Literature DB >> 23358844

Clinical feasibility of inferior right hepatic vein-preserving trisegmentectomy 5, 7, and 8 (with video).

Sung Hoon Choi1, Gi Hong Choi, Dai Hoon Han, Jin Sub Choi, Woo Jung Lee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Hepatic resection involves not only complete removal of tumors but also preservation of optimal liver function after surgery. This study introduces the technique of inferior right hepatic vein (IRHV)-preserving trisegmentectomy 5, 7, and 8 and evaluates its clinical feasibility.
METHODS: Between January 2008 and December 2011, four patients underwent this procedure. Postoperative outcomes and interim results were evaluated.
RESULTS: The median estimated volumes of the left lobe only and the left lobe plus preserved parenchyma relative to the total estimated liver volume were 22.8 % (range, 21.1-24.2 %) and 43.6 % (range, 38.0-47.5 %), respectively. The median total operating time and blood loss were 349 min (range, 348-417 min) and 650 ml (range, 300-1,700 ml), respectively. One patient developed the postoperative complication of bile leakage. The median hospital stay was 14.5 days (range, 14-50 days). Median follow-up was 23.5 months (range, 6-70 months), and two patients developed recurrence. One patient died of disease progression, and the other three patients were alive at the last follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Based on our experience, IRHV-preserving trisegmentectomy 5, 7, and 8 is a safe and feasible procedure. This technique could be an option for curative resection minimizing postoperative deterioration of liver function without preoperative portal vein embolization in patients with a reliable IRHV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23358844     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-012-2130-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  27 in total

1.  Anatomical variations in the pattern of the right hepatic veins: possibilities for type classification.

Authors:  L De Cecchis; M Hribernik; D Ravnik; E M Gadzijev
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 2.  Controversies in the use of portal vein embolization.

Authors:  Thomas M van Gulik; Jacomina W van den Esschert; Wilmar de Graaf; Krijn P van Lienden; Olivier R C Busch; Michal Heger; Otto M van Delden; Johan S Laméris; Dirk J Gouma
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 2.588

Review 3.  Present status and future perspectives of preoperative portal vein embolization.

Authors:  Hai Liu; Shaihong Zhu
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Subtotal hepatectomy: a new procedure based on the inferior right hepatic vein.

Authors:  H U Baer; A R Dennison; G J Maddern; L H Blumgart
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Four new hepatectomy procedures for resection of the right hepatic vein and preservation of the inferior right hepatic vein.

Authors:  M Makuuchi; H Hasegawa; S Yamazaki; K Takayasu
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1987-01

6.  Postoperative liver failure after major hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in the modern era with special reference to remnant liver volume.

Authors:  K Shirabe; M Shimada; T Gion; H Hasegawa; K Takenaka; T Utsunomiya; K Sugimachi
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Evaluation of hepatic venous congestion: proposed indication criteria for hepatic vein reconstruction.

Authors:  Keiji Sano; Masatoshi Makuuchi; Kenji Miki; Atsushi Maema; Yasuhiko Sugawara; Hiroshi Imamura; Hidetoshi Matsunami; Tadatoshi Takayama
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Preoperative portal vein embolization for extended hepatectomy.

Authors:  Alan W Hemming; Alan I Reed; Richard J Howard; Shiro Fujita; Steven N Hochwald; James G Caridi; Irvin F Hawkins; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  The small remnant liver after major liver resection: how common and how relevant?

Authors:  Cengizhan Yigitler; Olivier Farges; Reza Kianmanesh; Jean-Marc Regimbeau; Eddie K Abdalla; Jacques Belghiti
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.799

10.  Hepatic venous congestion in living donor liver transplantation: preoperative quantitative prediction and follow-up using computed tomography.

Authors:  Shin Hwang; Sung-Gyu Lee; Kwang-Min Park; Ki-Hun Kim; Chul-Soo Ahn; Young-Joo Lee; Kyu-Bo Sung; Deok-Bog Moon; Tae-Yong Ha; Sung-Hun Cho; Ki-Bong Oh; Ji-Min Han; Myung-Hwan Kim
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.799

View more
  4 in total

1.  Verification of inferior right hepatic vein-conserving segments 7 to 8 resection of the liver.

Authors:  Hisashi Nakayama; Tadatoshi Takayama; Tokio Higaki; Takao Okubo; Masamichi Moriguchi; Nao Yoshida; Akiko Kuronuma
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-04

2.  Laparoscopic liver resection using a rubber band retraction technique: usefulness and perioperative outcome in 100 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Sung Hoon Choi; Gi Hong Choi; Dai Hoon Han; Jin Sub Choi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Robotic extrahepatic Glissonean pedicle approach for anatomic liver resection in the right liver: techniques and perioperative outcomes.

Authors:  Jin Ho Lee; Dai Hoon Han; Dong-Su Jang; Gi Hong Choi; Jin Sub Choi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Robotic hepatectomy: the Korean experience and perspective.

Authors:  Gi Hong Choi; Jae Uk Chong; Dai Hoon Han; Jin Sub Choi; Woo Jung Lee
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 7.293

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.