.  The Early Detection Research Network's Specimen reference sets: paving the way for rapid evaluation of potential biomarkers.

Authors:  Ziding Feng; Jacob Kagan; Margaret Pepe; Mark Thornquist; Jo Ann Rinaudo; Jackie Dahlgren; Karl Krueger; Yingye Zheng; Christos Patriotis; Ying Huang; Lynn Sorbara; Ian Thompson; Sudhir Srivastava
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 8.327

10.  Detection of methylated SEPT9 in plasma is a reliable screening method for both left- and right-sided colon cancers.

Authors:  Kinga Tóth; Ferenc Sipos; Alexandra Kalmár; Arpád V Patai; Barnabás Wichmann; Robert Stoehr; Henriette Golcher; Vera Schellerer; Zsolt Tulassay; Béla Molnár
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Early detection of colorectal cancer: from conventional methods to novel biomarkers.

Authors:  Nasimeh Vatandoost; Jahanafrooz Ghanbari; Mahboobeh Mojaver; Amir Avan; Majid Ghayour-Mobarhan; Reza Nedaeinia; Rasoul Salehi
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Locked nucleic acid anti-miR-21 inhibits cell growth and invasive behaviors of a colorectal adenocarcinoma cell line: LNA-anti-miR as a novel approach.

Authors:  R Nedaeinia; M Sharifi; A Avan; M Kazemi; L Rafiee; M Ghayour-Mobarhan; R Salehi
Journal:  Cancer Gene Ther       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 5.987

Review 3.  Epigenetics in diagnosis of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Aga Syed Sameer; Saniya Nissar
Journal:  Mol Biol Res Commun       Date:  2016-03

4.  A 19-Gene expression signature as a predictor of survival in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Nurul Ainin Abdul Aziz; Norfilza M Mokhtar; Roslan Harun; Md Manir Hossain Mollah; Isa Mohamed Rose; Ismail Sagap; Azmi Mohd Tamil; Wan Zurinah Wan Ngah; Rahman Jamal
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 3.063

Review 5.  Contribution of galectin-1, a glycan-binding protein, to gastrointestinal tumor progression.

Authors:  María L Bacigalupo; Pablo Carabias; María F Troncoso
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  LINC00152: A pivotal oncogenic long non-coding RNA in human cancers.

Authors:  Yang Yu; Jian Yang; Quanpeng Li; Boming Xu; Yifan Lian; Lin Miao
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 6.831

7.  DNA Repair-Related Gene Signature in Predicting Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Min-Yi Lv; Wei Wang; Min-Er Zhong; Du Cai; Dejun Fan; Cheng-Hang Li; Wei-Bin Kou; Ze-Ping Huang; Xin Duan; Chuling Hu; Qiqi Zhu; Xiaosheng He; Feng Gao
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  Systematic large-scale meta-analysis identifies a panel of two mRNAs as blood biomarkers for colorectal cancer detection.

Authors:  Maria Teresa Rodia; Giampaolo Ugolini; Gabriella Mattei; Isacco Montroni; Davide Zattoni; Federico Ghignone; Giacomo Veronese; Giorgia Marisi; Mattia Lauriola; Pierluigi Strippoli; Rossella Solmi
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-05-24

9.  Proteins are potent biomarkers to detect colon cancer progression.

Authors:  Palaniselvam Kuppusamy; Natanamurugaraj Govindan; Mashitah M Yusoff; Solachuddin J A Ichwan
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2014-10-05       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 10.  Current advances of long non-coding RNA highly upregulated in liver cancer in human tumors.

Authors:  Zhonghua Ma; Hesuyuan Huang; Yetao Xu; Xuezhi He; Jirong Wang; Bingqing Hui; Hao Ji; Jing Zhou; Keming Wang
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 4.147

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.