Literature DB >> 26659247

Robotic extrahepatic Glissonean pedicle approach for anatomic liver resection in the right liver: techniques and perioperative outcomes.

Jin Ho Lee1, Dai Hoon Han1, Dong-Su Jang2, Gi Hong Choi3, Jin Sub Choi1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Glissonean pedicle approach is one of the most popular methods of anatomic liver surgery. Liver surgeons have attempted to reproduce this method laparoscopically. In this study, we introduce our technique of the extrahepatic Glissonean approach for anatomic liver resections, using a robotic system, and report on short-term perioperative outcomes.
METHODS: From December 2008 to July 2014, 10 patients underwent robotic anatomic liver resection in the right liver. The procedure is as follows: (1) mobilization of the liver and isolation and clamping of a selected Glissonean pedicle; (2) transection of the liver parenchyma using a rubber band retraction technique; (3) division of the Glissonean pedicle after full exposure, followed by completion of parenchymal transection.
RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 52.50 (range 28-59) years, and seven were male. All patients had hepatocellular carcinoma. The types of resections performed were as follows: segmentectomy 6 (n = 1), segmentectomy of 4b + 5 ventral segments (n = 2), right posterior sectionectomy (n = 3), extended right hepatectomy (n = 1), extended right posterior sectionectomy (n = 2), and central bisectionectomy (n = 1). Only one case was converted to open surgery due to severe tumor adhesions on the diaphragm. The median operative time was 555 min (range 413-848), and the median estimated blood loss was 225 ml (range 30-700), with no perioperative transfusions. The overall complication rate was 70 % (grade I, 5; grade II, 1; grade III, 1; grade IV, 0). The median length of hospital stay postsurgery was 7 days (range 6-11).
CONCLUSION: Robotic surgery allowed for successful anatomic liver resections via an extrahepatic Glissonean pedicle approach in the right liver and can be safely performed in selected patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anatomic resection; Glissonean approach; Robotic liver resection

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26659247     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4693-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  20 in total

1.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic ultrasonography for hepatic surgery.

Authors:  Caitlin M Schneider; Peter D Peng; Russell H Taylor; Gregory W Dachs; Christopher J Hasser; Simon P DiMaio; Michael A Choti
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Safe and feasible extrahepatic Glissonean access in laparoscopic anatomical liver resection.

Authors:  Akihiro Cho; Hiroshi Yamamoto; Osamu Kainuma; Hiroaki Souda; Atsushi Ikeda; Nobuhiro Takiguchi; Matsuo Nagata
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  A comprehensive meta-regression analysis on outcome of anatomic resection versus nonanatomic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Alessandro Cucchetti; Matteo Cescon; Giorgio Ercolani; Eleonora Bigonzi; Guido Torzilli; Antonio D Pinna
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Robot-integrated intraoperative ultrasound: Initial experience with hepatic malignancies.

Authors:  Francesco Guerra; Stefano Amore Bonapasta; Mario Annecchiarico; Stefano Bongiolatti; Andrea Coratti
Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 2.442

Review 5.  Laparoscopic robot-assisted major hepatectomy.

Authors:  Ugo Boggi; Fabio Caniglia; Gabriella Amorese
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 7.027

6.  Highly anatomically systematized hepatic resection with Glissonean sheath code transection at the hepatic hilus.

Authors:  K Takasaki; S Kobayashi; S Tanaka; A Saito; M Yamamoto; F Hanyu
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  1990 Apr-Jun

Review 7.  Robotic surgery.

Authors:  M Diana; J Marescaux
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Advancement of technology and its impact on urologists: release of the daVinci Xi, a new surgical robot.

Authors:  Timothy G Wilson
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Comparison of the outcomes between an anatomical subsegmentectomy and a non-anatomical minor hepatectomy for single hepatocellular carcinomas based on a Japanese nationwide survey.

Authors:  Susumu Eguchi; Takashi Kanematsu; Shigeki Arii; Masatoshi Okazaki; Kiwamu Okita; Masao Omata; Iwao Ikai; Masatoshi Kudo; Masamichi Kojiro; Masatoshi Makuuchi; Morito Monden; Yutaka Matsuyama; Yasuni Nakanuma; Kenichi Takayasu
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 10.  Glissonean pedicle transection method for liver surgery (with video).

Authors:  Masakazu Yamamoto; Satoshi Katagiri; Shun-ichi Ariizumi; Yoshihito Kotera; Yutaka Takahashi
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 7.027

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Robotic hepatectomy: the Korean experience and perspective.

Authors:  Gi Hong Choi; Jae Uk Chong; Dai Hoon Han; Jin Sub Choi; Woo Jung Lee
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 2.  Laparoscopic and robotic approach for hepatocellular carcinoma-state of the art.

Authors:  Giovanni Battista Levi Sandri; Edoardo de Werra; Gianluca Mascianà; Marco Colasanti; Roberto Santoro; Vito D'Andrea; Giuseppe Maria Ettorre
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 7.293

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.