Literature DB >> 10065820

Postoperative liver failure after major hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in the modern era with special reference to remnant liver volume.

K Shirabe1, M Shimada, T Gion, H Hasegawa, K Takenaka, T Utsunomiya, K Sugimachi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postoperative liver failure is a life-threatening complication after hepatic resection. Because of recent advances in liver surgery technique and a more stringent patient selection, mortality after hepatic resection has steadily decreased, but its incidence still ranges from 10% to 20%. The factors linked to postoperative liver failure in major hepatic resection in the modern era should be reevaluated. STUDY
DESIGN: Of 80 patients with viral markers (hepatitis C viral antibody or hepatitis B surface antigen) who underwent major hepatic resections (no less than bisegmentectomies) for hepatocellular carcinoma between 1990 and 1996, 7 patients (8.8%) died of postoperative liver failure within 6 months after hepatectomy. The cause of liver failure was analyzed based on both the preoperative data and the intraoperative findings. In addition, since all the patients who died of liver failure underwent a right hepatic lobectomy, a further data analysis was also done in 47 patients who underwent a right lobectomy of the liver. A volumetric analysis by CT was then done to evaluate the remnant liver volume.
RESULTS: Between the patients with liver failure and those without liver failure who underwent a right lobectomy, there were no significant differences in preoperative data or intraoperative findings. Volumetric analysis revealed that the remnant liver volume of patients who died of liver failure was significantly smaller than that of patients who lived (p = 0.008). The incidence of liver failure in patients with a remnant liver volume of less than 250 mL/m2 was 7 of 20 (38%), while it was 0 of 27 in patients with a liver volume of no less than 250 mL/m2 (p = 0.0012). The only significant risk factor for liver failure in patients with a remnant liver volume of less than 250 mL/m2 was diabetes mellitus (p = 0.0072).
CONCLUSIONS: The expected remnant liver volume appears to be a good predictor for liver failure in patients who undergo a right lobectomy of the liver. In patients with diabetes mellitus and an expected remnant liver volume of less than 250 mL/m2, a major hepatectomy should be avoided. Careful patient selection based on volumetric analysis in major hepatectomy cases could help prevent the occurrence of postoperative liver failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10065820     DOI: 10.1016/s1072-7515(98)00301-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  125 in total

Review 1.  Protection of the liver during hepatic surgery.

Authors:  Pierre-Alain Clavien; Jean Emond; Jean Nicolas Vauthey; Jacques Belghiti; Ravi S Chari; Steven M Strasberg
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Total resection of the right hepatic vein drainage area with the aid of three-dimensional computed tomography.

Authors:  Akinobu Taketomi; Kazuki Takeishi; Yohei Mano; Takeo Toshima; Takashi Motomura; Shinichi Aishima; Hideaki Uchiyama; Tomoharu Yoshizumi; Ken Shirabe; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Ratio of remnant to total liver volume or remnant to body weight: which one is more predictive on donor outcomes?

Authors:  Onur Yaprak; Necdet Guler; Gulum Altaca; Murat Dayangac; Tolga Demirbas; Murat Akyildiz; Levent Ulusoy; Yaman Tokat; Yildiray Yuzer
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Fused 99m-Tc-GSA SPECT/CT imaging for the preoperative evaluation of postoperative liver function: can the liver uptake index predict postoperative hepatic functional reserve?

Authors:  Morikatsu Yoshida; Shinya Shiraishi; Fumi Sakaguchi; Daisuke Utsunomiya; Kuniyuki Tashiro; Seiji Tomiguchi; Hirohisa Okabe; Toru Beppu; Hideo Baba; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.374

5.  Efficacy and safety of preoperative chemoembolization for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein invasion: a prospective comparative study.

Authors:  Yong-Fa Zhang; Rong-Ping Guo; Ru-Hai Zou; Jing-Xian Shen; Wei Wei; Shao-Hua Li; Han-Yue OuYang; Hong-Bo Zhu; Li Xu; Xiang-Ming Lao; Ming Shi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  [Diagnostic imaging in liver transplantation. Preoperative evaluation and postoperative complications].

Authors:  T Schroeder; S G Ruehm
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  Prognostic Factors and Survival Outcomes of Surgical Resection of Huge Hepatocellular Carcinomas.

Authors:  Jayanand Sunil Bhanu; Balasubramanian Venkitaraman; Ravisankar Palaniappan; Rama Ranganathan; Ramakrishnan Ayloor Seshadri; Vikash Mahajan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2020-03

Review 8.  Portal vein embolization in extended liver resection.

Authors:  Nisha Narula; Thomas A Aloia
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Is extended hepatectomy for hepatobiliary malignancy justified?

Authors:  Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Timothy M Pawlik; Eddie K Abdalla; James F Arens; Rabih A Nemr; Steven H Wei; Debra L Kennamer; Lee M Ellis; Steven A Curley
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Selection criteria for liver resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and chronic liver disease.

Authors:  Spiros-G Delis; Christos Dervenis
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.