Literature DB >> 23361097

Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: outcomes in 513 patients.

Oktar Asoglu1, Emre Balik, Enver Kunduz, Sumer Yamaner, Ali Akyuz, Mine Gulluoglu, Yersu Kapran, Dursun Bugra.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few reports have demonstrated the feasibility and efficacy of laparoscopic resection in patients with rectal cancer (RC). The objective of the present study was to assess the effectiveness of laparoscopic resection for RC, with an emphasis on perioperative variables and long-term oncological outcomes.
METHODS: This prospective study was carried out between January 2005 and September 2010 and included 513 patients diagnosed with RC who underwent laparoscopic surgery. Patients with locally advanced RC (cT3/cT4 or N+) received neoadjuvant treatment. Adjuvant treatment was applied to patients with stage II/III disease or according to the neoadjuvant protocol. All patients were followed-up prospectively for the evaluation of complications and oncological outcome. Survival rate analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS: Sphincter-preserving surgery was performed on 389 patients, and the remaining 124 patients underwent abdominoperineal resection. Perioperative mortality occurred in only one patient (0.2 %), and 27 (5.3 %) intraoperative complications were recorded. The most common postoperative complication was anastomotic leakage (5.5 %). The conversion rate was 6.4 %. The mean number of harvested lymph nodes was 23.6 ± 13. The mean distance to the distal margin was 2.6 ± 1.9 (0-7) cm. Distal margin positivity was detected in 9 (1.7 %) patients. The circumferential margin was positive in 39 (7.6 %) cases. After a median follow-up period of 30 (1-78) months, recurrence occurred in a total of 59 patients (11.5 %). Local recurrence was detected in 16 patients (3.1 %), and both local and distant recurrence was found in 7 patients (1.4 %). Distant recurrence only was detected in 43 patients (8.4 %). The overall 5-year survival rate was 84 %, and the 5-year disease-free survival rate was 77.4 %. The local recurrence-free survival rate was 98.4 % at 2 years, 95.7 % at 3 years, and 94.3 % at 5 years.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results, together with the review of the literature, clearly demonstrate that laparoscopic resection for RC is a feasible method at specialized high-volume centers. The long-term outcomes are at least as good as those from open surgery as long as the principles of oncologic surgery are respected and faithfully performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23361097     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-013-1927-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  31 in total

1.  Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  D G Jayne; H C Thorpe; J Copeland; P Quirke; J M Brown; P J Guillou
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: long-term oncologic results.

Authors:  Christophe Laurent; Fabien Leblanc; Philippe Wütrich; Mathieu Scheffler; Eric Rullier
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic resection versus open surgery in patients with rectal cancer: a randomized, controlled trial from China.

Authors:  Xiaobo Liang; Shenghuai Hou; Haiyi Liu; Yaoping Li; Bo Jiang; Wenqi Bai; Guodong Li; Wengyuan Wang; Yi Feng; Juan Guo
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2011-03-12       Impact factor: 1.878

4.  Laparoscopic vs open resection for patients with rectal cancer: comparison of perioperative outcomes and long-term survival.

Authors:  Seung Hyuk Baik; Mikhail Gincherman; Matthew G Mutch; Elisa H Birnbaum; James W Fleshman
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1,014 patients.

Authors:  A Vignali; V W Fazio; I C Lavery; J W Milsom; J M Church; T L Hull; S A Strong; J R Oakley
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  The pathological assessment of mesorectal excision: implications for further treatment and quality management.

Authors:  P Hermanek; P Hermanek; W Hohenberger; M Klimpfinger; F Köckerling; T Papadopoulos
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-02-14       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Long-term outcomes of patients undergoing curative laparoscopic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Milsom; Olival de Oliveira; Koiana I Trencheva; Sushil Pandey; Sang W Lee; Toyooki Sonoda
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: oncological results and clinical outcome of 225 patients.

Authors:  Ayman Agha; Alois Fürst; Johanna Hierl; Igors Iesalnieks; Gabriel Glockzin; Matthias Anthuber; Karl-Walter Jauch; Hans J Schlitt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-07-12       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic-assisted versus open abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Simon S M Ng; Ka Lau Leung; Janet F Y Lee; Raymond Y C Yiu; Jimmy C M Li; Anthony Y B Teoh; Wing Wa Leung
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-04-05       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Surgery for Colorectal Cancer - Trends, Developments, and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Markus Rentsch; Tobias Schiergens; Andrej Khandoga; Jens Werner
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2016-06-13

2.  Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for extraperitoneal rectal cancer: long-term results of a 18-year single-centre experience.

Authors:  Riccardo Brachet Contul; Manuela Grivon; Massimiliano Fabozzi; Paolo Millo; Mario Junior Nardi; Stefania Aimonetto; Umberto Parini; Rosaldo Allieta
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Proctectomy for Rectal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Amit Merchea; Shahzad M Ali; Scott R Kelley; Emilie Duchalais; Jasim Y Alabbad; Eric J Dozois; David W Larson
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Efficacy of transanal tube for prevention of anastomotic leakage following laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancers: a retrospective cohort study in a single institution.

Authors:  Eiji Hidaka; Fumio Ishida; Shumpei Mukai; Kenta Nakahara; Daisuke Takayanagi; Chiyo Maeda; Yusuke Takehara; Jun-ichi Tanaka; Shin-ei Kudo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Intraoperative adverse events during laparoscopic colorectal resection--better laparoscopic treatment but unchanged incidence. Lessons learnt from a Swiss multi-institutional analysis of 3,928 patients.

Authors:  P Kambakamba; D Dindo; A Nocito; P A Clavien; B Seifert; M Schäfer; D Hahnloser
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer in male patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: comparison of short-term outcomes.

Authors:  Kursat Rahmi Serin; Fatma Ayca Gultekin; Burçin Batman; Serden Ay; Yersu Kapran; Sezer Saglam; Oktar Asoglu
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2015-05-19

7.  Higher risk of incomplete mesorectal excision and positive circumferential margin in low rectal cancer regardless of surgical technique.

Authors:  Alexander Ferko; Julius Orhalmi; Tomas Dusek; Milan Chobola; Eva Hovorkova; Dimitar Hadzi Nikolov
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 1.195

8.  Long-term outcomes and propensity score matching analysis: rectal cancer resection for patients with elevated preoperative risk.

Authors:  Hao Feng; Tobias S Schiergens; Zhi-Hai Mao; Jingkun Zhao; Xiaohui Shen; Ai-Guo Lu; Wolfgang E Thasler
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-04-11

9.  Propensity score matching comparison of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer in a middle-income country: short-term outcomes and cost analysis.

Authors:  Daiane Oliveira Tayar; Ulysses Ribeiro; Ivan Cecconello; Tiago M Magalhães; Claudia M Simões; José Otávio C Auler
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2018-09-12

10.  Smoking and tumor obstruction are risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection during rectal cancer treatment.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Matsuzaki; Soichiro Ishihara; Kazushige Kawai; Koji Murono; Kensuke Otani; Koji Yasuda; Takeshi Nishikawa; Toshiaki Tanaka; Tomomichi Kiyomatsu; Keisuke Hata; Hiroaki Nozawa; Toshiaki Watanabe
Journal:  J Anus Rectum Colon       Date:  2018-05-25
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.