Literature DB >> 12942474

The small remnant liver after major liver resection: how common and how relevant?

Cengizhan Yigitler1, Olivier Farges, Reza Kianmanesh, Jean-Marc Regimbeau, Eddie K Abdalla, Jacques Belghiti.   

Abstract

The maximum extent of hepatic resection compatible with a safe postoperative outcome is unknown. The study goal was to determine the incidence and impact of a small remnant liver volume after major liver resection in patients with normal liver parenchyma. Among 265 major hepatectomies performed at our institution (1998 to 2000), 138 patients with normal liver and a remnant liver volume (RLV) systematically calculated from the ratio of RLV to functional liver volume (FLV) were studied. Patients were divided into five groups based on RLV-FLV ratio from </=30% to >/=60%. Kinetics of postoperative liver function tests were correlated with RLV. Postoperative complications were stratified by RLV-FLV ratios. Ninety patients (65%) underwent resection of up to four Couinaud segments. The RLV-FLV ratio was </=60% in 94 patients (68%) including only 13 (9%) with RLV-FLV </=30%. There was no linear correlation between the number of resected segments and the RLV-FLV. Postoperative serum bilirubin but not prothrombin time correlated with extent of resection. The incidence of complications including liver failure was not different among groups. Analysis of the four groups with a RLV-FLV ratio <60% showed a trend toward more complications and a longer intensive care unit stay in patients with the smallest RLVs. After major hepatectomy in patients with normal livers, the proportion of patients with a small remnant liver is low and not directly related to the number of segments resected. Although the rate of postoperative complications, including liver failure, did not directly correlate with the volume of remaining liver, the postoperative course was more difficult for patients with smaller remnants. Therefore preoperative portal vein embolization should be considered in patients who will undergo extended liver resection who have (1) injured liver or (2) normal liver when the planned procedure will be complex or when the anticipated RLV-FLV will be <30%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12942474     DOI: 10.1053/jlts.2003.50194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  49 in total

Review 1.  Protection of the liver during hepatic surgery.

Authors:  Pierre-Alain Clavien; Jean Emond; Jean Nicolas Vauthey; Jacques Belghiti; Ravi S Chari; Steven M Strasberg
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Preliminary study on liver function changes after trisectionectomy with versus without prior portal vein embolization.

Authors:  Maciej Malinowski; Johan Friso Lock; Daniel Seehofer; Bernhard Gebauer; Antje Schulz; Lina Demirel; Jan Bednarsch; Victoria Stary; Peter Neuhaus; Martin Stockmann
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  The "50-50 criteria" on postoperative day 5: an accurate predictor of liver failure and death after hepatectomy.

Authors:  Silvio Balzan; Jacques Belghiti; Olivier Farges; Satoshi Ogata; Alain Sauvanet; Didier Delefosse; François Durand
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  "State of the art" in liver resection and living donor liver transplantation: a worldwide survey of 100 liver centers.

Authors:  Stefan Breitenstein; Carlos Apestegui; Henrik Petrowsky; Pierre Alain Clavien
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Defining Post Hepatectomy Liver Insufficiency: Where do We stand?

Authors:  Kelly Lafaro; Stefan Buettner; Hadia Maqsood; Doris Wagner; Fabio Bagante; Gaya Spolverato; Li Xu; Ihab Kamel; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Post-hepatectomy liver failure in patients with colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Masato Narita; Elie Oussoultzoglou; Philippe Bachellier; Daniel Jaeck; Shinji Uemoto
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Importance of conserving middle hepatic vein distal branches for homogeneous regeneration of the left liver after right hepatectomy.

Authors:  Francois Faitot; Eric Vibert; Chady Salloum; David Lee Gorden; Franck Coscas; René Adam; Denis Castaing
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 3.647

8.  [Mesohepatectomy-an alternative to extended hepatectomy in the treatment of central liver tumors].

Authors:  H Lang; G C Sotiropoulos; N R Frühauf; A Radtke; M Malagó; Ch E Broelsch
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-03-12       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 9.  Quality improvement for portal vein embolization.

Authors:  Alban Denys; Pierre Bize; Nicolas Demartines; Frederic Deschamps; Thierry De Baere
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 2.740

10.  Assessment of future remnant liver function using hepatobiliary scintigraphy in patients undergoing major liver resection.

Authors:  Wilmar de Graaf; Krijn P van Lienden; Sander Dinant; Joris J T H Roelofs; Olivier R C Busch; Dirk J Gouma; Roelof J Bennink; Thomas M van Gulik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.