Literature DB >> 22722143

Titanium fixtures for bone-conduction devices and the influence of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Laura Horstink1, Hubert T Faber, Maarten J F de Wolf, Catharina A J Dun, Cor W R J Cremers, Myrthe K S Hol.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate whether diabetes mellitus (DM) is a risk factor for titanium fixture loss in bone-conduction devices (BCDs) because of osseointegration failure. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective case study.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: All patients who received a BCD at Nijmegen between January 1, 1988, and December 31, 2007, were analyzed. The analyses were performed on 833 patients (993 implants) and a subpopulation of patients aged 40 years or older consisting of 641 patients (739 implants).
METHODS: Patients received a questionnaire asking about the presence of DM at the time of implantation. Data concerning implant loss were retrieved from medical records and the Nijmegen BCD database.
RESULTS: The total survival rate of the BCD implant in this population was 90.6%. The prevalence of DM was 9.3%. In the subpopulation of patients aged 40 years or older, the non-DM group lost 5.1% of their implants versus 14% of Type 2 DM patients, a statistically significantly difference (p = 0.003). Spontaneous loss, loss due to a Grade 4 Holgers skin reaction, and trauma accounted for 2.2% versus 4.7% (p = 0.13), 0.5% versus 2.3% (p = 0.1), and 0.6% versus 4.7% (p = 0.007), respectively, of implant losses in non-DM versus Type 2 DM patients.
CONCLUSION: The prevalence of DM among the Nijmegen BCD population is higher than the general Dutch prevalence. A statistically significantly higher implant loss was observed during the study period for Type 2 DM patients than non-DM BCD wearers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22722143     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318259b36c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  5 in total

1.  Percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: linear incision technique with tissue preservation versus linear incision technique with tissue reduction.

Authors:  E H H van der Stee; R M Strijbos; S J H Bom; M K S Hol
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  A new bone-anchored hearing implant: short-term retrospective data on implant survival and subjective benefit.

Authors:  Rik C Nelissen; Emmanuel A M Mylanus; Henricus P M Kunst; Ronald J E Pennings; Ad F M Snik; Myrthe K S Hol
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: dermatome versus linear incision technique.

Authors:  Ruben M Strijbos; Steven J H Bom; Stefan Zwerver; Myrthe K S Hol
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Multimodal Analysis of the Tissue Response to a Bone-Anchored Hearing Implant: Presentation of a Two-Year Case Report of a Patient With Recurrent Pain, Inflammation, and Infection, Including a Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Martin L Johansson; Tim G A Calon; Omar Omar; Furqan A Shah; Margarita Trobos; Peter Thomsen; Robert J Stokroos; Anders Palmquist
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 5.293

5.  Laser-Modified Surface Enhances Osseointegration and Biomechanical Anchorage of Commercially Pure Titanium Implants for Bone-Anchored Hearing Systems.

Authors:  Furqan A Shah; Martin L Johansson; Omar Omar; Hanna Simonsson; Anders Palmquist; Peter Thomsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.