Literature DB >> 23358583

A new bone-anchored hearing implant: short-term retrospective data on implant survival and subjective benefit.

Rik C Nelissen1, Emmanuel A M Mylanus, Henricus P M Kunst, Ronald J E Pennings, Ad F M Snik, Myrthe K S Hol.   

Abstract

This report provides the first short-term follow-up data on the Ponto bone-anchored hearing implant from our tertiary referral centre. Thirty-one consecutive patients with a mean age of 51 years who received the implant between October 2010 and December 2011 were included retrospectively in this study. Implant loss, skin reactions around the implant (according to Holgers' grading system), revision surgery, and abutment replacements were retrospectively gathered from the patients' files as objective outcome measures. To obtain information on subjective patient satisfaction, the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) was used. The mean follow-up period was 16.9 months (range 12.1-25.2 months). One implant was lost. Over a total of 94 follow-up visits, 21 skin reactions were observed in 16 patients: Holgers grade 1 (slight redness, no need for treatment) in 18.1 % of the visits,and grade 2 (redness and moist, needing conservative treatment) in 4.3 % of the visits. Four 6-mm abutments (12.9 %) were replaced for a 9-mm abutment during the follow-up period, of which one (3.2 %) was in combination with revision surgery. In one patient keloid formation around the implant was observed. The GBI revealed a moderate subjective benefit. The short-term results with these percutaneous implants demonstrate a clinically stable implant with a low percentage of skin reactions that require treatment. Long-term, prospective follow-up data are needed to draw firmer conclusions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23358583     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-013-2346-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  29 in total

1.  Benefit and quality of life in older bone-anchored hearing aid users.

Authors:  Maarten J F de Wolf; My-Linh C Shival; Myrthe K S Hol; Emmanuel A M Mylanus; Cor W R J Cremers; Ad F M Snik
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Titanium fixtures for bone-conduction devices and the influence of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Laura Horstink; Hubert T Faber; Maarten J F de Wolf; Catharina A J Dun; Cor W R J Cremers; Myrthe K S Hol
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Assessment of more than 1,000 implanted percutaneous bone conduction devices: skin reactions and implant survival.

Authors:  Catharina A J Dun; Hubert T Faber; Maarten J F de Wolf; Emmanuel A M Mylanus; Cor W R J Cremers; Myrthe K S Hol
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Osseointegrated titanium implants in the temporal bone. A clinical study on bone-anchored hearing aids.

Authors:  A Tjellström; J Lindström; O Hallén; T Albrektsson; P I Brånemark
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1981-04

Review 5.  An overview of different systems: the bone-anchored hearing aid.

Authors:  Catharina A J Dun; Hubert T Faber; Maarten J F de Wolf; Cor W R J Cremers; Myrthe K S Hol
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-03-08

Review 6.  The Ponto bone-anchored hearing system.

Authors:  Patrik Westerkull
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-03-08

7.  Bone-anchored hearing aids: results of the first eight years of a programme in a district general hospital, assessed by the Glasgow benefit inventory.

Authors:  D Gillett; J W Fairley; T S Chandrashaker; A Bean; J Gonzalez
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2006-05-04       Impact factor: 1.469

8.  The Baha system in patients with single-sided deafness and contralateral hearing loss.

Authors:  Jack J Wazen; Mark J Van Ess; Jadiel Alameda; Carmello Ortega; Michelle Modisett; Karen Pinsky
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.497

9.  The Glasgow benefit inventory in the evaluation of patient satisfaction with the bone-anchored hearing aid: quality of life issues.

Authors:  Sunil N Dutt; Ann-Louise McDermott; Anwen Jelbert; Andrew P Reid; David W Proops
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol Suppl       Date:  2002

Review 10.  Wound healing and infection in surgery: the pathophysiological impact of smoking, smoking cessation, and nicotine replacement therapy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lars Tue Sørensen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  11 in total

1.  Audiological effectiveness of Bonebridge implantation for bilateral congenital malformation of the external and middle ear.

Authors:  Ran Ren; Shouqin Zhao; Danni Wang; Yi Li; Xiaobo Ma; Yuling Li; Xinxing Fu; Peiwei Chen; Jingmin Dou
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Safety and effectiveness of the Bonebridge transcutaneous active direct-drive bone-conduction hearing implant at 1-year device use.

Authors:  Sébastien Schmerber; O Deguine; M Marx; P Van de Heyning; O Sterkers; I Mosnier; P Garin; B Godey; C Vincent; F Venail; M Mondain; A Deveze; J P Lavieille; A Karkas
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Comparison of two different bone anchored hearing instruments.

Authors:  Ahmet Kara; Mahmut Tayyar Kalcioglu; Çağlayan Adigul; Merve Torun Topcu; Mehmet Koçoğlu; Bilgehan Celik; Mahmut Sinan Yilmaz
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 3.236

4.  Loading of osseointegrated implants for bone conduction hearing at 3 weeks: 3-year stability, survival, and tolerability.

Authors:  Rik C Nelissen; Christine A den Besten; Hubert T Faber; Catharina A J Dun; Emmanuel A M Mylanus; Myrthe K S Hol
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Stability, survival, and tolerability of a 4.5-mm-wide bone-anchored hearing implant: 6-month data from a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Rik C Nelissen; Christine A den Besten; Emmanuel A M Mylanus; Myrthe K S Hol
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Ten years of experience with the Ponto bone-anchored hearing system-A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Helén Lagerkvist; Karin Carvalho; Marcus Holmberg; Ulrika Petersson; Cor Cremers; Malou Hultcrantz
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 2.597

7.  Long-term Outcomes of Bone Conduction Hearing Implants in Patients With Bilateral Microtia-atresia.

Authors:  Xinmiao Fan; Tengyu Yang; Xiaomin Niu; Yibei Wang; Yue Fan; Xiaowei Chen
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Active transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implants: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Astrid Magele; Philipp Schoerg; Barbara Stanek; Bernhard Gradl; Georg Mathias Sprinzl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Sound localization with bilateral bone conduction devices.

Authors:  Coosje J I Caspers; A M Janssen; M J H Agterberg; C W R J Cremers; M K S Hol; A J Bosman
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  A Clinical Evaluation of Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery With a Modified Drill System for Inserting Bone-Anchored Hearing Implants.

Authors:  Coosje Jacoba Isabella Caspers; Ivo Joachim Kruyt; Emmanuel Antonius Maria Mylanus; Myrthe Karianne Sophie Hol
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 2.311

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.